Literature DB >> 27414395

Optimal sampling frequency in recording of resistance training exercises.

Paolo Bardella1, Irene Carrasquilla García2, Marco Pozzo3,4, Julio Tous-Fajardo5, Eduardo Saez de Villareal2,3, Luis Suarez-Arrones2,3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyse the raw lifting speed collected during four different resistance training exercises to assess the optimal sampling frequency. Eight physically active participants performed sets of Squat Jumps, Countermovement Jumps, Squats and Bench Presses at a maximal lifting speed. A linear encoder was used to measure the instantaneous speed at a 200 Hz sampling rate. Subsequently, the power spectrum of the signal was computed by evaluating its Discrete Fourier Transform. The sampling frequency needed to reconstruct the signals with an error of less than 0.1% was f99.9 = 11.615 ± 2.680 Hz for the exercise exhibiting the largest bandwidth, with the absolute highest individual value being 17.467 Hz. There was no difference between sets in any of the exercises. Using the closest integer sampling frequency value (25 Hz) yielded a reconstruction of the signal up to 99.975 ± 0.025% of its total in the worst case. In conclusion, a sampling rate of 25 Hz or above is more than adequate to record raw speed data and compute power during resistance training exercises, even under the most extreme circumstances during explosive exercises. Higher sampling frequencies provide no increase in the recording precision and may instead have adverse effects on the overall data quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sampling frequency; bandwidth; lifting speed; linear encoder; power spectrum

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27414395     DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2016.1205652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Biomech        ISSN: 1476-3141            Impact factor:   2.832


  3 in total

1.  In-season eccentric-overload training in elite soccer players: Effects on body composition, strength and sprint performance.

Authors:  Luis Suarez-Arrones; Eduardo Saez de Villarreal; Francisco Javier Núñez; Valter Di Salvo; Cristian Petri; Alessandro Buccolini; Rafael Angel Maldonado; Nacho Torreno; Alberto Mendez-Villanueva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Video-Based System for Automatic Measurement of Barbell Velocity in Back Squat.

Authors:  Basilio Pueo; Jose J Lopez; Jose M Mossi; Adrian Colomer; Jose M Jimenez-Olmedo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Concurrent validity of barbell force measured from video-based barbell kinematics during the snatch in male elite weightlifters.

Authors:  Ingo Sandau; Helmi Chaabene; Urs Granacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.