Literature DB >> 2740861

Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope.

J F Roulet1, T Reich, U Blunck, M Noack.   

Abstract

Interface between restorative materials and tooth hard substances must be morphologically as perfect as possible to avoid plaque accumulation and subsequent secondary caries or pulpal diseases. Therefore the marginal behavior of restorations is an important parameter to predict their longevity. Morphologically, the quality of margins is characterized by different well defined criteria. Using a replica technique it is possible to assess the complete marginal circumference of restorations in the SEM. Margins of restorations show a large variety of their morphology. This publication describes a method to quantify the quality of dental restorations. The restoration margins are traced on the SEM screen with a digitizer and an interface to measure the margin's length. Simultaneously the margin quality is assessed and assigned to the corresponding lengths. The % distribution of the quality criteria for each restoration is then calculated. Using a comparative light microscope, the replicas are aligned and mounted identically in the SEM for longitudinal studies. The results presented are limited to tests for the accuracy of the method. Using 5 criteria to characterize the margin quality, it was found that the difference between two measurements by the same operator, 4 weeks apart was 3% +/- 2.6%. The largest difference for one group was 9%. In another accuracy test where 4 criteria for margin characterization were used, the difference between two measurements was 1.9% +/- 0.9%. The largest difference between two groups found was 3.4%. This method can be used for longitudinal studies in vivo, but also for in vitro screening tests with new materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2740861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scanning Microsc        ISSN: 0891-7035


  10 in total

1.  One-year evaluation of an Ormocer restorative-a multipractice clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael Rosin; Heike Steffen; Corinna Konschake; Uwe Greese; Dirk Teichmann; Axel Hartmann; Georg Meyer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable resin composite liner.

Authors:  Anders Lindberg; J W V van Dijken; P Hörstedt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  R Hickel; J-F Roulet; S Bayne; S D Heintze; I A Mjör; M Peters; V Rousson; R Randall; G Schmalz; M Tyas; G Vanherle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements.

Authors:  Carina Maria Aschenbrenner; Reinhold Lang; Gerhard Handel; Michael Behr
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Influence of proximal box elevation technique on marginal integrity of adhesively luted Cerec inlays.

Authors:  Veronika Müller; Karl-Heinz Friedl; Katrin Friedl; Sebastian Hahnel; Gerhard Handel; Reinhold Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Interfacial adaptation of a calcium aluminate cement used in class II cavities, in vivo.

Authors:  K Sunnegårdh-Grönberg; J W V van Dijken; A Lindberg; P Hörstedt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Marginal adaptation of three self-adhesive resin cements vs. a well-tried adhesive luting agent.

Authors:  M Behr; M Hansmann; M Rosentritt; G Handel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Marginal integrity of CAD/CAM fixed partial dentures.

Authors:  Martin Rosentritt; Michael Behr; Carola Kolbeck; Gerhard Handel
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2007-01

9.  Evaluation of the Validity of Digital Optical Microscopy in the Assessment of Marginal Adaptation of Dental Adhesive Interfaces.

Authors:  René Daher; Ivo Krejci; Enrico di Bella; Laurine Marger
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 4.329

10.  Marginal quality of ceramic inlays after three different instrumental cavity preparation methods of the proximal boxes.

Authors:  Ella A Naumova; Fabian Schiml; Wolfgang H Arnold; Andree Piwowarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.