Literature DB >> 27413583

ASPECT-R-A Tool to Rate the Pragmatic and Explanatory Characteristics of a Clinical Trial Design.

Larry D Alphs1, Cynthia A Bossie1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinical and observational trials can be broadly categorized into having explanatory or pragmatic approaches with specific trial designs located somewhere along this spectrum. Two 10-domain instruments, the PRECIS and Pragmascope, have been developed to facilitate clinical trial design within a framework that is either more explanatory or pragmatic.
DESIGN: We have adapted the PRECIS and Pragmascope instruments to permit both design support and post-hoc evaluation of clinical trials and to improve consistency of use and interpretation across raters. This adapted instrument, A Study Pragmatic-Explanatory Characterization Tool-Rating-or ASPECT-R-is described.
RESULTS: Adaption of the PRECIS and Pragmascope instruments included reducing the 10 original domains to six. Each of the six ASPECT-R domains has a definition of domain terminology and detailed descriptive anchors. The domains are rated from 0 to 6, where 0 is considered extremely explanatory and 6 extremely pragmatic. Using an Excel®-based file with cover page cells for entry of the study objective(s) and study population of interest, the ASPECT-R instrument has individual domain-related worksheets where the user rates each of the six domains. Each of the six domain worksheets has a section provided for the user to summarize and record the rationale for their domain scoring. Each domain worksheet page also contains a radar graph that auto-populates each of the domain ratings as the user completes these ratings.
CONCLUSION: This new tool, ASPECT-R, should provide a reliable, objective way to rate studies along the explanatory-pragmatic spectrum that will better support trial design and facilitate interpretation of completed trials. The complete ASPECT-R tool and guide materials can be accessed online by clicking or visiting this link: http://innovationscns.com/aspect-r-tool-and-training-materials/.

Keywords:  ASPECT-R; explanatory; pragmatic; trial design

Year:  2016        PMID: 27413583      PMCID: PMC4896825     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 2158-8333


  2 in total

1.  A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers.

Authors:  Kevin E Thorpe; Merrick Zwarenstein; Andrew D Oxman; Shaun Treweek; Curt D Furberg; Douglas G Altman; Sean Tunis; Eduardo Bergel; Ian Harvey; David J Magid; Kalipso Chalkidou
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Pragmatic vs explanatory trials: the pragmascope tool to help measure differences in protocols of mental health randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Graeme Tosh; Karla Soares-Weiser; Clive E Adams
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 5.986

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS).

Authors:  Jan Wirsching; Sophie Graßmann; Fabian Eichelmann; Laura Malin Harms; Matthew Schenk; Eva Barth; Alide Berndzen; Moses Olalekan; Leen Sarmini; Hedwig Zuberer; Krasimira Aleksandrova
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?

Authors:  Rafael Dal-Ré; Perrine Janiaud; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 8.775

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.