Literature DB >> 27418347

Usability of Commercially Available Mobile Applications for Diverse Patients.

Urmimala Sarkar1,2, Gato I Gourley3,4, Courtney R Lyles3,4, Lina Tieu3,4, Cassidy Clarity3,4, Lisa Newmark5, Karandeep Singh6, David W Bates7,8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile applications or 'apps' intended to help people manage their health and chronic conditions are widespread and gaining in popularity. However, little is known about their acceptability and usability for low-income, racially/ethnically diverse populations who experience a disproportionate burden of chronic disease and its complications.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the usability of existing mobile health applications ("apps") for diabetes, depression, and caregiving, in order to facilitate development and tailoring of patient-facing apps for diverse populations.
DESIGN: Usability testing, a mixed-methods approach that includes interviewing and direct observation of participant technology use, was conducted with participants (n = 9 caregivers; n = 10 patients with depression; and n = 10 patients with diabetes) on a total of 11 of the most popular health apps (four diabetes apps, four depression apps, and three caregiver apps) on both iPad and Android tablets. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were diverse: 15 (58 %) African Americans, seven (27 %) Whites, two (8 %) Asians, two (8 %) Latinos with either diabetes, depression, or who were caregivers. MAIN MEASURES: Participants were given condition-specific tasks, such as entering a blood glucose value into a diabetes app. Participant interviews were video recorded and were coded using standard methods to evaluate attempts and completions of tasks. We performed inductive coding of participant comments to identify emergent themes. KEY
RESULTS: Participants completed 79 of 185 (43 %) tasks across 11 apps without assistance. Three themes emerged from participant comments: lack of confidence with technology, frustration with design features and navigation, and interest in having technology to support their self-management.
CONCLUSIONS: App developers should employ participatory design strategies in order to have an impact on chronic conditions such as diabetes and depression that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. While patients express interest in using technologies for self-management, current tools are not consistently usable for diverse patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic diseases; computers; handheld; informatics; patient engagement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27418347      PMCID: PMC5130945          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3771-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  28 in total

1.  Mobile Usability Testing in Healthcare: Methodological Approaches.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Borycki; Helen Monkman; Janessa Griffith; Andre W Kushniruk
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2015

2.  Care partners and online patient portals.

Authors:  Urmimala Sarkar; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Can mobile health technologies transform health care?

Authors:  Steven R Steinhubl; Evan D Muse; Eric J Topol
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Hypoglycemia is more common among type 2 diabetes patients with limited health literacy: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE).

Authors:  Urmimala Sarkar; Andrew J Karter; Jennifer Y Liu; Howard H Moffet; Nancy E Adler; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  An evaluation of diabetes self-management applications for Android smartphones.

Authors:  Andrew P Demidowich; Kevin Lu; Ronald Tamler; Zachary Bloomgarden
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 6.184

6.  Interest in Use of Technology for Healthcare Among Veterans Receiving Treatment for Mental Health.

Authors:  Christopher J Miller; D Keith McInnes; Kelly Stolzmann; Mark S Bauer
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.536

7.  Use of and interest in mobile health for diabetes self-care in vulnerable populations.

Authors:  James R Humble; Elizabeth A Tolley; Rebecca A Krukowski; Catherine R Womack; Todd S Motley; James E Bailey
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 6.184

8.  Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy.

Authors:  Lisa D Chew; Katharine A Bradley; Edward J Boyko
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  A framework for characterizing eHealth literacy demands and barriers.

Authors:  Connie V Chan; David R Kaufman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Quantifying usability: an evaluation of a diabetes mHealth system on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction metrics with associated user characteristics.

Authors:  Mattias Georgsson; Nancy Staggers
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  63 in total

1.  Got CKD? There's an App for That!

Authors:  Joel M Topf; Swapnil Hiremath
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Usability and Acceptability of a Comprehensive HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections Prevention App.

Authors:  Blanca Rodríguez Vargas; Javier Sánchez-Rubio Ferrández; Jorge Garrido Fuentes; Reyes Velayos; Ramón Morillo Verdugo; Ferrán Sala Piñol; Alberto Onteniente González; Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Sagrado
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Scaling evidence-based treatments through digital mental health.

Authors:  Stephen M Schueller; John Torous
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2020-11

4.  Translating self-persuasion into an adolescent HPV vaccine promotion intervention for parents attending safety-net clinics.

Authors:  Austin S Baldwin; Deanna C Denman; Margarita Sala; Emily G Marks; L Aubree Shay; Sobha Fuller; Donna Persaud; Simon Craddock Lee; Celette Sugg Skinner; Deborah J Wiebe; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-11-20

5.  Patient and healthcare provider views on a patient-reported outcomes portal.

Authors:  Robert M Cronin; Douglas Conway; David Condon; Rebecca N Jerome; Daniel W Byrne; Paul A Harris
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  What Will It Take to Reduce the App Gap?

Authors:  Lyn Paget; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Joseph Firth; John Torous; Jennifer Nicholas; Rebekah Carney; Abhishek Pratap; Simon Rosenbaum; Jerome Sarris
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 49.548

8.  Overcoming Barriers to Adoption of Digital Health Tools for Diabetes.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; David Kerr
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-03

9.  Su salud a la mano (your health at hand): patient perceptions about a bilingual patient portal in the Los Angeles safety net.

Authors:  Alejandra Casillas; Giselle Perez-Aguilar; Anshu Abhat; Griselda Gutierrez; Tanya T Olmos-Ochoa; Carmen Mendez; Anish Mahajan; Arleen Brown; Gerardo Moreno
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Information and communication technology use by female residents of public housing.

Authors:  Lisa M Quintiliani; Shivani Reddy; Rachel Goodman; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2016-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.