| Literature DB >> 27413379 |
Tae Hwan Shin1, Geetika Phukan2, Jeom Soon Shim2, Duc-Toan Nguyen3, Yongman Kim4, Justin D Oh-Lee5, Hyeon-Seong Lee2, Man Jeong Paik6, Gwang Lee2.
Abstract
We investigated changes in PA levels by the treatment ofEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27413379 PMCID: PMC4927980 DOI: 10.1155/2016/4612531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Int Impact factor: 5.443
Figure 12,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining and hBM-MSC staining with anti-NuMA antibody, PKH-26, and DAPI. (a) TTC-stained coronal brain sections of control (upper panel) and 5 days after MCAo (bottom panel). Scale bar = 5 mm. (b) hBM-MSCs labelled 5 days after MCAo. The localization of hBM-MSCs in the ischemic region was identified by NuMA (green), PKH-26 (red), and DAPI (blue); white arrows indicate double-positive cell. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Polyamine levels in brain tissues from rats in the control group, group with transient MCAo, and the MCAo group following transplantation with hBM-MSCs.
| Number | Compound | Polyamine levels (nmol, mean ± SD) in rat brain tissue (g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | Control + hBM-MSCs group ( | MCAo group ( | MCAo + hBM-MSCs group ( |
| ||
| 1 |
| 374.7 ± 15.3 | 365.6 ± 12.0 (0.1)a | 382.3 ± 22.8 (0.2)b | 376.6 ± 15.0 (0.4)c | 0.3 |
| 2 |
| 419.2 ± 17.7 | 408.3 ± 13.8 (0.1) | 428.1 ± 26.9 (0.2) | 421.1 ± 14.7 (0.4) | 0.3 |
| 3 | Putrescine | 109.3 ± 5.0 | 107.4 ± 3.6 (0.2) | 141.9 ± 14.2 (0.000003) | 129.7 ± 13.6 (0.0003) | 0.06 |
| 4 | Cadaverine | 59.5 ± 5.3 | 64.9 ± 11.9 (0.1) | 73.7 ± 9.8 (0.0008) | 62.4 ± 5.2 (0.1) | 0.01 |
| 5 |
| 137.0 ± 9.9 | 145.1 ± 19.3 (0.1) | 176.6 ± 24.4 (0.0002) | 158.0 ± 25.7 (0.02) | 0.1 |
| 6 |
| 231.8 ± 10.4 | 225.6 ± 6.9 (0.1) | 244.2 ± 14.6 (0.03) | 235.5 ± 9.3 (0.2) | 0.1 |
| 7 | Spermidine | 172.6 ± 13.8 | 201.4 ± 13.4 (0.0003) | 248.4 ± 44.3 (0.00006) | 208.6 ± 37.6 (0.007) | 0.05 |
| 8 |
| 140.7 ± 24.2 | 138.2 ± 28.8 (0.4) | 138.4 ± 20.5 (0.4) | 130.7 ± 21.2 (0.2) | 0.3 |
| 9 | Spermine | 513.6 ± 21.3 | 503.5 ± 19.4 (0.2) | 520.7 ± 30.4 (0.3) | 513.6 ± 18.4 (0.5) | 0.3 |
aStudent's t-test at 95% confidence level on the mean values of control and control + hBM-MSCs groups.
bStudent's t-test at 95% confidence level on the mean values of control and MCAo groups.
cStudent's t-test at 95% confidence level on the mean values of control and MCAo + hBM-MSCs groups.
dStudent's t-test at 95% confidence level on the mean values of MCAo and MCAo + hBM-MSCs groups.
Figure 2Bar plot of MCAo and MCAo + hBM-MSCs groups based on mean levels of the nine polyamines in rat brain tissues as variables after normalization to the corresponding mean values of the control group. # p < 0.05 (comparison with control) and p < 0.05 (comparison between MCAo and MCAo + hBM-MSCs groups). Data shown are means ± SE for three independent experiments.
Figure 3GC-SIM-MS chromatograms of putrescine (1), cadaverine (2), and spermidine (3) in rat brain tissues from control (a), MCAo (b), and MCAo + hBM-MSCs groups (c). IS: internal standard (1,6-diaminohexane).
Polyamine levels in cells from control, OGD, and OGD + hBM-MSCs groups for 72 h.
| Number | Compound | Polyamine levels (ng, mean ± SD) in cells (4 × 105) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | OGD group ( | OGD + hBM-MSCs group ( |
| ||
| 1 |
| NDd | ND | ND | |
| 2 |
| ND | ND | ND | |
| 3 | Putrescine | 16.4 ± 1.5 | 21.8 ± 0.9 (0.002)a | 28.1 ± 0.9 (0.0003)b | 0.001 |
| 4 | Cadaverine | 12.5 ± 0.2 | 12.4 ± 0.4 (0.794) | 12.6 ± 0.3 (0.861) | 0.501 |
| 5 |
| 45.6 ± 1.8 | 66.5 ± 0.8 (0.0003) | 54.3 ± 4.7 (0.026) | 0.006 |
| 6 |
| 64.4 ± 0.6 | 56.7 ± 4.0 (0.047) | 50.1 ± 3.3 (0.03) | 0.082 |
| 7 | Spermidine | 132.5 ± 3.0 | 212.1 ± 16.7 (0.0002) | 180.4 ± 6.9 (0.004) | 0.024 |
| 8 |
| 63.4 ± 6.0 | 127.3 ± 9.7 (0.0005) | 110.6 ± 0.6 (0.0005) | 0.050 |
| 9 | Spermine | 64.9 ± 6.2 | 243.8 ± 15.1 (0.0002) | 177.6 ± 9.5 (0.0003) | 0.001 |
aOne-way ANOVA, p value < 0.05 between control and OGD groups.
bOne-way ANOVA, p value < 0.05 between control and OGD + hBM-MSCs groups.
cOne-way ANOVA, p value < 0.05 between OGD and OGD + hBM-MSCs groups.
dNot determined.
Figure 4Star symbol plots of OGD and OGD + hBM-MSCs groups based on the mean levels of the seven polyamines in cultured cells for 72 h as the variables after normalization to the corresponding control group mean values. p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 (comparison between OGD and OGD + hBM-MSCs groups). Data shown are means ± SE for three independent experiments.
Figure 5GC-SIM-MS chromatograms of putrescine (1), N 1-acetylspermidine (2), spermidine (3), N 1-acetylspermine (4), and spermine (5) in cells from control (a), OGD (b), and cocultured OGD cells (c) with hBM-MSCs for 72 h. IS: internal standard (1,6-diaminohexane).