| Literature DB >> 27408857 |
Ajit S Shinto1, K Kamaleshwaran1, K Vyshak1, Natarajan Sudhakar1, Sharmila Banerjee2, Aruna Korde2, Grace Samuel2, Madhav Mallia2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance and utility of (99m)Tc HYNIC-TOC planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT in the diagnosis, staging and management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GPNETs).Entities:
Keywords: HYNIC TOC; Neuroendocrine tumor; SPECT CT
Year: 2014 PMID: 27408857 PMCID: PMC4937710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol ISSN: 2322-5718
Patient and disease characteristics
| Variable | Value | Patients % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 48 | Not applicable | |
| Range | 36 to 67 | ||
| Male | 14 | 63.6 | |
| Female | 8 | 36.4 | |
| Median | 468 | Not applicable | |
| Range | 118-5400 | ||
| Carcinoid | 11 | 50 | |
| Pancreatic NET | 6 | 27.3 | |
| Gastrinoma | 1 | 4.55 | |
| Neuroendocrine tumor NOS | 4 | 18.1 | |
| Surgery | 2 | 9.1 | |
| Octreotide | 6 | 27.3 | |
| Surgery and octreotide | 4 | 18.1 | |
| Surgery and chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both | 2 | 9.1 | |
| Octreotide and chemotherapy | 3 | 13.6 | |
| None | 5 | 22.7 | |
| Staging | 8 | 36.3 | |
| Restaging | 14 | 63.7 |
Figure 1a) Whole body anterior and posterior Tc-99m-HYNIC-TOC images showing primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour. b) SPECT, CT and fused SPECT/CT slices localized uptake to the pancreatic tumour
Primary and metastatic sites obtained with Tc-99m HYNIC-TOC imaging
| Finding | Conventional Imaging | Tc-99m HYNIC-TOC imaging | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 14 | ||
| 9 | 2 | ||
| Stomach | 0 | 1 | |
| Duodenum | 2 | 3 | |
| Rectum or colon | 1 | 1 | |
| Pancreas | 2 | 5 | |
| Jejunum | 1 | 2 | |
| Ileum | 1 | 1 | |
| Others | 0 | 1 | |
| 18 | 22 | ||
| Liver | 14 | 20 | |
| Lymph node | 4 | 6 | |
| Bone | 1 | 2 | |
| Others | 2 | 5 | |
Patient-Based Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional Imaging and scintigraphy for the Detection of Primary Tumor
| Performance | Conventional Imaging % | Scintigraphy Imaging % |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 43.75 | 87.5 |
| Specificity | 100 | 85.7 |
| Positive Predictive value | 100 | 93.3 |
| Negative Predictive value | 37.5 | 75 |
| Accuracy | 59.1 | 86.9 |
Figure 2Transaxial SPECT, CT and fused SPECT/CT as well as coronal image shows uptake in the duodenum and liver lesions.
Patient-Based Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional Imaging and SPECT/CT for the Detection of metastases
| Performance | Conventional Imaging % | SPECT-CT Imaging % |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 81.8 | 100 |
| Specificity | 60 | 85.7 |
| Positive Predictive value | 81.8 | 95.6 |
| Negative Predictive value | 60 | 100 |
| Accuracy | 75 | 96.5 |
Figure 3(a) Whole body anterior and posterior Tc-99m-HYNIC-TOC images showing multiple liver metastasis. (b) SPECT, CT and SPECT/CT localized uptake to the liver lesions.
Figure 4(a)Whole body Tc-99m-HYNIC-TOC images showing two focal uptake, one in the right thigh and other just below bladder. Also photopenic area noted in the liver lesion suggestive of necrosis.(b) Transaxial SPECT, CT and SPECT/CT showing uptake in the neck of right femur and left pubis.