Literature DB >> 27408813

Transcriptomic analyses of Hand2 transgenic embryos.

Noriko Funato1, Hiroki Kokubo2, Yumiko Saga3.   

Abstract

In this article, we further provide the data generated for the previously published research article "Specification of jaw identity by the Hand2 transcription factor." To better understand the downstream genes of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Hand2, we generated double-transgenic mice (Hand2 (NC) ) by intercrossing CAG-floxed CAT-Hand2 mice with Wnt1-Cre mice for conditional activation of Hand2 expression in the neural crest. Altered expression of Hand2 induces transformation of the upper jaw to the lower jaw in Hand2 (NC) mutant mice. This data article provides Tables detailing the differentially expressed genes between wild-type and Hand2 (NC) mutant embryos. The raw array data of our transcriptomes as generated using Affymetrix microarrays are available on the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) browser (Reference number GSE75805).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAG, the CMV early enhancer/chicken β actin; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyl transferase; Craniofacial development; Evolution; Jaw; Mandible; Neural crest; Vertebrates; aRNA, amplified RNA; bHLH, basic helix-loop-helix

Year:  2016        PMID: 27408813      PMCID: PMC4932614          DOI: 10.1016/j.gdata.2016.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genom Data        ISSN: 2213-5960


Direct link to deposited data

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE75805

Experimental design

The neural crest plays a key role in craniofacial development. The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor Hand2, is expressed in the branchial arch neural crest and is crucial for development of the cranial neural crest [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Mice lacking the Hand2 branchial arch-specific enhancer (termed Hand2) develop a spectrum of craniofacial defects, including a hypoplastic mandible, abnormal middle ear ossicles, and a cleft palate [4], [6]. Neural crest-specific ablation of Hand2 demonstrated that Hand2 is also necessary for the differentiation of sympathetic and enteric neurons [7], [8]. Hand2 expression is observed in the mandibular process of the first branchial arch but not in the maxillary process [4], [9]. Consistent with its expression pattern, the Hand2 sequence is conserved among jawed vertebrates but is less conserved among jawless vertebrates and invertebrates [9]. For the conditional activation of Hand2 in the neural crest, we generated double-transgenic mice (Hand2) by intercrossing CAG-floxed CAT-Hand2 mice with Wnt1-Cre mice. When we examined the contribution of Wnt1-Cre to craniofacial development using Rosa26 Reporter (R26R) mice, altered β-galactosidase staining was observed in the craniofacial region of Hand2 mutants (Fig. 1A). Conditional activation of Hand2 expression in the neural crest transforms the maxilla to the mandible (Fig. 4B), suggesting that Hand2 controls the specification of jaw identity [9]. Nested Hand2 expression in the mandibular process is also necessary for palatogenesis [9]. The duplicated Meckel's cartilage in the maxillary region was confirmed by alcian blue staining of Hand2 mutants (Fig. 1B). The maxilla-to-mandible transformation of the first branchial arch in Hand2 mutants indicated that altered Hand2 expression converts the genetic program from that of the maxillary to the mandibular process. To profile the mRNA levels from Hand2 embryos, we used an Affymetrix microarray platform (GeneChip Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Array) (Fig.1C). Our related work, which was recently published in Scientific Reports, used these molecular approaches to determine the downstream genes of Hand2 [9]. In this Data in Brief article, we provide additional information aiming to help other researchers interpret and use these datasets for their own research.
Fig. 1

Morphological transformation of the upper to the lower jaw in Hand2 mutants.

A. Whole-mount β-galactosidase staining of E16.5 control (a, c) and Hand2; Wnt1-Cre; R26R (b, d) embryos. fb, frontal bone; pb, parietal bone; ip, interparietal bone.

B. Alizarin red and alcian blue staining (a, b) and alcian blue staining (c, d) at E14.5 of wild-type (a, c) and Hand2 (b, d) embryos. The mutant maxillary bone (mx) is transformed to a duplicated mandibular bone (mb*) with duplicated Meckel's cartilage (mc*).

C. Flow chart of the experimental design. The whole-body or heads collected from wild-type and Hand2 embryos were used for the microarray experiment.

mc, Meckel's cartilage; mc*, duplicated Meckel's cartilage; mx, maxillary process; md, mandibular process; md*, duplicated mandibular process; fp, frontonasal process; mnp, medial nasal process. An asterisk indicates a duplicate.

Materials and methods

Generation of Hand2-mutant mice

CAG-floxed CAT-Hand2 mice (Hand2; Stock No.RBRC01366, RIKEN) have been described previously [9]. We generated Hand2 mutant mice by intercrossing Hand2 transgenic mice with Wnt1-Cre mice [10] (Stock No. 7807, The Jackson Laboratory). R26R mice (Stock No. 6148, The Jackson Laboratory) have been described previously [11]. Wild-type littermates were used as controls. All the experimental animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the Tokyo Medical and Dental University. All experiments were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Microarray study design

To determine the downstream genes of Hand2, we performed gene expression profiling on embryonic day (E) 11.5 Hand2 embryos (n = 4 per genotype) and E12.5 Hand2 heads (n = 3 per genotype). We routinely freeze our samples at − 80 °C. Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to manufacturer's instructions, and was resuspended in nuclease-free water. Total RNA was then purified with the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Replicate samples within the same genotype were grouped together. For each RNA sample, concentration and purity were measured using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrometer, and RNA quality was examined with the 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). All RNA integrity number (RIN) scores were 10 (Fig. 2A).
Fig. 2

RNA quality control.

A. RNA quality was measured using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer for wild-type (a, c) and Hand2 mutant (b, d) samples at E11.5 (a, b) and E12.5 (c, d). The RNA Integrity Number (RIN; value assigned from 0 to 10) and histograms are shown.

B. Scatter plots showing the correlation of signal values between two samples from E11.5 (a) and E12.5 (b) embryos. Data assigned to absent calls were omitted.

C. qPCR analysis of the Hand2 transcript levels from wild-type (WT) and Hand2 (Tg) embryos at E11.5 (a) and E12.5 (b). Hand2 expression was upregulated in the Hand2 embryos. The experimental data were analyzed using two-tailed Student's t-tests and were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). P-values less than 0.05 were considered as significant.

RNA labeling and hybridization

The microarray analysis was performed by the KURABO Bio-Medical Department using the Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Array. Biotin-modified amplified RNA (aRNA) was prepared from 250 ng total RNA according to the standard Affymetrix protocol (GeneChip 3′ IVT Express Kit User Manual, P/N 702646 Rev.1 Affymetrix). Following fragmentation to approximately 35–200 nt aRNA fragments with a peak at approximately 100–120 nt, 10 μg of aRNA were hybridized for 16 h at 45 °C on a GeneChip. The GeneChip was washed, stained in the Affymetrix Fluidics Station 450, and then scanned using the GeneChip Scanner 3000 (Affymetrix 00-0074).

Data normalization and analysis

The data were analyzed with the GeneChip Operating Software ver1.4 (MAS 5.0) using the default Affymetrix analysis settings and global scaling as the normalization method. The trimmed mean target intensity of each array was arbitrarily set to 500. Using this algorithm, present, marginal, or absent calls were obtained for each probe set in each array. For the comparative analysis of gene expression profiles, data assigned to absent calls were omitted. Scatter plots of normalized signal values are shown in Fig. 2B. The change in expression level for a transcript between a baseline and an experimental array was expressed as the log2 ratio. A signal log ratio of 1 is the same as a fold change of 2. Upon gene expression profiling on Hand2 embryos, 17 genes, including the Hand2 gene, were found to be upregulated and 51 genes were downregulated, with a two-fold change cut-off in E11.5 Hand2 embryos (Table A.1) [9]. In E12.5 Hand2 heads, 61 genes, including the Hand2 gene, were upregulated, and 84 genes were downregulated, with a two-fold change cut-off change (Table B.1) [9]. The ontology analyses of the altered genes have been previously reported [9].

Alcian blue and β-galactosidase staining

Alcian blue staining and whole-mount β-galactosidase staining were performed as described previously [12].

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

qPCR was performed as previously described [13]. All data were normalized to Actb (β-actin) expression. qPCR assays were performed in triplicate in three independent experiments. The primer sequences used for amplification were as follows: Hand2 forward: 5′-CCTCTTTCACGTCGGTCTTC-3′, Hand2 reverse: 5′-AAGATCAAGACACTGCGCCT-3′; and Actb forward: 5′-ATGGAGGGGAATACAGCCC-3′, Actb reverse: 5′-TTCTTTGCAGCTCCTTCGTT-3′.

Results and discussion

Gene expression changes between genetic cohorts were validated by real-time qPCR (Fig. 2C). Consistently, qPCR analyses confirmed the upregulation of Hand2 (Fig. 2C). To verify the microarray data, 20 genes were selected and whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed, and the results were found consistent with the microarray findings (Figs. 3 and 4 of [9]). Thus, we conclude that the overall reproducibility of the microarray gene expression data sets is very good. The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Table A.1

Affymetrix array data for E11.5 Hand2-mutant embryos. Affymetrix array data for E11.5 Hand2 embryos (n = 4) and their corresponding wild-type littermates (n = 4). Signal values, present/absent calls, and detection p-values are shown for each probe set.

Table B.1

Affymetrix array data for E12.5 Hand2-mutant heads. Affymetrix array data for E12.5 Hand2 heads (n = 3) and corresponding wild-type heads (n = 3). Signal values, present/absent calls, and detection p-values are shown for each probe set.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Specifications
Organism/cell line/tissueMus musculus
SexN/A
StrainA mixed C57BL/6J × ICR genetic background
Sequencer or array typeAffymetrix GeneChip Mouse Genome 430 2.0
Data formatRaw
Experimental factorsWild-type and Hand2 transgenic mice; Altered expression of Hand2 in the neural crest
Experimental featuresFor the conditional activation of Hand2, Wnt1-Cre male mice were crossed with CAG-CAT Hand2Tg/+ females, generating Hand2NC mutant and age-matched littermates. Transcriptomes from Hand2NC mutants and age-matched littermates were assayed on an Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Genome 430 2.0 array to investigate the effect of Hand2 on global gene expression.
ConsentThe data are publicly available and open for re-use given appropriate citation.
Sample source locationTokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  13 in total

1.  Hand2 is necessary for terminal differentiation of enteric neurons from crest-derived precursors but not for their migration into the gut or for formation of glia.

Authors:  Fabien D'Autréaux; Yuka Morikawa; Peter Cserjesi; Michael D Gershon
Journal:  Development       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain.

Authors:  P Soriano
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Regulation of cardiac mesodermal and neural crest development by the bHLH transcription factor, dHAND.

Authors:  D Srivastava; T Thomas; Q Lin; M L Kirby; D Brown; E N Olson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Targeted deletion of a branchial arch-specific enhancer reveals a role of dHAND in craniofacial development.

Authors:  Hiromi Yanagisawa; David E Clouthier; James A Richardson; Jeroen Charité; Eric N Olson
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Modification of gene activity in mouse embryos in utero by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre recombinase.

Authors:  P S Danielian; D Muccino; D H Rowitch; S K Michael; A P McMahon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Hand2 determines the noradrenergic phenotype in the mouse sympathetic nervous system.

Authors:  Yuka Morikawa; Fabien D'Autréaux; Michael D Gershon; Peter Cserjesi
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Loss of Tbx1 induces bone phenotypes similar to cleidocranial dysplasia.

Authors:  Noriko Funato; Masataka Nakamura; James A Richardson; Deepak Srivastava; Hiromi Yanagisawa
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  The Transcription Factor Hand1 Is Involved In Runx2-Ihh-Regulated Endochondral Ossification.

Authors:  Lindsay E Laurie; Hiroki Kokubo; Masataka Nakamura; Yumiko Saga; Noriko Funato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Specification of jaw identity by the Hand2 transcription factor.

Authors:  Noriko Funato; Hiroki Kokubo; Masataka Nakamura; Hiromi Yanagisawa; Yumiko Saga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Misexpression of dHAND induces ectopic digits in the developing limb bud in the absence of direct DNA binding.

Authors:  David G McFadden; John McAnally; James A Richardson; Jeroen Charité; Eric N Olson
Journal:  Development       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.