| Literature DB >> 27417886 |
Lingling Wang1,2, Lei Wu3, Jiang Wu1.
Abstract
Objective MicroRNA-154 (miR-154) was previously reported to be downregulated in several types of human cancers and may act as a tumour suppressor. This study aimed to measure miR-154 levels and determine its clinical significance in human glioma. Methods This retrospective study analysed fresh human glioma specimens and non-neoplastic brain tissues using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to determine the relative levels of miR-154. The association between miR-154 levels and various clinicopathological characteristics and survival was analysed. Results A total of 115 patients with gliomas and 115 non-neoplastic brain tissues were examined. MiR-154 levels were significantly downregulated in gliomas compared with non-neoplastic brain tissues. Low levels of miR-154 were associated with high World Health Organization grade, large tumour size (≥ 5 cm), a low Karnofsky performance status score (< 80), and a shorter overall survival. Multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards regression model confirmed that decreased miR-154 level was an independent predictor of a poor prognosis. Conclusions These results suggest that miR-154 downregulation may be involved in glioma formation and progression, and that miR-154 might serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for patients with this disease.Entities:
Keywords: MicroRNA-154; glioma; prognosis; real-time quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27417886 PMCID: PMC5536553 DOI: 10.1177/0300060516649487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Figure 1.The relative levels of microRNA-154 (miR-154) in 115 glioma tissues and 115 non-neoplastic brain tissues (normal brain). Low-grade glioma refers to World Health Organization (WHO) grade I and II and high-grade glioma refers to WHO grade III and IV. The central black horizontal lines in each box are the mean values. The extremities of the box are the 25th and 75th percentiles. The error bars represent the minimum and maximum outliers.
Relationship between microRNA-154 (miR-154) levels and various clinicopathological characteristics in the 115 patients with gliomas who were studied.
| Clinicopathological characteristic |
| MiR-154 levels | Statistical significance[ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High, | Low, | |||
| Age at diagnosis, years | ||||
| < 50 | 57 | 32 (56.1) | 25 (43.9) | NS |
| ≥ 50 | 58 | 26 (44.8) | 32 (55.2) | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 66 | 35 (53.0) | 31 (47.0) | NS |
| Female | 49 | 23 (46.9) | 26 (53.1) | |
| WHO grade | ||||
| I + II | 38 | 28 (73.7) | 10 (26.3) | |
| III + IV | 77 | 30 (39.0) | 47 (61.0) | |
| Tumour size | ||||
| < 5 cm | 41 | 27 (65.9) | 14 (34.1) | |
| ≥ 5 cm | 74 | 31 (41.9) | 43 (58.1) | |
| KPS score | ||||
| < 80 | 68 | 24 (35.3) | 44 (64.7) | |
| ≥ 80 | 47 | 34 (72.3) | 13 (27.7) | |
Data presented as n of patients (%).
χ2-test.
WHO, World Health Organization; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; NS, no significant between-group difference (P ≥ 0.05).
Figure 2.Kaplan–Meier survival curves for patients with gliomas that had low miR-154 levels (n = 57) compared with those that had high miR-154 levels (n = 58). P < 0.001 for low level group compared with high level group; log-rank test.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of the clinicopathological characteristics associated with overall survival in 115 patients with glioma.
| Clinicopathological characteristic | Univariate Cox regression analysis, | Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis, | Relative risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis, years | |||
| < 50 versus ≥ 50 | NS | – | – |
| Sex | |||
| Male versus female | NS | – | – |
| Tumour size, cm | |||
| < 5 versus ≥ 5 | NS | – | – |
| WHO grade | |||
| I + II versus III + IV | 5.15 | ||
| KPS | |||
| < 80 versus ≥ 80 | 2.19 | ||
| MiR-154 level | |||
| High versus low | 5.86 |
WHO, World Health Organization; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; MiR, microRNA; NS, no significant difference (P ≥ 0.05).