Eduardo Campos Pellanda1, Lucia Campos Pellanda2. 1. Pontifícia Universidade Católica-Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 2. Instituto de Cardiologia, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Epidemiology has shown the growing importance of prevention as a way of dealing with the
cardiovascular risk epidemic. One of the fundamental changes in concepts in recent
decades was the shift in the prevention paradigm to ever earlier stages, both in the
disease development, affecting an increasing number of individuals that have yet to
develop a pathological condition or those who are in the early and treatable stages, as
of the life line itself, looking for the origin of chronic diseases in intrauterine
life.[1] Thus, the concept of
primordial prevention arose, that is, the prevention of the actual risk factors.Ideally, preventing the establishment of risk factors in a population would keep it
disease-free. Although utopian, the scenario described is useful to guide prevention
strategies. One of the main current objectives is to reach the greatest possible number
of individuals before they develop a risk profile.In this sense, the revolution of wearables, or wearable devices, has great potential to
contribute to primary prevention, by participating in the daily lives of individuals
with an all-inclusiveness that is impossible for isolated interventions based solely on
health services to achieve.To understand the wearables, one must recall how the computer ceased to be something
detached to become something that is always close to our bodies. The computational
device formats have evolved since the late 1970s, with the introduction of the concept
of personal machines, or personal computers - the PCs. The term "personal" refers to a
computing device attached to the daily lives of individuals, not corporate life. If they
conquered the homes in the 1980s, in the middle of the 1990s, there were devices of
several sizes and formats powered by batteries that allowed user mobility that was
unheard of. While wireless networks (data or voice) expanded their reach, the telephone
started to be carried along by people and even steal the attention that was previously
given to the radio and watch.This infrastructure allowed a radical change to occur in the interface of the common user
and computing, also resulting in the birth of a mobile application ecosystem in this new
form of Internet access - the main one, for many individuals. This mobile connection
status is "always-on" and hyperpersonal,[2] in addition to allowing new forms of communication in the metropolis
environment. The logical evolution would be the intense use of mobile communication, as
well as the miniaturization of components and devices, which are used attached to the
body and not in pockets anymore.[3,4]Thus, wearables can be not only always close to the individual, but also collect, through
sensors, the body's own information, such as counting steps or measuring heart rate.
Because of the very small screens, or without displays, they are at the same time, the
smartphone extensions and information entry points through voice.[5]At this initial phase, they take familiar forms, such as glasses (Google Glass) or
watches (Apple Watch and Pebble, among others). In both cases, there is an adaptation of
the original shapes of glasses and watches to process information. Watches would
potentially have lower resistance, as they always provided some kind of extra
information in addition to the hour. As for glasses, they were always perceived as
intended for the amplification and correction of optical realities, which makes their
transformation less acceptable socially at this historical moment.At the moment, what seems clear is that people have different points of information in
their bodies, thus making the perception of connection more natural and "invisible".The worldwide sales of wearables should reach the figure of 200 million units by
2019.[6] Considering today's
scenario, we must think of wearables not only as a wearable accessory, but as an
information accessory that can help the public or by capturing or reporting data. These
two possibilities and their combinations allow more than just uploading data at times
when people are not in front of the screens, in addition to the new useful
characteristic that information on the wrist, for instance, can carry.Simple data capture devices, such as straps with motion and heart rate sensors, can
generate a huge volume of information, which allows not only individual patient
monitoring, but also the planning of collective prevention strategies. This type of Big
Data can be useful, for instance, to evaluate ecological interventions, such as changing
the urban layout, to promote physical activity in a city's population.[7]Additionally, the monitoring itself can help change behaviors, as it furthers
individuals' knowledge about themselves and encourages them to take the leading role
when caring for their own health.[8]This is another example of the need for new paradigms in research on prevention. To be
able to follow the evolution of concepts in prevention and the change in lifestyles at a
time of mobile information, research also needs to be innovative, transdisciplinary and
agile. The Brazilian Archives of Cardiology, in its role of stimulating innovative
research in cardiology, proposes to carry out intervention studies in our country, so
that technological innovations can in fact contribute to the improvement of health
outcomes.