Literature DB >> 2741815

Doppler echocardiographic measurement of low velocity motion of the left ventricular posterior wall.

K Isaaz1, A Thompson, G Ethevenot, J L Cloez, B Brembilla, C Pernot.   

Abstract

A new noninvasive method using pulsed Doppler echocardiography was developed to assess left ventricular (LV) posterior wall motion dynamics. Seventeen normal subjects and 23 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were prospectively studied. The sample volume was placed within the LV posterior wall endocardium just apical to the mitral valve sulcus using a posteriorly angulated low parasternal view. The wall filter was set at 100 Hz to record the low velocities of the LV posterior wall motion. The Doppler signal was morphologically similar to the rate of change of the LV posterior wall endocardium excursion obtained by a digitized M-mode echocardiogram, and showed 3 major waves: a systolic wave (S), an early diastolic wave (E) and a late diastolic wave (A). The peak velocities of LV posterior wall endocardium excursion were also determined by M-mode echocardiographic technique. We found a significant linear correlation between peak E-wave velocity and M-mode peak diastolic endocardial velocity (r = 0.90, p less than 0.001) and between peak S-wave velocity and M-mode peak systolic endocardial velocity (r = 0.81, p less than 0.001). M-mode peak systolic endocardial velocity showed an important overlap between control subjects and patients with normal and patients with abnormal LV posterior wall motion on the angiogram. In contrast, peak S-wave velocity was a better discriminator, and a peak S-wave velocity less than 7.5 cm/s was associated with abnormal LV posterior wall motion with an 83% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 95% accuracy. In patients with coronary artery disease but normal systolic LV posterior wall motion and normal global systolic LV function, peak S-wave velocity was not different when compared to control subjects. Peak E-wave velocity and E/A were significantly lower than in control subjects (p less than 0.01) and peak A-wave velocity was greater (p less than 0.01). In conclusion, these data suggest that pulsed Doppler echocardiography can be used for the direct analysis of LV posterior wall instantaneous low velocities and appears to be more informative than M-mode technique for systolic measurements. Thus, detection of abnormal LV posterior wall diastolic motion by pulsed Doppler echocardiography may, upon additional confirmation, be used as a new noninvasive method to gain insight into global LV diastolic performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2741815     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90655-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  50 in total

1.  Echocardiographic functional images based on tissue velocity information.

Authors:  L A Brodin; J van der Linden; B Olstad
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Tissue Doppler imaging: current and potential clinical applications.

Authors:  D J Price; D R Wallbridge; M J Stewart
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Doppler myocardial imaging in the assessment of normal and ischemic myocardial function--past, present and future.

Authors:  J M Strotmann; L Hatle; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with Doppler tissue imaging: effects of preload and place of measurements.

Authors:  Irem Dincer; Deniz Kumbasar; Gökhan Nergisoglu; Yusuf Atmaca; Sim Kutlay; Omer Akyurek; Tamer Sayin; Cetin Erol; Dervis Oral
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Tissue Doppler, strain, and strain rate echocardiography for the assessment of left and right systolic ventricular function.

Authors:  D Pellerin; R Sharma; P Elliott; C Veyrat
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Usefulness of mitral annular systolic velocity in the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction: comparison with three dimensional echocardiographic data.

Authors:  Yun Seon Park; Jae-Hyeong Park; Kye Taek Ahn; Won Il Jang; Hyung Seo Park; Jun Hyung Kim; Jae-Hwan Lee; Si Wan Choi; Jin-Ok Jeong; In-Whan Seong
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2010-03-31

7.  Left ventricular strain and peak systolic velocity: responses to controlled changes in load and contractility, explored in a porcine model.

Authors:  Roman A'roch; Ulf Gustafsson; Göran Johansson; Jan Poelaert; Michael Haney
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.062

8.  Tissue Doppler imaging--a sensible imaging option for the sensitive heart.

Authors:  Yat-Yin Lam; Wei Li; Michael Y Henein
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Strain and strain rate deformation parameters: from tissue Doppler to 2D speckle tracking.

Authors:  Harry Pavlopoulos; Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Pulsed tissue Doppler imaging of the left ventricular septal mitral annulus in healthy dogs.

Authors:  Jihye Choi; Hyunwook Kim; Junghee Yoon
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 1.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.