Anna Björkenheim1, Axel Brandes2, Alexander Chemnitz2, Anders Magnuson3, Nils Edvardsson4, Dritan Poçi5. 1. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. anna.bjorkenheim@regionorebrolan.se. 2. Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. 3. Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. 4. Sahlgrenska Academy at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 5. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Abstract
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00697359. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate rhythm control up to two years after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and its relation to reported symptoms. BACKGROUND: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) continuously records the electrocardiogram (ECG), has an automatic AF detection algorithm, and has a possibility for patients to activate an ECG recording during symptoms. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients (mean age 57 ± 9 years, 60% male, 88% paroxysmal AF) underwent AF ablation following ILR implantation. Device data were downloaded at the ablation and three, six, 12, 18, and 24 months after ablation. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients completed the two-year follow-up. Thirteen (24%) patients had no AF episodes detected by ILR during follow-up. Ten of 41 patients (24%) with AF recurrence were only detected by ILR and AF recurrences were detected earlier by ILR (P < 0.001). The median AF burden in patients with AF recurrence was 5.7% (interquartile range 0.4-14.4) and was even lower in patients with AF only detected by ILR (P = 0.001). Forty-eight % of the patients indicated symptoms via the patient activator but 33% of those recordings were not due to AF. Early AF recurrence (within 3 months) was highly associated with later AF recurrence (P < 0.001). AF burden >0.5% and longest AF episode >6 hours before the ablation were independent predictors of AF recurrence during intermittent but not continuous monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: After AF ablation, the AF burden was low throughout the 24 months follow-up. Nevertheless, symptoms were commonly indicated but one-third of patient-activated recordings did not show AF. Continuous monitoring was superior to intermittent follow-up in detecting AF episodes and assessing the AF burden.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00697359. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate rhythm control up to two years after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and its relation to reported symptoms. BACKGROUND: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) continuously records the electrocardiogram (ECG), has an automatic AF detection algorithm, and has a possibility for patients to activate an ECG recording during symptoms. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients (mean age 57 ± 9 years, 60% male, 88% paroxysmal AF) underwent AF ablation following ILR implantation. Device data were downloaded at the ablation and three, six, 12, 18, and 24 months after ablation. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients completed the two-year follow-up. Thirteen (24%) patients had no AF episodes detected by ILR during follow-up. Ten of 41 patients (24%) with AF recurrence were only detected by ILR and AF recurrences were detected earlier by ILR (P < 0.001). The median AF burden in patients with AF recurrence was 5.7% (interquartile range 0.4-14.4) and was even lower in patients with AF only detected by ILR (P = 0.001). Forty-eight % of the patients indicated symptoms via the patient activator but 33% of those recordings were not due to AF. Early AF recurrence (within 3 months) was highly associated with later AF recurrence (P < 0.001). AF burden >0.5% and longest AF episode >6 hours before the ablation were independent predictors of AF recurrence during intermittent but not continuous monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: After AF ablation, the AF burden was low throughout the 24 months follow-up. Nevertheless, symptoms were commonly indicated but one-third of patient-activated recordings did not show AF. Continuous monitoring was superior to intermittent follow-up in detecting AF episodes and assessing the AF burden.
Authors: Anna Björkenheim; Axel Brandes; Anders Magnuson; Alexander Chemnitz; Nils Edvardsson; Dritan Poçi Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-02-24 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Adam Hartley; Joseph Shalhoub; Fu Siong Ng; Andrew D Krahn; Zachary Laksman; Jason G Andrade; Marc W Deyell; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Markus B Sikkel Journal: Europace Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 5.214