Literature DB >> 27417545

Prevalence of bifid mandibular canals by cone beam computed tomography.

Maria Fernanda Lima Villaça-Carvalho1, Luiz Roberto Coutinho Manhães2, Mari Eli Leonelli de Moraes2, Sérgio Lúcio Pereira de Castro Lopes2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of bifid mandibular canals (BMC) by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined CT scans from 300 patients both male and female, aged 25 to 87 years. The subjects were divided into groups according to gender, male group (MG) and female group (FG) as well as subgroups according to the side, right (R) and left (L). Tomographic acquisitions were performed on the device I-Cat ® Classic. Image analysis was performed on the XoranCat ® software of the equipment itself, aided by image filters associated with transverse, oblique, and panoramic reconstruction cuts for analysis of the BMC. The results were displayed as descriptive analysis of the values and comparisons between factors were performed using ANOVA at a significance level of 95 %.
RESULTS: BMC was observed in 80 cases (26.67 %), of which, 39 (48.75 %) were in males and 41 (51.25 %) in females; no difference was seen between genders, neither by affected side, although the right side was more frequently affected (66.67 %) when both genders were combined.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of BMC is significant and should not be overlooked.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomic variation; Bifid mandibular canal; Cone beam computed tomography; Mandibular nerve

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27417545     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-016-0569-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  23 in total

1.  Bifid mandibular canals: cone beam computed tomography evaluation.

Authors:  A Kuribayashi; H Watanabe; A Imaizumi; W Tantanapornkul; K Katakami; T Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Failure to obtain adequate anaesthesia associated with a bifid mandibular canal: a case report.

Authors:  K Lew; G Townsen
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.291

Review 3.  Identification of double mandibular canals: literature review and three case reports with CT scans and cone beam CT.

Authors:  P Rouas; J Nancy; D Bar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Frederico Sampaio Neves; Monikelly Carmo Chagas Nascimento; Matheus Lima Oliveira; Solange Maria Almeida; Frab Norberto Bóscolo
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-08-24

5.  Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Lucy Naomi Shiratori; Juliana Marotti; Júlio Yamanouchi; Israel Chilvarquer; Ivo Contin; Pedro Tortamano-Neto
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures.

Authors:  Munetaka Naitoh; Kino Nakahara; Yutaka Suenaga; Kenichi Gotoh; Shintaro Kondo; Eiichiro Ariji
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-01

7.  Assessment of variations of the mandibular canal through cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Christiano de Oliveira-Santos; Paulo Henrique Couto Souza; Soraya de Azambuja Berti-Couto; Lien Stinkens; Kristin Moyaert; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Bifid mandibular canals and the factors associated with their presence: a medical computed tomography evaluation in a Taiwanese population.

Authors:  Earl Fu; Michelle Peng; Cheng-Yang Chiang; Hsiao-Pei Tu; Yaoh-Shiang Lin; E-Chin Shen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Bifid mandibular canal.

Authors:  J M Sanchis; Miguel Peñarrocha; F Soler
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 10.  Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology.

Authors:  N L Frederiksen
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1995-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Prevalence of bifid mandibular canal according to gender, type and side.

Authors:  Özlem Okumuş; Asım Dumlu
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.080

2.  Prevalence and Characterization of bifid mandibular Canal Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Cristalle Soman; Tariq Wahass; Hatem Alahmari; Nader Alamri; Assaf Albiebi; Mohammed Alhabashy; Abdulrahman Talha; Nasser Alqhtani
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2022-09-30

3.  A Two-Year Follow-Up Assessment of Decreasing Crestal Bone Levels Around Dental Implants in Patients Rehabilitated With Mandibular Implant Overdentures.

Authors:  Prince Kumar; Brajesh Dammani; Monica Jaideep Mahajani; Vinay H Vadvadgi; Rashmi Jawade; Mohit V Patil
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-11

Review 4.  New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies.

Authors:  Supreet Jain; Kartik Choudhary; Ravleen Nagi; Stuti Shukla; Navneet Kaur; Deepak Grover
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2019-09-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.