| Literature DB >> 27417983 |
Ying Wang1,2, Yanjun Shen1,2, Chenguang Feng2,3, Kai Zhao3, Zhaobin Song4, Yanping Zhang5, Liandong Yang1, Shunping He1.
Abstract
Tibetan loaches are the largest group of Tibetan fishes and are well adapted to the Tibetan Plateau. To investigate the origin of Tibetan loaches and their adaptations to the Tibetan Plateau, we determined 32 complete mitochondrial genomes that included 29 Tibetan loach species, two Barbatula species and Schistura longus. By combining these newly determined sequences with other previously published mitochondrial genomes, we assembled a large mitogenomic data set (11,433 bp) of 96 species in the superfamily Cobitoidea, to investigate the phylogenetic status of the genus Triplophysa. The resulting phylogeny strongly supported that the genus Triplophysa forms a monophyletic group within Nemacheilidae. Our molecular dating time suggests that the lineage leading to the Tibetan loaches and other loaches diverged approximately 23.5 Ma, which falls within the period of recent major uplifts of the Tibetan Plateau in the Early Miocene. Selection analyses revealed that the mitochondrial protein-coding genes of Tibetan loaches have larger ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions than do those of non-Tibetan loaches, indicating that Tibetan loaches accumulated more nonsynonymous mutations than non-Tibetan loaches and exhibited rapid evolution. Two positively selected sites were identified in the ATP8 and ND1 genes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27417983 PMCID: PMC4945904 DOI: 10.1038/srep29690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characterization of datasets used in this study.
| Genes | Alignment length | Parsimony informative sites | Variable sites | Nucleotide composition (%) | Ti/Tv | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | C | A | G | |||||
| Combined data | 11433 | 5387 | 6081 | 29.3 | 27.0 | 26.8 | 16.9 | 1.98 |
| 705 | 318 | 405 | 31.2 | 27.3 | 27.0 | 14.6 | 1.77 | |
| 165 | 87 | 117 | 26.0 | 28.5 | 32.5 | 13.0 | 2.11 | |
| 1539 | 590 | 649 | 30.5 | 25.5 | 25.3 | 18.7 | 2.08 | |
| 690 | 281 | 316 | 28.2 | 25.9 | 28.9 | 17.0 | 2.42 | |
| 783 | 317 | 350 | 28.3 | 27.8 | 26.3 | 17.6 | 2.08 | |
| 1134 | 513 | 557 | 29.6 | 27.6 | 26.9 | 15.9 | 2.09 | |
| 972 | 451 | 500 | 28.6 | 28.4 | 26.5 | 16.5 | 1.89 | |
| 1044 | 604 | 647 | 25.8 | 30.1 | 29.1 | 15.0 | 1.67 | |
| 348 | 181 | 190 | 31.2 | 27.4 | 24.8 | 16.5 | 2.64 | |
| 1380 | 680 | 787 | 28.7 | 27.5 | 28.0 | 15.8 | 2.04 | |
| 294 | 135 | 150 | 28.9 | 30.2 | 23.5 | 17.3 | 2.04 | |
| 1860 | 968 | 1113 | 28.7 | 27.6 | 28.8 | 14.9 | 1.99 | |
| 519 | 262 | 300 | 38.4 | 14.6 | 15.9 | 31.1 | 2.23 | |
Note: Ti = transition; Tv = transversion.
Figure 1Phylogenetic trees of loaches inferred from the 96 mitogenomes of Cobitoidae, reconstructed using RAxML and Bayesian inference methods.
At each node, the upper and lower rectangles with deferent colcor indicate the Bayesian posterior probability and the bootstrap value for the ML analyses, respectively. Branch lengths were estimated by using Bayesian inference method. (Scale bar represents 0.08 substitutions per site). Note: * represents the mitochondrial genome sequence has been sequenced in the previous study.
Figure 2Divergence times among loaches derived from the Bayesian relaxed-molecular clock method.
Numbers inside grey circles indicate the placement for the 4 calibrations used. Node bars indicate 95% credible intervals of the divergence time estimates.
Figure 3Selection pressure analysis and the positive genes identified for Triplophysa fishes.
(A) Comparisons of average dN/dS ratios for 13 individual protein-coding genes between Triplophysa fishes and Non-Triplophysa fishes. Note: *0.01 < P < 0.05, **0.001 < P < 0.01. (B) dN and dS estimated for the positive gene ATP8 using the FEL analysis method. The red arrow indicates the position of positive selected site. (C) dN and dS estimated for the positive gene ND1 using the FEL analysis method. The red arrow indicates the position of positive selected site.
Specimen information for sequenced species.
| Species | Species-voucher | Location |
|---|---|---|
| IHB201308861 | Gansu | |
| IHB201305756 | Gongshan province, Yunnan | |
| IHB201315814 | Fugong county, Yunnan | |
| IHB201308867 | Ertix River, Xinjiang | |
| IHB0908447 | Sichuan | |
| IHB201306600 | Baijia wholesale market of aquatic products, Chengdu | |
| IHB201306599 | Baijia wholesale market of aquatic products, Chengdu | |
| IHB201307124 | Jinchuanxia reservoir in Yongchang county, Gansu | |
| IHB201307126 | Dang river in Subei county, Gansu | |
| IHB0917490 | Niutou river in Qingshui county, Gansu | |
| IHB201307128 | Sunai county, Gansu | |
| IHB201306547 | Langcuo, Tibet | |
| IHB201306545 | Changchenmo river, Tibet | |
| IHB201305179 | Mulei river, Xinjiang | |
| NWIPB1106031 | Mafamu lake, Xinjiang | |
| NWIPB1106069 | Mafamu lake, Xinjiang | |
| NWIPB1206002 | Qihai lake | |
| NWIPB1109002 | Ganzi river, Qinghai | |
| NWIPB1250383 | Dari county, Qinghai | |
| NWIPB20070704 | Yalong river, Sichuan | |
| NWIPB1007001 | Cheerchen river, Qinghai | |
| SCU20130901 | Ruoergai river in Xiaman village, Sichuan | |
| NWIPB1006052 | Tiangeli river, Qinghai | |
| NWIPB1305230 | Tekesi river in Tekesi county, Qinghai | |
| SCU20090621 | Muli county, Sichuan | |
| SCU1010706 | Sichuan Taimen Protective Center in Qinghai Provincial Fishery Environmental Monitoring Center | |
| SCU20070912 | Zequ tributary of Dadu River in Rangtang county, Sichuan | |
| IHB201306570 | Anning tributary of Chishui river, Sichuan | |
| IHB201306572 | Anning tributary of Chishui river, Sichuan | |
| IHB201306569 | Xinyuan county, Xinjiang | |
| IHB201306543 | Xinyuan county, Xinjiang | |
| IHB00915689 | Pi river in Fugong county, Yunnan |
Note: IHB, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; SCU, Sichuan University; NWIPB, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.