Literature DB >> 27408833

An LC-MS/MS method for the determination of budesonide and 16α-hydroxyprednisolone in dog plasma.

Teresa Gazzotti1, Andrea Barbarossa1, Elisa Zironi1, Paola Roncada1, Marco Pietra1, Giampiero Pagliuca1.   

Abstract

Although budesonide is frequently used in veterinary medicine for the treatment of canine respiratory and bowel inflammatory diseases, knowledge is lacking regarding its kinetics in this species. We developed and validated a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of budesonide and its metabolite 16α-hydroxyprednisolone in dog plasma. The analytes were extracted by solid phase extraction and analysis was performed by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, with positive electrospray ionization.•This method allows budesonide and one of its main metabolites to be simultaneously quantified in dog plasma at fairly low concentrations.•The proposed protocol is very easy and fast to execute, without compromising analytical performances.•A small amount (0.5 mL) of plasma is required, making this approach suitable for pharmacokinetic studies also in small sized dogs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16α-Hydroxyprednisolone; Budesonide; Dog; LC–MS/MS; Plasma

Year:  2016        PMID: 27408833      PMCID: PMC4929248          DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2016.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MethodsX        ISSN: 2215-0161


Method details

An LC–MS/MS method for the quantitative determination of budesonide (BUD) and one of its main metabolite, 16α-hydroxyprednisolone (16α-HP), in dog plasma was developed and validated. The simultaneous quantification of the two molecules, the rapidity and simplicity of the procedure, and the low volume of sample required make the proposed technique suitable for pharmacokinetic studies involving also small-sized dogs. In addition, the developed protocol was employed in a clinical trial on dogs of different breeds, orally treated with BUD once a day for 30 days, demonstrating to be suitable for the purpose [1].

Materials

BUD and betamethasone (BET) standards were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Milan, Italy); 16α-HP was purchased from Du-Hope International Group (Nanjing, China). The internal standard solution was prepared diluting BET in water:acetonitrile (1:1) at a concentration of 50 ng/mL.

Sample preparation

Add 20 μL of BET internal standard solution to 0.5 mL of plasma. Activate the Strata-X cartridge (1 mL, 30 mg) (Phenomenex, Torrance, USA) with 1 mL of methanol and wash with 1 mL of water. Load the sample on the cartridge, at a flow speed of 2 mL/min. Wash the cartridge with 3 mL of a solution of 5% methanol in water. Dry the cartridge under low vacuum conditions for 30 s. Elute the analytes with 1.5 mL of methanol at a flow speed of 2 mL/min, and completely remove the remaining solvent through vacuum. Evaporate the eluate to dryness under nitrogen stream and heating at 35 °C. Dissolve the sample in 100 μL of a mixture of water: acetonitrile (1:1) containing 1% formic acid and vortex for 30 s. Transfer the reconstituted extract to autosampler vial for LC–MS/MS analysis.

LC–MS/MS conditions

The liquid chromatograph was an Alliance 2695 system consisting of a quaternary pump, solvent degasser, auto sampler and column heater (Waters Corporation, Milford, USA). Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Waters XBridge MS C18 column (3.5 μm, 2.1 mm × 150 mm) in combination with a protecting guard column (3.5 μm, 2.1 mm × 5 mm) of the same type (Waters Corporation, Milford, USA). The mobile phase was water containing 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (B). The following gradient program, time (% A − % B), was applied: 0 min (90–10), 5 min (10–90), 8.5 min (10–90), 9.5 min (90–10), 13.0 min (90–10). The flow rate was 0.3 mL/min and the column temperature was maintained at 35 °C. An example of the obtained chromatograms is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Chromatograms of a blank dog plasma sample fortified with budesonide (1.0 ng/mL), 16α-hydroxyprednisolone (1.0 ng/mL) and IS betamethasone (2.0 ng/mL).

Detection was carried out using a Quattro Premier XE triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an ESCI Multi-Mode Ionization Source (Waters Corporation, Milford, USA). The mass spectrometer operated in positive electrospray ionization mode (ESI+) with the following conditions: capillary voltage 3.25 kV; source and desolvation temperature 145 °C and 500 °C, respectively; desolvation and cone gas (nitrogen) flow 1000 L/h and 100 L/h, respectively. Acquisition was performed in SRM (Selected Reaction Monitoring) mode, monitoring two specific transitions for each compound, with a dwell time of 100 ms. The analyte-dependent MS/MS parameters were optimized via direct infusion of tuning standard solution into the mass spectrometer. The selected values of cone voltage, collision energy and the two main transitions monitored for each compound are given in Table 1. Data analysis was performed using MassLynx 4.1 Software (Waters Corporation, Milford, USA).
Table 1

Retention times and mass spectrometric details of budesonide, 16α-hydroxyprednisolone and betamethasone (internal standard).

AnalyteRetention time (min)Cone voltage (V)Collision energy (eV)Quantification transition (m/z)Confirmation transition (m/z)
BUD8.351511431 > 413431 > 323
16α-HP6.411410377 > 359377 > 323
BET7.42168393 > 373393 > 147

Method validation

The proposed LC–MS/MS method was validated according to current European guidelines [2], taking into account specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision and limit of quantification (LOQ). The specificity was evaluated checking the ion chromatograms of blank samples collected from 21 dogs and analyzed for potential interfering compounds co-eluting at the specific retention times of the analytes. The linearity of the method was assessed with five-points matrix-matched calibration curves, obtained by spiking pooled blank samples of plasma with standard solutions of BUD and 16α-HP at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 ng/mL, and freshly prepared during different days. Peak area ratios between each analyte and BET (internal standard) were plotted against their concentration ratios, and a linear regression least square regression model was applied, showing a good linearity (R2 > 0.99). The precision and accuracy of the assay were tested by analyzing blank samples fortified at three concentrations (0.5, 1 and 5 ng/mL) for both analytes. In particular, 18 spiked samples for each level were processed on three different days (six samples per day). The precision was measured as relative standard deviation to the mean (CV%) of both repeatability (within-day) and reproducibility (between-days). The results of the accuracy and precision experiments (Table 2) confirmed the good performances of the method.
Table 2

Results of method validation.

AnalyteParameterFortification level
0.5 ng/mL1 ng/mL5 ng/mL
Repeatability (CV%)8.19.113.0
BUDReproducibility (CV%)14.112.813.7
Accuracy (bias%)2.4−2.6−3.0



Repeatability (CV%)9.41.69.2
16α-HPReproducibility (CV%)18.912.311.3
Accuracy (bias%)0.09.2−5.3
The limit of quantification (LOQ) of the method, defined as the measured concentration with a signal to noise (S/N) ratio greater than 10, and acceptable precision and accuracy, was 0.25 ng/mL for both analytes. The absence of matrix ion suppression was assessed by the post column infusion technique: during the injection of a blank matrix sample in the LC–MS system, BUD and 16α-HP standard solutions were directly and continuously infused into the MS interface [3].

Additional information

Background

Corticosteroids are anti-inflammatory drugs frequently used for the treatment of a wide range of diseases both in human and veterinary medicine. BUD is a non-halogenated glucocorticoid recently introduced in veterinary medicine for the treatment of respiratory and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), particularly in dogs refractory to systemic steroids. However, BUD veterinary-labeled products are not available on the market to date. BUD is rapidly metabolized and one of the main products in human is 16α-HP [2]. Although many different works have been published on the detection of BUD in human plasma [4], [5], [6], [7], only two studies are available on its determination in dog plasma, one of which written in Chinese [8], [9]; in addition, none of them simultaneously investigated both BUD and 16α-HP.
  7 in total

1.  Using total error concept for the validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of budesonide epimers in human plasma.

Authors:  B Streel; B Cahay; R Klinkenberg
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.205

2.  Budesonide quantification by HPLC coupled to atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) tandem mass spectrometry. Application to a comparative systemic bioavailability of two budesonide formulations in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Ney Carter do Carmo Borges; Rafael Barrientos Astigarraga; Carlos Eduardo Sverdloff; Bruno Carter Borges; Thaís Rodrigues Paiva; Paulo Rebelo Galvinas; Ronilson Agnaldo Moreno
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.205

3.  Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry determination of total budesonide levels in dog plasma after inhalation exposure.

Authors:  Seija Berg; Marika Melamies; Minna Rajamäki; Outi Vainio; Kimmo Peltonen
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Plasma concentrations and therapeutic effects of budesonide in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Marco Pietra; Federico Fracassi; Alessia Diana; Teresa Gazzotti; Giuliano Bettini; Angelo Peli; Maria Morini; Giampiero Pagliuca; Paola Roncada
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.156

5.  Simultaneous quantification of budesonide and its two metabolites, 6beta-hydroxybudesonide and 16alpha-hydroxyprednisolone, in human plasma by liquid chromatography negative electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yaning Wang; Yufei Tang; H Moellmann; Günther Hochhaus
Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Detection of budesonide in human urine after inhalation by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  K Deventer; P Mikulcíková; H Van Hoecke; P Van Eenoo; F T Delbeke
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.935

7.  [LC-MS/MS determination of budesonide in dog plasma].

Authors:  Pan Deng; Xiao-Tao Duan; Xiao-Yan Chen; San-Ming Li; Da-Fang Zhong
Journal:  Yao Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2008-01
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Effects of budesonide and surfactant in preterm fetal sheep.

Authors:  T Brett Kothe; Emily Royse; Matthew W Kemp; Augusto Schmidt; Fabrizio Salomone; Masatoshi Saito; Haruo Usuda; Shimpei Watanabe; Gabrielle C Musk; Alan H Jobe; Noah H Hillman
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.464

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.