| Literature DB >> 27418367 |
Varun Kumar1, Neha Sharma1, Hemant Sood1, Rajinder Singh Chauhan1.
Abstract
In the current study, we asked how the supply of immediate biosynthetic precursors i.e. cinnamic acid (CA) andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27418367 PMCID: PMC4945949 DOI: 10.1038/srep29750
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Optimum concentration determination for different precursor treatments; (a) CA, (b) CA+CAT and, (c) CAT. The optimum concentrations were determined by observing their effects on increase in P-I content. The data show means ± SD (n = 3). Significance was evaluated within each feeded samples between different concentrations of treatments and untreated control. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Figure 2Comparative analysis of different precursor treatments for their effect on shoot biomass; (a) P. kurroa shoots grown at optimum concentration of different precursors, (b) Shoot biomass (g). The data show means ± SD (n = 3). Significance was evaluated between different treatments and untreated control. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Figure 3Influence of different precursor treatments on the production of tested metabolites; (a) p-CA, (b) CA. The data show means ± SD (n = 3). Significance was evaluated between different treatments and untreated control. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Figure 4Expression profiles of selected shikimate/phenylpropanoid and iridoid pathway genes in CA, CAT and CA + CAT feeded shoot cultures of P. kurroa.
Expression levels were normalized to 26S and GAPDH reference genes expressions. Data is reported as average of four replicates ± SD of the mean. Significance was evaluated for each gene between different treatments and untreated control (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
Figure 5Activity profiles of PAL in CA, CAT and CA+CAT feeded shoot cultures of P. kurroa.
Data is reported as average of three replicates ± SD of the mean. Significance was evaluated between different treatments and untreated control (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Figure 6Correlogram showing correlations of tested genes and metabolites data.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients in genes and metabolites from the control, CA, CAT and CA+CAT treatment’s group. The data having similar patterns are grouped together and presented in the form of pie graphs filled in proportion to the Pearson’s coefficient values. Blue colored pie graphs filled clockwise indicate positive correlations while red colored pie graphs filled anti-clockwise indicate negative correlations.
Figure 7Cascades depicting influence of different treatments on the fluxes through shikimate/phenylpropanoid and iridoid pathways; (a) CA, (b) CA+CAT and (c) CAT. The symbols were added and structures were coded with different colors to highlight the effects occurring on the biosynthesis of P-I under different treatments. Gene expressions were highlighted by using the green circle with arrow pointing up shows up-regulation while red circle with arrow pointing down shows down-regulation. Orange colored box with arrow pointing up and down indicate up-regulation and down-regulation of PAL enzyme, respectively. Red colored loop indicate feedback inhibition effect. Bold arrows indicate the up-regulation of respective step. Green colored star indicate high significant increase. CHA, chorismate; DAHP, 3-Deoxy-D-arabinoheptulosonate 7-phosphate; GPP, geranyl pyrophosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; E4P, erythrose-4-phosphate.
Figure 8Schematic representation of P-I biosynthesis.
The structure of P-I linked to cinnamic acid (green color) and catalpol (orange color) moieties.
Primer sequences for selected genes used in quantitative RT-PCR analysis.
| Genes | Primer sequence | Fragment size (bp) | Annealing temperatures (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP 5′-CACAATGATAGGAAGAGCCGAC-3′RP 5′-CAAGGGAACGGGCTTGGCAGAATC-3′ | 500 | 58 | |
| FP 5′-TTGCCATCAATGACCCCTTCA-3′RP 5′-CGCCCCACTTGATTTTGGA-3′ | 215 | 56 | |
| FP 5′-ACACCATTAAAGCTCCTTGT-3′RP 5′-TAACAGTCTGAGATCCACCA-3′ | 171 | 59 | |
| FP 5′-GTCTACACACCTGCCATTAG-3′RP 5′-GTACAAATCAGCAACTAGGC-3′ | 198 | 52 | |
| FP 5′-GCAAGATAGATACGCTCTAA-3′RP 5′-GTTCCTTGAGACGTCAAT-3′ | 136 | 49 | |
| FP 5′-GCAACATTGATGTTCTCAAC-3′RP 5′-TCCAGCTCTTCAAGGACTAT-3′ | 169 | 53 | |
| FP 5′-TGGGTAGATTAGAAGCCAGA-3′RP 5′-CTGGTGATTTCTACCAGCTC-3′ | 139 | 52 | |
| FP 5′-TATCGAGCTTTTCAGTGGAT-3′RP 5′-GATGTGAGTCCTGTCGATTT-3′ | 136 | 52 |