BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training is currently embedded in most health professions education curricula. Without evidence for how trainees think about their simulation-based learning, some training techniques may not support trainees' learning strategies. OBJECTIVE: This study explored how residents think about and self-regulate learning during a lumbar puncture (LP) training session using a simulator. METHODS: In 2010, 20 of 45 postgraduate year 1 internal medicine residents attended a mandatory procedural skills training boot camp. Independently, residents practiced the entire LP skill on a part-task trainer using a clinical LP tray and proper sterile technique. We interviewed participants regarding how they thought about and monitored their learning processes, and then we conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data. RESULTS: The analysis suggested that participants considered what they could and could not learn from the simulator; they developed their self-confidence by familiarizing themselves with the LP equipment and repeating the LP algorithmic steps. Participants articulated an idiosyncratic model of learning they used to interpret the challenges and successes they experienced. Participants reported focusing on obtaining cerebrospinal fluid and memorizing the "routine" version of the LP procedure. They did not report much thinking about their learning strategies (eg, self-questioning). CONCLUSIONS: During simulation-based training, residents described assigning greater weight to achieving procedural outcomes and tended to think that the simulated task provided them with routine, generalizable skills. Over this typical 1-hour session, trainees did not appear to consider their strategic mindfulness (ie, awareness and use of learning strategies).
BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training is currently embedded in most health professions education curricula. Without evidence for how trainees think about their simulation-based learning, some training techniques may not support trainees' learning strategies. OBJECTIVE: This study explored how residents think about and self-regulate learning during a lumbar puncture (LP) training session using a simulator. METHODS: In 2010, 20 of 45 postgraduate year 1 internal medicine residents attended a mandatory procedural skills training boot camp. Independently, residents practiced the entire LP skill on a part-task trainer using a clinical LP tray and proper sterile technique. We interviewed participants regarding how they thought about and monitored their learning processes, and then we conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data. RESULTS: The analysis suggested that participants considered what they could and could not learn from the simulator; they developed their self-confidence by familiarizing themselves with the LP equipment and repeating the LP algorithmic steps. Participants articulated an idiosyncratic model of learning they used to interpret the challenges and successes they experienced. Participants reported focusing on obtaining cerebrospinal fluid and memorizing the "routine" version of the LP procedure. They did not report much thinking about their learning strategies (eg, self-questioning). CONCLUSIONS: During simulation-based training, residents described assigning greater weight to achieving procedural outcomes and tended to think that the simulated task provided them with routine, generalizable skills. Over this typical 1-hour session, trainees did not appear to consider their strategic mindfulness (ie, awareness and use of learning strategies).
Authors: Steven J Durning; Timothy J Cleary; John Sandars; Paul Hemmer; Patricia Kokotailo; Anthony R Artino Journal: Acad Med Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Ryan Brydges; Julian Manzone; David Shanks; Rose Hatala; Stanley J Hamstra; Benjamin Zendejas; David A Cook Journal: Med Educ Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Mikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen; Troels Wienecke; Helle Thagesen; Rikke Borre Vita Jacobsen; Yousif Subhi; Ryan Brydges; Charlotte Ringsted; Lars Konge Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 5.128