Literature DB >> 27413129

ShopSmart 4 Health: results of a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among socioeconomically disadvantaged women.

Kylie Ball1, Sarah A McNaughton2, Ha Nd Le3, Gavin Abbott2, Lena D Stephens2, David A Crawford2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Behavioral interventions show potential for promoting increased fruit and vegetable consumption in the general population. However, little is known about their effectiveness or cost-effectiveness among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, who are less likely to consume adequate fruit and vegetables.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects and costs of a behavior change intervention for increasing fruit and vegetable purchasing and consumption among socioeconomically disadvantaged women.
DESIGN: ShopSmart 4 Health was a randomized controlled trial involving a 3-mo retrospective baseline data collection phase [time (T) 0], a 6-mo intervention (T1-T2), and a 6-mo no-intervention follow-up (T3). Socioeconomically disadvantaged women who were primary household shoppers in Melbourne, Australia, were randomly assigned to either a behavior change intervention arm (n = 124) or a control arm (n = 124). Supermarket transaction (sales) data and surveys measured the main outcomes: fruit and vegetable purchases and self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption.
RESULTS: An analysis of supermarket transaction data showed no significant intervention effects on vegetable or fruit purchasing at T2 or T3. Participants in the behavior change intervention arm reported consumption of significantly more vegetables during the intervention (T2) than did controls, with smaller intervention effects sustained at 6 mo postintervention (T3). Relative to controls, vegetable consumption increased by ∼0.5 serving · participant(-1) · d(-1) from baseline to T2 and remained 0.28 servings/d higher than baseline at T3 among those who received the intervention. There was no intervention effect on reported fruit consumption. The behavior change intervention cost A$3.10 (in Australian dollars) · increased serving of vegetables(-1) · d(-1)
CONCLUSIONS: This behavioral intervention increased vegetable consumption among socioeconomically disadvantaged women. However, the lack of observed effects on fruit consumption and on both fruit and vegetable purchasing at intervention stores suggests that further investigation of effective nutrition promotion approaches for this key target group is required. The ShopSmart 4 Health trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as ISRCTN48771770.
© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disadvantaged women; fruit and vegetables; nutrition intervention; randomized controlled trial; socioeconomic disadvantage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27413129     DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.116.133173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  10 in total

1.  Cost-Benefit and Cost-Utility Analyses to Demonstrate the Potential Value-for-Money of Supermarket Shelf Tags Promoting Healthier Packaged Products in Australia.

Authors:  Jaithri Ananthapavan; Gary Sacks; Liliana Orellana; Josephine Marshall; Ella Robinson; Marj Moodie; Miranda Blake; Amy Brown; Rob Carter; Adrian J Cameron
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  A randomized-controlled trial focusing on socio-economic status for promoting vegetable intake among adults using a web-based nutrition intervention programme: study protocol.

Authors:  Saki Nakamura; Takayo Inayama; Takashi Arao
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Reduction in Vegetable Intake Disparities With a Web-Based Nutrition Education Intervention Among Lower-Income Adults in Japan: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Saki Nakamura; Takayo Inayama; Kazuhiro Harada; Takashi Arao
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Examining Shopping Patterns, Use of Food-Related Resources, and Proposed Solutions to Improve Healthy Food Access Among Food Insecure and Food Secure Eastern North Carolina Residents.

Authors:  Mary Jane Lyonnais; Ann P Rafferty; Stephanie Jilcott Pitts; Rebecca J Blanchard; Archana P Kaur
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The Role of a Food Literacy Intervention in Promoting Food Security and Food Literacy-OzHarvest's NEST Program.

Authors:  Elisha G West; Rebecca Lindberg; Kylie Ball; Sarah A McNaughton
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  What is known about consumer nutrition environments in Australia? A scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  C E Pulker; L E Thornton; G S A Trapp
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2018-05-21

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Health-Promoting Food Retail-Based Interventions.

Authors:  Huong Ngoc Quynh Tran; Emma McMahon; Marj Moodie; Jaithri Ananthapavan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  A systematic review of supermarket automated electronic sales data for population dietary surveillance.

Authors:  Victoria L Jenneson; Francesca Pontin; Darren C Greenwood; Graham P Clarke; Michelle A Morris
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.846

9.  Grocery store interventions to change food purchasing behaviors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Filippo Bianchi; Carmen Piernas; Sarah Payne Riches; Kerstin Frie; Rebecca Nourse; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Evaluation of an intervention to provide brief support and personalized feedback on food shopping to reduce saturated fat intake (PC-SHOP): A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carmen Piernas; Paul Aveyard; Charlotte Lee; Melina Tsiountsioura; Michaela Noreik; Nerys M Astbury; Jason Oke; Claire Madigan; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 11.069

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.