| Literature DB >> 27416815 |
L La Spada1, T M McManus1, A Dyke2, S Haq2, L Zhang1, Q Cheng1, Y Hao1.
Abstract
Recently, a great deal of interest has been re-emerged on the possibility to manipulate surface waves, in particular, towards the THz and optical regime. Both concepts of Transformation Optics (TO) and metamaterials have been regarded as one of key enablers for such applications in applied electromagnetics. In this paper, we experimentally demonstrate for the first time a dielectric surface wave cloak from engineered gradient index materials to illustrate the possibility of using nanocomposites to control surface wave propagation through advanced additive manufacturing. The device is designed analytically and validated through numerical simulations and measurements, showing good agreement and performance as an effective surface wave cloak. The underlying design approach has much wider applications, which span from microwave to optics for the control of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) and radiation of nanoantennas.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27416815 PMCID: PMC4945873 DOI: 10.1038/srep29363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Cosine-shaped surface deformation: (a) top-view and (b) side-view; Schematic indicating the required permittivity values for each layer (c); 3D printed prototype of the cloak structure with cross-section inset (d); Fabricated surface wave structures: (e) plane view of the samples and (f) the three composite structures manufactured.
Figure 2(a) Numerical setup for surface wave cloaking device; (b) Experimental setup for detecting surface waves on devices.
Figure 33D measurements of the E-field on the curved surface for (a) UDS and (b) GIS. Surface Wave Spatial Frequency Spectrum for (c) numerical and (d) experimental results, at 10.0 GHz.
Figure 4(a) Ez (real part) comparison for all the three samples in terms of analytical, numerical and experimental model along the x-y plane; Magnitude (real part) comparison for the normal electric field Ez for (b) FP – UDS and (c) FP –GIS. (λ0 = 30 mm, f0 = 10 GHz).
Figure 5Ez (real part) comparison for all the three samples in terms of analytical, numerical and experimental model along the x-y plane (λ0 = 30 mm): at (a) 8 GHz and (b) 9 GHz.