Literature DB >> 27418296

Expression-level support for gene dosage sensitivity in three Glycine subgenus Glycine polyploids and their diploid progenitors.

Jeremy E Coate1, Michael J Song1, Aureliano Bombarely2, Jeff J Doyle3.   

Abstract

Retention or loss of paralogs following duplication correlates strongly with the function of the gene and whether the gene was duplicated by whole-genome duplication (WGD) or by small-scale duplication. Selection on relative gene dosage (to maintain proper stoichiometry among interacting proteins) has been invoked to explain these patterns of duplicate gene retention and loss. In order for gene dosage to be visible to natural selection, there must necessarily be a correlation between gene copy number and gene expression level (transcript abundance), but this has rarely been examined. We used RNA-Seq data from seven Glycine subgenus Glycine species (three recently formed allotetraploids and their four diploid progenitors) to determine if expression patterns and gene dosage responses at the level of transcription are consistent with selection on relative gene dosage. As predicted, metabolic pathways and gene ontologies that are putatively dosage-sensitive based on duplication history exhibited reduced expression variance across species, and more coordinated expression responses to recent WGD, relative to putatively dosage-insensitive networks. We conclude that selection on relative dosage has played an important role in shaping gene networks in Glycine.
© 2016 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2016 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Glycinezzm321990; gene balance hypothesis; gene dosage sensitivity; gene duplication; gene expression; polyploidy; tandem duplication

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27418296     DOI: 10.1111/nph.14090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  8 in total

1.  Genomic analysis reveals major determinants of cis-regulatory variation in Capsella grandiflora.

Authors:  Kim A Steige; Benjamin Laenen; Johan Reimegård; Douglas G Scofield; Tanja Slotte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Gene Dosage Balance Immediately following Whole-Genome Duplication in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Sunil K Kenchanmane Raju
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Gene Balance Predicts Transcriptional Responses Immediately Following Ploidy Change in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Michael J Song; Barney I Potter; Jeff J Doyle; Jeremy E Coate
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Reciprocally Retained Genes in the Angiosperm Lineage Show the Hallmarks of Dosage Balance Sensitivity.

Authors:  Setareh Tasdighian; Michiel Van Bel; Zhen Li; Yves Van de Peer; Lorenzo Carretero-Paulet; Steven Maere
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Concerted Divergence after Gene Duplication in Polycomb Repressive Complexes.

Authors:  Yichun Qiu; Shao-Lun Liu; Keith L Adams
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Genomic imbalance determines positive and negative modulation of gene expression in diploid maize.

Authors:  Xiaowen Shi; Hua Yang; Chen Chen; Jie Hou; Katherine M Hanson; Patrice S Albert; Tieming Ji; Jianlin Cheng; James A Birchler
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 12.085

7.  Foreign cry1Ac gene integration and endogenous borer stress-related genes synergistically improve insect resistance in sugarcane.

Authors:  Dinggang Zhou; Xiaolan Liu; Shiwu Gao; Jinlong Guo; Yachun Su; Hui Ling; Chunfeng Wang; Zhu Li; Liping Xu; Youxiong Que
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Distinct Expression and Methylation Patterns for Genes with Different Fates following a Single Whole-Genome Duplication in Flowering Plants.

Authors:  Tao Shi; Razgar Seyed Rahmani; Paul F Gugger; Muhua Wang; Hui Li; Yue Zhang; Zhizhong Li; Qingfeng Wang; Yves Van de Peer; Kathleen Marchal; Jinming Chen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.