Literature DB >> 27409250

Influence of Stream Bottom Substrate on Retention and Transport of Vertebrate Environmental DNA.

Christopher L Jerde1,2, Brett P Olds1,3, Arial J Shogren1, Elizabeth A Andruszkiewicz4,5, Andrew R Mahon6, Diogo Bolster4, Jennifer L Tank1.   

Abstract

While environmental DNA (eDNA) is now being regularly used to detect rare and elusive species, detection in lotic environments comes with a caveat: The species being detected is likely some distance upstream from the point of sampling. Here, we conduct a series of seminatural stream experiments to test the sensitivity of new digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) to detect low concentrations of eDNA in a lotic system, measure the residence time of eDNA compared to a conservative tracer, and we model the transport of eDNA in this system. We found that while ddPCR improves our sensitivity of detection, the residence time and transport of eDNA does not follow the same dynamics as the conservative tracer and necessitates a more stochastic framework for modeling eDNA transport. There was no evidence for differences in the transport of eDNA due to substrate type. The relatively large amount of unexplained variability in eDNA transport reveals the need for uncovering mechanisms and processes by which eDNA is transported downstream leading to species detections, particularly when inferences are to be made in natural systems where eDNA is being used for conservation management.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27409250     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  23 in total

Review 1.  Early detection monitoring for aquatic non-indigenous species: Optimizing surveillance, incorporating advanced technologies, and identifying research needs.

Authors:  Anett S Trebitz; Joel C Hoffman; John A Darling; Erik M Pilgrim; John R Kelly; Emily A Brown; W Lindsay Chadderton; Scott P Egan; Erin K Grey; Syed A Hashsham; Katy E Klymus; Andrew R Mahon; Jeffrey L Ram; Martin T Schultz; Carol A Stepien; James C Schardt
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 2.  Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity.

Authors:  Jori B Harrison; Jennifer M Sunday; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples Correlate with Trawl Catches of Subarctic, Deepwater Fishes.

Authors:  Philip Francis Thomsen; Peter Rask Møller; Eva Egelyng Sigsgaard; Steen Wilhelm Knudsen; Ole Ankjær Jørgensen; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A systematic approach to evaluate the influence of environmental conditions on eDNA detection success in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Bernhard C Stoeckle; Sebastian Beggel; Alexander F Cerwenka; Elena Motivans; Ralph Kuehn; Juergen Geist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The effect of tides on nearshore environmental DNA.

Authors:  Ryan P Kelly; Ramón Gallego; Emily Jacobs-Palmer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Controls on eDNA movement in streams: Transport, Retention, and Resuspension.

Authors:  Arial J Shogren; Jennifer L Tank; Elizabeth Andruszkiewicz; Brett Olds; Andrew R Mahon; Christopher L Jerde; Diogo Bolster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Environmental DNA method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.

Authors:  Izumi Katano; Ken Harada; Hideyuki Doi; Rio Souma; Toshifumi Minamoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Environmental DNA in subterranean biology: range extension and taxonomic implications for Proteus.

Authors:  Špela Gorički; David Stanković; Aleš Snoj; Matjaž Kuntner; William R Jeffery; Peter Trontelj; Miloš Pavićević; Zlatko Grizelj; Magdalena Năpăruş-Aljančič; Gregor Aljančič
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Detection and quantification of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato mosquito larvae in experimental aquatic habitats using environmental DNA (eDNA).

Authors:  Joel Odero; Bruno Gomes; Ulrike Fillinger; David Weetman
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2018-03-08

10.  Fecal source tracking and eDNA profiling in an urban creek following an extreme rain event.

Authors:  Zachery R Staley; Jun Dennis Chuong; Stephen J Hill; Josey Grabuski; Shadi Shokralla; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Thomas A Edge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.