| Literature DB >> 27413104 |
Louise Mc Grath-Lone1, Katie Harron2, Lorraine Dearden3, Bilal Nasim4, Ruth Gilbert5.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Looked-after children; administrative data; childhood adversity; children in care
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27413104 PMCID: PMC5005948 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Epidemiol ISSN: 0300-5771 Impact factor: 7.196
Coverage of data in the Children Looked After Return (1992 to 2016)
|
|
Measures collected by Children Looked After Return
| Child characteristics | Episode information | Indicators and outcomes of care | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
For all children in care
Unique Pupil Number Is a girl in care a mother? Is the child in care an unaccompanied asylum seeker? |
For all children in care
Unique Reference Number of placement provider
For children in continuous care for 12 months Home postcode when entering care Placement postcode Distance between placement and home |
For all children in care Start and end dates of any period that child was missing from care Is the child re-entering care after the breakdown of a permanent placement? For children re-entering care after the breakdown of a permanent placement Type of permanent arrangement Date of exit to this permanent arrangement The local authority where the child was previously looked after For children in continuous care for 20 days Date of statutory review Child’s participation in the review For children who are placed for adoption Date the decision to be placed for adoption was made Date child and prospective adopters were matched Date of adoption Number of prospective adopters Gender of prospective adopters Marital status of prospective adopters Date decision that a child should no longer be placed for adoption was made Reason why a child should no longer be placed for adoption |
For children in continuous care for 12 months Was the child convicted during the year (if aged > 10 years)? Are health surveillance checks up to date (if aged < 5 years)? Are immunizations up to date? Were the child’s teeth checked by a dentist during the year? Are annual health assessments up to date? Was the child identified as having a substance misuse problem? Was the child offered an intervention for substance misuse problem? Was the child eligible to take GCSE examinations? What was the child doing when aged 16 or over (e.g. in school, employment)? Strengths & Difficulties Questionnaire score For care leavers Was the local authority in touch with the young person during the year? What was the child doing on their birthday (i.e. in education, employment)? What type of accommodation was the child living in on their birthday? Was the accommodation suitable? |
The years in which these variables were collected in the CLA vary and are described in full in official Department for Education guidance. The underlined variables are available for request from the Department for Education through the National Pupil Dataset team. Other variables are not routinely available to researchers, but can be requested. *Care episodes recorded in CLA are funded by the state via local authorities, but may be delivered on their behalf through approved private organizations (e.g. a looked-after child may be placed with an agency foster carer or in a children’s home run by a charity).