Literature DB >> 27411491

Prevalence and determinants of preconception folic acid use: an Italian multicenter survey.

Roy M Nilsen1,2, Emanuele Leoncini3, Paolo Gastaldi4, Valentina Allegri5, Rocco Agostino6, Francesca Faravelli7, Federica Ferrazzoli8, Enrico Finale9, Paolo Ghirri10, Gioacchino Scarano11, Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women in many countries are advised to use folic acid supplements before and early during pregnancy to reduce the risk of neural tube defects in their infants. This study aimed to update the prevalence and to identify possible determinants of preconception folic acid supplement use in Italian women.
METHODS: The study was based on cross-sectional data from seven maternity clinics located in six Italian regions from January to June, 2012. Data on maternal characteristics and supplement use were collected for 2,189 women using a self-administered questionnaire.
RESULTS: Preconception folic acid use was reported by 23.5 % (n = 515) of the participants. Of these, 479 (93 %) women had taken folic acid supplements on a daily basis as recommended by the health authorities. Women who both had intended their pregnancy and had requested a preconception health visit to a doctor/gynecologist were substantially more likely than the reference group to initiate folic acid supplementation before their pregnancy (48.6 versus 4.8 %). Preconception folic acid use was also associated with higher maternal age, higher education, marriage/cohabitation, lower parity, infertility treatments, and chronic disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Data from seven maternity clinics located in six Italian regions indicate that preconception folic acid supplement use in many Italian women is low. Women who do not plan their pregnancy or do not request a preconception health visit to their doctor have among the lowest prevalence of preconception folic acid use. Improving folate status in these and other supplemental non-users may have important disease preventive effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Folic acid; Italy; Neural tube defects; Predictors; Pregnancy; Supplementation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27411491      PMCID: PMC4944255          DOI: 10.1186/s13052-016-0278-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital J Pediatr        ISSN: 1720-8424            Impact factor:   2.638


Background

Health authorities in many countries around the World recommend women of reproductive age to use folic acid supplements before and early in pregnancy to reduce the risk of having a baby with a neural tube defect [1-3]. The recommendations usually indicate a dose of 0.4 mg folic acid daily from at least one month before pregnancy until the third month of gestation. In addition to such recommendations, a number of countries have also introduced mandatory food fortification of grains with folic acid to increase intake of this B-vitamin in fertile women. In these countries, a risk reduction of neural tube defect has been reported [4-7]. Mandatory food fortification with folic acid has not yet been introduced in any European country [3, 8]. Enhanced sources of folate are only available from folic acid supplements, voluntary fortification, and intake of foods rich in folates, such as vegetables and fruits. Although the prevalence of preconception folic acid supplementation in Europe has increased after many years of delivered recommendations, a large portion of women still does not follow the recommendations and many start supplementation to late with respect to neural tube defect prevention [9]. Additionally, the total prevalence of neural tube defects in Europe has not declined markedly over the years [3, 10, 11]. This has led to a debate regarding the efficiency of folic acid recommendations in Europe and other countries [12, 13]. In order to identify groups of women who do not follow the recommendations, many researchers have explored the possible determinants of use or non-use of folic acid supplements. Typically, pregnancy intention, preconception health visit to a doctor, and higher educational level are strong correlates for taking folic acid supplements [14-18], while higher parity, shorter and longer interpregnancy intervals, maternal smoking before pregnancy, and lower maternal age are often associated with less use [15-19]. Such information is valuable and can be used to design intervention programs to improve the preconception folic acid supplement use overall and in subgroups of women related to low use. In Italy, the official recommendations from April 2004 state that all women planning a pregnancy and those who do not actively exclude the possibility of becoming pregnant should take a daily folic acid supplement of at least 0.4 mg from one month before conception and continue throughout the first trimester [20, 21]. With a prescription from a doctor, this dose or higher is free of charge in Italy since 2005 [22]. Since the folic acid recommendations were issued in 2004, information on the determinants of supplement use in Italian women is limited [14, 23, 24]. This study, therefore, aimed to update the Italian prevalence and to identify possible determinants of preconception folic acid supplement use in Italian women using data from a recent Italian multicenter survey on preconception health.

Methods

Study population

The current study drew on resources of a multicenter study initially established to examine the prevalence and the determinants of a variety of preconception risk factors (including preconception folic acid supplement use) in Italian women [25]. It was conducted between January and June, 2012, in seven maternity clinics located in six different regions: Castelli Hospital (Verbania, Piemonte), Vaio Hospital (Fidenza, Emilia-Romagna), Galliera Hospital (Genova, Liguria), Santa Chiara Hospital (Pisa, Toscana), S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli Hospital, and Santo Spirito Hospital (Roma, Lazio), Rummo Hospital (Benevento, Campania). The study was approved by the ethical committee of the S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli Hospital (parere 55/2011). The data collection of the present study has been described elsewhere [25]. All women eligible for the study were invited to fill in a self-administered questionnaire comprising 35 initial questions on various topics, including vitamin supplement use, pregnancy-related risk factors, and maternal background characteristics. Personal information such as names, address, or birth date was not recorded. In Verbania (n = 320), women were recruited during pregnancy (usually at their first prenatal visits), while in the other six maternity clinics (n = 1,892) mothers were recruited during hospitalization after giving birth [25]. Mothers of newborns with any congenital malformation or low birth weight (<2,500 g), with children who were delivered preterm (<37 weeks gestation), or mothers with children admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit were initially not invited to participate to avoid subjecting them to unnecessary stress. Also, women not speaking Italian were excluded from the study. The distribution of the 2,212 participants at the seven participating maternity clinics was as follows: Verbania (14.5 %), Genova (17.8 %), Fidenza (9.9 %), Pisa (9.1 %), Roma Fatebenefratelli (23.1 %), Roma Santo Spirito (10.8 %), and Benevento (14.7 %) [25]. Of the 2,212 participating women, we excluded 23 women who did not have information of folic acid supplement use (n = 5) or did not provide information on the time period of use (n = 18), leaving back 2,189 women for analyzes.

Folic acid supplement use

The women were asked to report data on supplemental use of folic acid and other vitamins by specifying the brand name, the frequency of use, as well as the time period of use. In this study, we defined folic acid supplement use as any use of supplements containing folic acid for at least once a week during the following predefined time periods: (a) at least one month before the last menstrual period to the end of the first trimester, (b) at least six months before the last menstrual period to the end of the first trimester, (c) soon after pregnancy confirmation to the end of the first trimester, (d) after the first trimester of pregnancy, or (e) no use at all. The main outcome variable under study was preconception folic acid supplement use, i.e., any use of folic acid supplements that had started before the last menstrual period (category (a) and (b) above). Note that our definition of preconception folic acid use differs somewhat from the official recommendations by allowing for a more moderate use as well, i.e., less than seven days a week.

Potential determinants

Based on the questionnaire, we abstracted data on the following relevant determinants of folic acid supplement use: maternal age at study recruitment (Verbania) or delivery (other regions), parity, maternal education, marital status, national citizenship, working activity, pregnancy intention, preconception health visit, infertility treatment, maternal smoking, prepregnancy body mass index (kg/m2), and chronic diseases. The pregnancy was classified as intended, mistimed or unintended on the basis of a score of the intensity of pregnancy planning effort developed by Morin et al. [26] The following categories were used: intended (score 9–12), mistimed (score 4–8) and unintended (score: 0–3). The preconception health visit was defined as any visit to a doctor/gynecologist within the last year before the onset of pregnancy to ask for any advice on the possible near future pregnancy, such as medical examinations to perform, medications and vitamins to take. Body mass index before pregnancy was categorized into four groups according to the criteria by the World Health Organization: underweight (<18.50 kg/m2), normal weight (18.50–24.99 kg/m2), pre-obese (25.00–29.99 kg/m2), obese (≥30.00 kg/m2). Parity was defined as the number of previous live births and stillbirths while maternal smoking was defined as any smoking around the time of the last menstrual period. Chronic diseases included diabetes, epilepsy, asthma, and hypertension.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyzes were performed by using SAS (Statistical Analysis System) version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) for Windows. Data were described as percentages or means with interquartile ranges (IQRs). The chi-square test was used to test for group difference in categorical variables. All P values were two-sided and values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Associations of preconception folic acid use with the various maternal characteristics were estimated by prevalence ratios with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using log-binomial regression models with the log-link function. All prevalence ratios were estimated by crude models, as well as after adjustment for maternal age, parity, maternal education, marital status, national citizenship (here: Italian), pregnancy intention, preconception health visit, infertility treatment, and maternal smoking before pregnancy. All covariates have previously been strongly related to maternal folic acid supplement use. Additionally, the correlation between binary outcomes within the same maternity clinic was taken into account by using generalized estimating equations methodology, assuming an exchangeable working correlation structure. Women with missing data on covariates were excluded in multiple regression analyzes.

Results

Of the 2,189 participating women, the mean maternal age was 33 (IQR: 29–37; range 13–50) years; only 6 % were younger than 25 years while 40 % were older than 35 years (Table 1). We further estimated that 64 % of the women had intended their pregnancy and that 30 % had mistimed their pregnancy. Overall, 41 % of the women reported that they had requested a preconception health visit to a doctor/gynecologist whereas 7 % had reported that they had used an infertility treatment. Reported smoking prevalence before the onset of pregnancy was as high as 26 %.
Table 1

Characteristics of the study sample

CharacteristicNo. of womena
n %
Maternal age (years)
<251305.9
25–2940418.5
30–3472433.1
35–3966030.2
40 or more2099.5
Parity
01,24656.9
173033.3
21717.8
3 or more421.9
Educational level
Primary school33115.1
Secondary school96043.9
University89040.7
Marital status
No partner2139.7
Married/cohabiting1,95789.4
Citizenship
Non-Italian31914.6
Italian1,86785.3
Working activity
Studying1064.8
Working1,68376.9
Working at home28312.9
Not working944.3
Pregnancy intention
Unintended1215.5
Mistimed64629.5
Intended1,39263.6
Preconception health visit
No1,26657.8
Yes90741.4
Infertility treatment
No2,00191.4
Ovulation inductor use, no ART311.4
ART1285.8
Maternal smoking before pregnancy
No1,61473.7
Yes57526.3
BMI before pregnancy
Underweight1808.2
Normal weight1,57371.9
Pre-obese30313.8
Obese1225.6
Chronic disease
No1,95989.5
Yes2089.5

Abbreviation: ART assisted reproductive technology, BMI body mass index

aPercentages do not add to 2,189 and 100 % due to missing data: 62 women on maternal age, 8 women on educational level, 19 women on marital status, 3 women on citizenship, 23 women on working activity, 30 women on pregnancy intention, 16 women on preconception health visit, 29 women on infertility treatment, 11 women on body mass index before pregnancy, and 22 women with chronic disease

Characteristics of the study sample Abbreviation: ART assisted reproductive technology, BMI body mass index aPercentages do not add to 2,189 and 100 % due to missing data: 62 women on maternal age, 8 women on educational level, 19 women on marital status, 3 women on citizenship, 23 women on working activity, 30 women on pregnancy intention, 16 women on preconception health visit, 29 women on infertility treatment, 11 women on body mass index before pregnancy, and 22 women with chronic disease Overall, 84 % (n = 1,838) of the participating women had taken folic acid supplements at some time point before and/or during pregnancy while only 23.5 % (n = 515) of the participants had reported the use of folic acid supplements before the onset of pregnancy. Specifically, 11.7 % (n = 256) of all women had initiated use, at least, one month before pregnancy, 11.8 % (n = 259) had initiated use, at least, six months before pregnancy, 54.9 % (n = 1201) had initiated after pregnancy confirmation during the first trimester, and 5.6 % (n = 122) reported starting folic acid use after the first trimester of pregnancy (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

The prevalence of folic acid supplement users according to time periods of use (n = 2,189). Time periods of use were defined as at least one month before the last menstrual period to the end of the first trimester, at least six months before the last menstrual period to the end of the first trimester, soon after pregnancy confirmation to the end of the first trimester, after the first trimester of pregnancy, or no use at all

The prevalence of folic acid supplement users according to time periods of use (n = 2,189). Time periods of use were defined as at least one month before the last menstrual period to the end of the first trimester, at least six months before the last menstrual period to the end of the first trimester, soon after pregnancy confirmation to the end of the first trimester, after the first trimester of pregnancy, or no use at all For all subgroups of women, intake of folic acid use was low during the preconception period and highest after pregnancy confirmation (Table 2). In particular, the initiation of supplement use in women younger than 25 years of age was only 5.4 % before pregnancy and 63 % soon after pregnancy confirmation.
Table 2

Prevalence of folic acid supplement users according to maternal characteristics and time periods of usea

CharacteristicNo. of womenFolic acid supplement users, %b
At least one month before pregnancy (n = 256)At least six months before pregnancy (n = 259)Soon after pregnancy confirmation (n = 1,201)After the first trimester (n = 122)
Maternal age (years)
<251305.4063.17.7
25–2940411.47.458.74.7
30–3472413.510.954.46.2
35–3966012.315.851.15.2
40 or more20910.519.153.14.8
Parity
01,24612.414.452.84.5
173011.68.658.86.4
21718.28.855.09.4
3 or more424.82.447.67.1
Educational level
Primary school3313.95.453.58.2
Secondary school96011.310.256.36.9
University89015.116.154.23.3
Marital status
No partner2135.66.662.97.5
Married/cohabiting1,95712.312.554.25.4
Citizenship
Non-Italian3198.26.053.010.0
Italian1,86712.312.955.24.8
Working activity
Studying10610.47.561.35.7
Working1,68312.412.755.05.4
Working at home2838.58.853.76.0
Not working9410.613.850.07.4
Pregnancy intention
Unintended1214.12.557.09.1
Mistimed6464.34.062.47.3
Intended1,39215.816.451.14.4
Preconception health visit
No1,2665.15.063.66.8
Yes90721.221.642.93.9
Infertility treatment
No2,00111.09.957.05.5
Ovulation inductor use, no ART316.541.932.312.9
ART12822.735.230.52.3
Maternal smoking before pregnancy
No1,61412.513.153.55.4
Yes5759.48.358.66.1
BMI before pregnancy
Underweight18011.112.253.96.1
Normal weight1,57312.412.354.25.6
Pre-obese30311.29.959.44.3
Obese1225.79.854.96.6
Chronic disease
No1,95911.211.055.45.8
Yes20814.419.750.03.8

Abbreviation: ART assisted reproductive technology, BMI body mass index

aTime periods were defined as (a) at least one month before the last menstrual period to the end of the first trimester, (b) at least six months before the last menstrual period to the end of the first trimester, (c) soon after pregnancy confirmation to the end of the first trimester, (d) after the first trimester of pregnancy, or (e) no use at all

bPercentage of “no use at all” not shown in the table

Prevalence of folic acid supplement users according to maternal characteristics and time periods of usea Abbreviation: ART assisted reproductive technology, BMI body mass index aTime periods were defined as (a) at least one month before the last menstrual period to the end of the first trimester, (b) at least six months before the last menstrual period to the end of the first trimester, (c) soon after pregnancy confirmation to the end of the first trimester, (d) after the first trimester of pregnancy, or (e) no use at all bPercentage of “no use at all” not shown in the table Preconception folic acid use was reported by 23.5 % (n = 515) of the participants. Of these, 479 (93 %) women had taken folic acid supplements on a daily basis as recommended by the health authorities, 25 (4.9 %) women had taken the supplements 4–6 times a week while 6 (1.2 %) women had taken them 1–3 times a week. Five women (0.9%) did not report the frequency of use. Unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses showed that age over 25 years, being pregnant for the first time, having a university degree/secondary school, being married/cohabiting, intending the pregnancy, requesting preconception health visit to a doctor/gynecologist, using infertility treatments, and having chronic diseases were all statistically significant determinants of preconception folic acid use (Table 3). Italian citizenship, ovulation inductor use, and non-smoking before pregnancy were not significant determinants after adjustment for covariates. Working status and body mass index before pregnancy were insignificant determinants both before and after covariate adjustments (Table 3).
Table 3

Prevalence and association of preconception folic acid supplement according to reported maternal characteristics

CharacteristicNo. of womenNo. of supplement usersa Crudeb Adjustedc
Prevalence ratio95 % confidence intervalPrevalence ratio95 % confidence interval
N n %
Maternal age (years)
<25d 13075.40.230.07, 0.800.310.12, 0.80
25–294047618.80.780.60, 1.010.940.79, 1.11
30–3472417724.411
35–3966018528.01.131.03, 1.231.050.96, 1.15
40 or more2096229.71.181.03, 1.360.980.85, 1.14
Parity
0d 1,24633526.911
173014820.30.740.63, 0.860.860.77, 0.95
21712917.00.650.56, 0.760.820.57, 1.18
3 or more4237.10.240.08, 0.720.660.29, 1.51
Educational level
Primary schoold 331319.411
Secondary school96020621.51.991.73, 2.291.691.46, 1.95
University89027731.12.802.41, 3.261.901.62, 2.22
Marital status
No partnerd 2132612.211
Married/cohabiting1,95748524.82.261.86, 2.751.441.21, 1.72
Citizenship
Non-Italiand 3194514.11
Italian1,86747025.22.321.21, 4.421.400.99, 1.97
Working activity
Studyingd 1061917.911
Working1,68342225.11.470.89, 2.421.000.73, 1.36
Working at home2834917.31.150.68, 1.961.100.77, 1.58
Not working942324.51.490.73, 3.061.310.88, 1.97
Pregnancy intention
Unintendedd 12186.611
Mistimed646548.41.340.79, 2.281.020.61, 1.70
Intended1,39244832.24.872.51, 9.432.401.14, 5.05
Preconception health visit
Nod 1,26612710.011
Yes90738842.84.213.09, 5.722.902.21, 3.82
Infertility treatment
Nod 2,00141820.911
Ovulation inductor use, no ART311548.42.111.35, 3.291.000.62, 1.60
ART1287457.82.752.08, 3.641.351.08, 1.68
Maternal smoking before pregnancy
Nod 1,61441325.611
Yes57510217.70.700.59, 0.820.920.79, 1.07
BMI before pregnancy
Underweightd 1804223.311
Normal weight1,57338924.71.110.89, 1.380.970.75, 1.25
Pre-obese3036421.11.010.81, 1.270.970.75, 1.26
Obese1221915.60.770.53, 1.110.840.54, 1.31
Chronic disease
Nod 1,95943622.311
Yes2087134.11.471.17, 1.851.221.09, 1.37

Abbreviation: ART assisted reproductive technology, BMI body mass index

aAny supplement use that started before the last menstrual period

bCrude prevalence ratio was estimated by log-binomial regression models

cAdjusted for maternal age, parity, maternal education, marital status, Italian citizenship, pregnancy intention, preconception health visit, infertility treatment, and maternal smoking before pregnancy

dReference category

Prevalence and association of preconception folic acid supplement according to reported maternal characteristics Abbreviation: ART assisted reproductive technology, BMI body mass index aAny supplement use that started before the last menstrual period bCrude prevalence ratio was estimated by log-binomial regression models cAdjusted for maternal age, parity, maternal education, marital status, Italian citizenship, pregnancy intention, preconception health visit, infertility treatment, and maternal smoking before pregnancy dReference category Of the 515 women who had initiated use of folic acid-containing supplements before the onset of pregnancy, we had exact folic acid dose information on 506 women (98.2 %). Of these, 71.5 % had taken the usual dose of 0.4 mg, 20.9 % had taken 0.4 mg to 5.0 mg while 7.5 % had taken more than 5.0 mg (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

The distribution of reported folic acid dose (mg) among preconception supplement users (n = 515). Preconception folic acid supplement use was defined as any use of folic acid supplements that had started before the last menstrual period

The distribution of reported folic acid dose (mg) among preconception supplement users (n = 515). Preconception folic acid supplement use was defined as any use of folic acid supplements that had started before the last menstrual period One-third of the women (n = 712) reported that they had both intended their pregnancy and had requested a preconception health visit to a doctor/gynecologist (Table 4). These women were eight times more likely to start folic acid supplementation before pregnancy compared with those who did not intend and did not request a preconception health visit (48.6 versus 4.8 %; adjusted prevalence ratio = 7.90 [95 % CI: 4.62, 13.5]).
Table 4

Prevalence and association of preconception folic acid supplement use according to status of preconception health visit to a doctor/gynecologist and status of pregnancy intention

Preconception health visitPregnancy intentiona No. of womenb No. of supplement usersc Cruded Adjustede
Prevalence ratio95 % confidence intervalPrevalence ratio95 % confidence interval
n n %
Nof Nof 584284.81.001.00
NoYes6599714.72.981.93, 4.612.871.72, 4.79
YesNo1883920.74.352.33, 8.124.082.29, 7.28
YesYes71234648.69.695.68, 16.57.904.62, 13.5

aStatus of pregnancy intention was defined as intended (yes) and unintended/mistimed (no)

bData were missing for 30 women on pregnancy intention and 16 women on preconception health visit

cAny supplement use that started before the last menstrual period

dCrude prevalence ratio was estimated by log-binomial regression models

eAdjusted for maternal age, parity, maternal education, marital status, Italian citizenship, infertility treatment, and maternal smoking before pregnancy

fReference category

Prevalence and association of preconception folic acid supplement use according to status of preconception health visit to a doctor/gynecologist and status of pregnancy intention aStatus of pregnancy intention was defined as intended (yes) and unintended/mistimed (no) bData were missing for 30 women on pregnancy intention and 16 women on preconception health visit cAny supplement use that started before the last menstrual period dCrude prevalence ratio was estimated by log-binomial regression models eAdjusted for maternal age, parity, maternal education, marital status, Italian citizenship, infertility treatment, and maternal smoking before pregnancy fReference category Of 188 pregnancies that were not planned but in which the mother had consulted a doctor/gynecologists on preconception health advice (Table 4), 92 % (173/188) were classified as mistimed. The prevalence of folic acid supplement use in these 173 mistimed pregnancies was 21.4 % (not shown). Finally, the estimated prevalence of preconception folic acid supplement use in the specific group of resourceful women (those who aged over 25 years, had a university degree, were married/cohabiting, had Italian citizenship, intended their pregnancy, requested a preconception visit) was 58.0 % [95 % CI: 52 %, 64 %], which was twice as high as the preconception prevalence of 23.5 % estimated for the total population.

Discussion

Our study showed that 84 % of women had taken folic acid supplements at some time point before and/or during the pregnancy but that only 23.5 % of the participants had initiated use before the onset of pregnancy. In general, the percentage of initiation of folic acid supplement use was low before the onset of pregnancy and highest soon after pregnancy confirmation. This pattern was seen in all subgroups of women and suggests that the majority of women acquire folic acid information firstly after the onset of pregnancy. The most important determinants of folic acid use before the onset of pregnancy were preconception health visit to a doctor and pregnancy intention. This is among the largest studies to examine the prevalence and determinants of maternal preconception folic acid supplement use in Italy. Strengths of the study include the detailed data on frequency, dose, and timing of folic acid supplement use, the analysis of a large number of maternal characteristics as determinants of supplement use, and the multicenter design in which data were collected through seven maternity clinics from six regions in Italy (three in the north, three in the center, and one in the south). However, our study sample may not be representative of all women giving birth in Italy. Women who did not comprehend the Italian language, those who delivered before 37 weeks of gestation or had an infant with birth weight below 2,500 g were not invited to participate. In addition, mothers with the lowest educational level may have been underrepresented in our study [27]. As these factors have been related to low use, our study might have overestimated the prevalence of preconception folic acid supplement use. Our prevalence estimate is still close to that reported in a previous study, which was 25.4 % in Italians [23]. Our findings on determinants of preconception folic acid use are generally consistent with those found in numerous other studies. Higher maternal age, having higher education, being married/cohabiting, having lower parity, using infertility treatments, and having a chronic disease have all been identified as statistically significant determinants of preconception folic acid use in previous studies [15-19]. In contrast to some findings, we did not identify national citizenship [17] and maternal smoking before pregnancy [15, 16] as significant independent factors after adjusting for covariates. Also, the association of ovulation inductor use was substantially attenuated after covariate adjustments, particularly after adjustment of preconception health visit and pregnancy intention (not shown). Consistent with two other large studies [15, 16], prepregnancy body mass index was not important determinants of preconception folic acid use in our study, neither was working status. We identified preconception health visit to a doctor/gynecologist and pregnancy intention as the most important determinants of preconception folic acid supplement use. Obviously, women who intend their pregnancy or seek preconception advice from their doctor before pregnancy may be more informed on the benefits and timing of folic acid. Still, only 48.6 % (346/712) of all those who had requested preconception health visit and also had intended their pregnancy were using folic acid before pregnancy (see Table 4). An explanation for the low proportion of preconception folic acid users in this highly motivated group may be that recommendations on folic acid supplement use were not sufficiently provided to women by their doctors or that, in spite of sufficient information, women forgot or choose not to follow the doctor’s advice. These and other specific reasons for not taking folic acid supplements despite pregnancy planning and preconception health visits should be further investigated in studies to gain new insight on how to improve supplement use in these women [14]. As many as 27 % (584/2,189) women did not intend their pregnancy and did not request a preconception health visit (see Table 4). Of these, only 5 % (28/584) used folic acid-containing supplements before the onset of pregnancy. Clearly, information on the benefits of folic acid had not reached out to this large group of women, questioning the efficiency of the official recommendations to fertile women. To improve folate status in fertile women and particularly in women with unintended pregnancies, many countries, including the United States and Canada, have decided to fortify their foods with folic acid. In these countries, a risk reduction of neural tube defects has been reported [4-7]. Many countries refrain mandatory folic acid fortification, partly because of the risk of masking anemia related to a B12 deficiency in the elderly and partly because of unknown cancer risks in the non-pregnant population [9]. Recent results, however, show that folic acid in fortified foods and supplements does not interfere with vitamin B12 metabolism at the cellular level in a healthy population [28]. Additionally, a recent meta-analysis showed no significant risk (reduced or increased) of overall or site-specific cancers in nearly 50,000 individuals from 13 different randomized clinical trials of folic acid supplement use [29]. Given that Italy does not fortify food with folic acid and as many as 36 % mothers do not plan their pregnancy [25], new effective strategies for increasing supplement use in these pregnancies are strongly needed. Of 188 pregnancies that were not planned but in which the mother had consulted a doctor/gynecologists on preconception health advice (see Table 4), 92 % (173/188) were classified as mistimed. This suggests that many women seeking preconception health advice had not necessarily decided to become pregnant at the time of the visit, but were open to the possibility of becoming pregnant in the near future. The prevalence of folic acid supplement use in these women was only 21.4 % and might be substantially improved by more direct measures by their doctors. Folates occur naturally in foods, predominantly in green leafy vegetables, fruits, and cereal products. Although the typical Mediterranean diet constitutes a large portion of vegetables and fruits rich in folate it is uncertain whether this contributes to improved blood folate levels in Italian fertile women. In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort, women in South Europe, including Italy, appeared to have higher plasma folate concentrations than those in the northern, but not in the more central regions of Europe [30]. Furthermore, in a recent Italian study excluding vitamin B supplement users [31], only a small portion of women in childbearing age reached adequate levels of serum folate and red blood cell folate according to estimated thresholds for neural tube defect prevention [31, 32]. In light of this, supplementation with folic acid appears to be an important aspect also in countries with Mediterranean diets.

Conclusions

In conclusion, like many women in other countries, many Italian women start folic acid supplement use too late with respect to neural tube defect prevention. Particularly, women who do not plan their pregnancy and do not request a preconception health visit to the doctor before the pregnancy have among the lowest prevalence of preconception folic acid use. Increased folic acid promotion during preconception health visits combined with an even higher rate of both planned pregnancies and preconception health visits might help improve supplement use in Italian women. Alternatively, mandatory food fortification with folic acid might be an option for improving folate status, but more information on the overall intake of folate from foods and supplements in Italy is needed before considering such interventions.

Abbreviations

ART, assisted reproductive technologyl; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range
  28 in total

Review 1.  Folic acid: a public-health challenge.

Authors:  Monika Eichholzer; Otmar Tönz; Roland Zimmermann
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Folic acid: a public-health challenge.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Antonio Addis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Folic acid supplementation and interpregnancy interval.

Authors:  Roy Miodini Nilsen; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Nina Gunnes; Elin R Alsaker; Anne Lise Bjørke-Monsen; Simone J P M Eussen; Margaretha Haugen; Ane Johannessen; Helle Margrete Meltzer; Camilla Stoltenberg; Per Magne Ueland; Stein Emil Vollset
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Folate, vitamin B12 and homocysteine status in an Italian blood donor population.

Authors:  B Zappacosta; S Persichilli; L Iacoviello; A Di Castelnuovo; M Graziano; J Gervasoni; E Leoncini; G Cimino; P Mastroiacovo
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.222

5.  North-south gradients in plasma concentrations of B-vitamins and other components of one-carbon metabolism in Western Europe: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study.

Authors:  Simone J P M Eussen; Roy M Nilsen; Øivind Midttun; Steinar Hustad; Noortje IJssennagger; Klaus Meyer; Åse Fredriksen; Arve Ulvik; Per M Ueland; Paul Brennan; Mattias Johansson; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Paolo Vineis; Shu-Chun Chuang; Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault; Laure Dossus; Florence Perquier; Kim Overvad; Birgit Teucher; Verena A Grote; Antonia Trichopoulou; George Adarakis; Maria Plada; Sabina Sieri; Rosario Tumino; Maria Santucci de Magistris; Martine M Ros; Petra H M Peeters; Maria Luisa Redondo; Raul Zamora-Ros; Maria-Dolores Chirlaque; Eva Ardanaz; Emily Sonestedt; Ulrika Ericson; Jörn Schneede; Bethany van Guelpen; Petra A Wark; Valentina Gallo; Teresa Norat; Elio Riboli; Stein Emil Vollset
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 6.  Recommendations for the use of folic acid to reduce the number of cases of spina bifida and other neural tube defects.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  1992-09-11

7.  Poor Folate Intake in a North Italian Pregnant Population: an Epidemiological Survey.

Authors:  Giulia Dante; Letizia Morani; Daisy Bronzetti; Paola Garutti; Isabella Neri; Gioacchino Calapai; Fabio Facchinetti
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.980

8.  Reduction in neural-tube defects after folic acid fortification in Canada.

Authors:  Philippe De Wals; Fassiatou Tairou; Margot I Van Allen; Soo-Hong Uh; R Brian Lowry; Barbara Sibbald; Jane A Evans; Michiel C Van den Hof; Pamela Zimmer; Marian Crowley; Bridget Fernandez; Nora S Lee; Theophile Niyonsenga
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Maternal and health care determinants of preconceptional use of folic acid supplementation in France: results from the 2010 National Perinatal Survey.

Authors:  J Tort; N Lelong; C Prunet; B Khoshnood; B Blondel
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Population red blood cell folate concentrations for prevention of neural tube defects: Bayesian model.

Authors:  Krista S Crider; Owen Devine; Ling Hao; Nicole F Dowling; Song Li; Anne M Molloy; Zhu Li; Jianghui Zhu; Robert J Berry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-07-29
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Consequences and Possible Predictors of Health-damaging Behaviors and Mental Health Problems in Pregnancy - A Review.

Authors:  F Ulrich; F Petermann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Supplemental Folate and the Relationship Between Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Livebirth Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction.

Authors:  Audrey J Gaskins; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Kelvin C Fong; Yara Abu Awad; Qian Di; Jorge E Chavarro; Jennifer B Ford; Brent A Coull; Joel Schwartz; Itai Kloog; Jill Attaman; Russ Hauser; Francine Laden
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Association between Duration of Folic Acid Supplementation during Pregnancy and Risk of Postpartum Depression.

Authors:  Jing Yan; Yuyan Liu; Lujia Cao; Yuzhi Zheng; Wen Li; Guowei Huang
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  The PREgnancy and FERtility (PREFER) study: an Italian multicenter prospective cohort study on fertility preservation and pregnancy issues in young breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Matteo Lambertini; Paola Anserini; Valeria Fontana; Francesca Poggio; Giuseppina Iacono; Annalisa Abate; Alessia Levaggi; Loredana Miglietta; Claudia Bighin; Sara Giraudi; Alessia D'Alonzo; Eva Blondeaux; Davide Buffi; Francesco Campone; Domenico F Merlo; Lucia Del Mastro
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Ethnic differences in folic acid supplement use in a population-based cohort of pregnant women in Norway.

Authors:  Tarja I Kinnunen; Line Sletner; Christine Sommer; Martine C Post; Anne Karen Jenum
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Paternal characteristics associated with maternal periconceptional use of folic acid supplementation.

Authors:  Jan Helge Seglem Mortensen; Nina Øyen; Roy M Nilsen; Tatiana Fomina; Steinar Tretli; Tone Bjørge
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Preconception Folic Acid Supplement Use in Immigrant Women (1999-2016).

Authors:  Roy M Nilsen; Anne K Daltveit; Marjolein M Iversen; Marit G Sandberg; Erica Schytt; Rhonda Small; Ragnhild B Strandberg; Eline S Vik; Vigdis Aasheim
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Epidemiology and (Patho)Physiology of Folic Acid Supplement Use in Obese Women before and during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa van der Windt; Sam Schoenmakers; Bas van Rijn; Sander Galjaard; Régine Steegers-Theunissen; Lenie van Rossem
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Socioeconomic inequality in periconceptional folic acid supplementation in China: a census of 0.9 million women in their first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Min Liu; Jing Chen; Jue Liu; Shikun Zhang; Qiaomei Wang; Haiping Shen; Yiping Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Effectiveness of Folic Acid Supplementation Recommendations among Polish Female Students from the Podkarpackie Region.

Authors:  Maria Zadarko-Domaradzka; Ewa Kruszyńska; Emilian Zadarko
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.