Christina M Dahmcke1, Kenneth E Steven2, Louise K Larsen1, Asger L Poulsen3, Ahmad Abdul-Al1, Christina Dahl1, Per Guldberg4. 1. Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Department of Urology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark. 3. Kirurgisk Urologisk Klinik, Rødovre, Denmark. 4. Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: perg@cancer.dk.
Abstract
Retrospective studies have provided proof of principle that bladder cancer can be detected by testing for the presence of tumor DNA in urine. We have conducted a prospective blinded study to determine whether a urine-based DNA test can replace flexible cystoscopy in the initial assessment of gross hematuria. A total of 475 consecutive patients underwent standard urological examination including flexible cystoscopy and computed tomography urography, and provided urine samples immediately before (n=461) and after (n=444) cystoscopy. Urine cells were collected using a filtration device and tested for eight DNA mutation and methylation biomarkers. Clinical evaluation identified 99 (20.8%) patients with urothelial bladder tumors. With this result as a reference and based on the analysis of all urine samples, the DNA test had a sensitivity of 97.0%, a specificity of 76.9%, a positive predictive value of 52.5%, and a negative predictive value of 99.0%. In three patients with a positive urine-DNA test without clinical evidence of cancer, a tumor was detected at repeat cystoscopy within 16 mo. Our results suggest that urine-DNA testing can be used to identify a large subgroup of patients with gross hematuria in whom cystoscopy is not required. PATIENT SUMMARY: We tested the possibility of using a urine-based DNA test to check for bladder cancer in patients with visible blood in the urine. Our results show that the test efficiently detects bladder cancer and therefore may be used to greatly reduce the number of patients who would need to undergo cystoscopy.
Retrospective studies have provided proof of principle that bladder cancer can be detected by testing for the presence of tumor DNA in urine. We have conducted a prospective blinded study to determine whether a urine-based DNA test can replace flexible cystoscopy in the initial assessment of gross hematuria. A total of 475 consecutive patients underwent standard urological examination including flexible cystoscopy and computed tomography urography, and provided urine samples immediately before (n=461) and after (n=444) cystoscopy. Urine cells were collected using a filtration device and tested for eight DNA mutation and methylation biomarkers. Clinical evaluation identified 99 (20.8%) patients with urothelial bladder tumors. With this result as a reference and based on the analysis of all urine samples, the DNA test had a sensitivity of 97.0%, a specificity of 76.9%, a positive predictive value of 52.5%, and a negative predictive value of 99.0%. In three patients with a positive urine-DNA test without clinical evidence of cancer, a tumor was detected at repeat cystoscopy within 16 mo. Our results suggest that urine-DNA testing can be used to identify a large subgroup of patients with gross hematuria in whom cystoscopy is not required. PATIENT SUMMARY: We tested the possibility of using a urine-based DNA test to check for bladder cancer in patients with visible blood in the urine. Our results show that the test efficiently detects bladder cancer and therefore may be used to greatly reduce the number of patients who would need to undergo cystoscopy.
Authors: Herney Andrés García-Perdomo; Juan Pablo Usubillaga-Velasquez; James Alejandro Zapata-Copete; Leonardo Oliveira Reis Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-04-27 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Andrew Feber; Pawan Dhami; Liqin Dong; Patricia de Winter; Wei Shen Tan; Mónica Martínez-Fernández; Dirk S Paul; Antony Hynes-Allen; Sheida Rezaee; Pratik Gurung; Simon Rodney; Ahmed Mehmood; Felipe Villacampa; Federico de la Rosa; Charles Jameson; Kar Keung Cheng; Maurice P Zeegers; Richard T Bryan; Nicholas D James; Jesus M Paramio; Alex Freeman; Stephan Beck; John D Kelly Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 6.551
Authors: Wei Shen Tan; Andrew Feber; Liqin Dong; Rachael Sarpong; Sheida Rezaee; Simon Rodney; Pramit Khetrapal; Patricia de Winter; Frelyn Ocampo; Rumana Jalil; Norman R Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; John D Kelly Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Heidi D Pharo; Kim Andresen; Kaja C G Berg; Ragnhild A Lothe; Marine Jeanmougin; Guro E Lind Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 6.551