| Literature DB >> 27408554 |
Julio A Lemos-Espinal1, Geoffrey R Smith2.
Abstract
We compiled a checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the state of Coahuila, Mexico. The list comprises 133 species (24 amphibians, 109 reptiles), representing 27 families (9 amphibians, 18 reptiles) and 65 genera (16 amphibians, 49 reptiles). Coahuila has a high richness of lizards in the genus Sceloporus. Coahuila has relatively few state endemics, but has several regional endemics. Overlap in the herpetofauna of Coahuila and bordering states is fairly extensive. Of the 132 species of native amphibians and reptiles, eight are listed as Vulnerable, six as Near Threatened, and six as Endangered in the IUCN Red List. In the SEMARNAT listing, 19 species are Subject to Special Protection, 26 are Threatened, and three are in Danger of Extinction. Coahuila is home to several species of conservation concern, especially lizards and turtles. Coahuila is an important state for the conservation of the native regional fauna.Entities:
Keywords: Biogeography; Checklist; Conservation Status; Herpetofauna; IUCN Red List
Year: 2016 PMID: 27408554 PMCID: PMC4926632 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.593.8484
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
Figure 1.Topographical map of the state of Coahuila (INEGI 2001).
Checklist of amphibians and reptiles of Coahuila. We also provide the Habitat type (CD, SM, TS), IUCN Status (DD; LC, V, NT; E; CE) according to the IUCN Red List (The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2014.2; www.iucnredlist.org; accessed 2 December 2015), ; the higher the score the greater the vulnerability) from Wilson et al. (2013a,b), and conservation status in Mexico according to SEMARNAT (2010) (P, A; Pr, NL). Source denotes whether the species was observed in the field by the authors (A), documented in the CONABIO data base and/or museum collections (C/M), or found in the literature (citation of source).
= Chihuahuan Desert
= Sierra Madre Oriental
= Tamaulipan Thornscrub
= Data Deficient
= Least Concern
= Vulnerable
= Neat Threatened
= Endangered
= Critically Endangered
Environmental Vulnerability Score
= in danger of extinction
= threatened
= subject to special protection
– not listed
| Habitat Type | IUCN |
| SEMARNAT listing | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class | |||||
| Order | |||||
| Family | |||||
|
|
| ? | 10 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
| ? | 16 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 18 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 17 |
| C/M |
| Order | |||||
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
| |
|
|
| 6 |
| ||
|
|
|
| 3 |
| C/M |
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 8 |
| C/M |
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 11 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 15 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| ? |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| ? |
| |
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 7 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
| Class | |||||
| Order | |||||
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 16 |
| C/M |
|
|
| 19 |
| C/M | |
|
|
| 18 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| 16 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 19 |
| C/M |
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
| C/M |
|
|
| 10 |
| C/M | |
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
| Order | |||||
| Suborder | |||||
| Family | |||||
|
|
| ? | 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
| C/M |
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
| C/M |
| Family | |||||
|
|
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
| ? | 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ? |
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
| C/M |
|
|
| ? | ? |
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
| C/M |
|
|
| ? | 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
| Grassland |
| 15 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 12 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
| C/M | |
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
| ? | 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
| Order | |||||
| Suborder | |||||
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
| Grassland in |
| 10 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ? |
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
|
|
| ? | 7 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 15 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
| C/M |
|
|
| 13 |
| C/M | |
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
| ? | 11 |
|
|
|
|
| ? | 6 |
|
|
|
|
| ? | 8 |
| C/M |
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
| 11 |
| C/M | |
|
|
|
| 13 |
| C/M |
|
|
| ? |
| C/M | |
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
| Family | |||||
|
|
|
| 14 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
| C/M |
|
|
|
| 13 |
| C/M |
Summary of species present in Coahuila by Family, Order or Suborder, and Class. Status summary indicates the number of species found in each IUCN conservation status in the Order DD, LC, V, NT, E, CE (see Table 1 for abbreviations; in some cases species have not been assigned a status by the IUCN and therefore these may not add up to the total number of species in a taxon). Mean EVS is the mean Environmental Vulnerability Score, scores ≥ 14 are considered high vulnerability (Wilson et al. 2013a,b) and conservation status in Mexico according to SEMARNAT (2010) in the Order NL, Pr, A, P (see Table 1 for abbreviations).
| Class | Order/ Suborder | Family | Genera | Species | Status Summary | Mean | SEMARNAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15.25 |
| |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0,1,0,0,0,0 | 10 | 1,0,0,0 | ||
|
| 2 | 3 | 0,0,1,2,0,0 | 17 | 1,1,1,0 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 3 | 7 | 0,7,0,0,0,0 | 7.43 | 6,1,0,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 1 | 0,1,0,0,0,0 | 8 | 1,0,0,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 3 | 0,2,1,0,0,0 | 13 | 3,0,0,0 | ||
|
| 4 | 4 | 0,3,0,0,0,0 | 6.33 | 4,0,0,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 1 | 0,1,0,0,0,0 | 9 | 0,1,0,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 2 | 0,2,0,0,0,0 | 8.5 | 1,1,0,0 | ||
|
| 2 | 2 | 0,2,0,0,0,0 | 4.5 | 2,0,0,0 | ||
|
|
|
|
| 9.14 |
| ||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 3 | 5 | 0,1,1,1,2,0 | 17.6 | 2,1,2,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 3 | 1,2,0,0,0,0 | 12.67 | 2,1,0,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 2 | 0,1,1,0,0,0 | 18.5 | 0,0,1,1 | ||
|
| 1 | 1 | 0,1,0,0,0,0 | 15 | 0,1,0,0 | ||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 2 | 3 | 0,2,0,0,0,0 | 15 | 2,0,1,0 | ||
|
| 2 | 4 | 0,2,1,0,1,0 | 13.5 | 1,1,2,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 2 | 0,2,0,0,0,0 | 14.5 | 2,0,0,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 1 | - | - | |||
|
| 7 | 29 | 0,16,2,3,3,0 | 13.3 | 20,2,5,2 | ||
|
| 2 | 6 | 0,4,0,0,0,0 | 12 | 4,1,1,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 4 | 0,3,0,0,0,0 | 12.75 | 4,0,0,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 1 | 0,1,0,0,0,0 | 15 | 1,0,0,0 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 14 | 25 | 0,24,0,0,0,0 | 10.6 | 16,0,9,0 | ||
|
| 4 | 4 | 0,1,0,0,0,0 | 7.25 | 3,1,0,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 1 | 0,1,0,0,0,0 | 11 | 1,0,0,0 | ||
|
| 1 | 3 | 0,2,0,0,0,0 | 12 | 3,0,0,0 | ||
|
| 3 | 7 | 0,6,1,0,0,0 | 10.6 | 3,0,4,0 | ||
|
| 3 | 8 | 0,8,0,0,0,0 | 11.6 | 1,7,0,0 | ||
|
|
|
|
| 12.3 |
| ||
| TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
Figure 2.. Cuatro Ciénegas, Coahuila. Species endemic to Coahuila. Photo courtesy of Michael Price.
Figure 3.. Cuatro Ciénegas, Coahuila. Species endemic to Coahuila. Photo courtesy of Peter Heimes.
Figure 4.. Cuatro Ciénegas, Coahuila. Species endemic to Coahuila. Photo courtesy of Peter Heimes.
Figure 5.(top: male; bottom: female). Sierra de San Lorenzo, Coahuila. Species endemic to Coahuila. Photos courtesy of Jimmy McGuire (male) and Tim Burkhardt (female).
Figure 6.(male). Dunas de Bilbao, Viesca, Coahuila. Species endemic to Coahuila. Photo by Julio Lemos-Espinal.
Total number of native amphibian and reptile species in each state arranged according to taxonomic Family (COH, CHI, SLP, DUR, NL, TX).
= Coahuila
= Chihuahua
= San Luis Potosí
= Durango
= Nuevo León
= Texas
| REGION |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLASS | |||||||
| Order | |||||||
|
| 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
|
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
| 23 | 3 | 1 | 4 | - | 2 | 16 |
|
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
| 2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 2 |
|
| 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
| Order | |||||||
|
| 16 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
|
| 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 12 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
|
| 22 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
|
| 2 | - | - | 2 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
| 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|
| 18 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
|
| 1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
| 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| CLASS | |||||||
| Order | |||||||
|
| 2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
| Order | |||||||
|
| 4 | - | - | - | - | - | 4 |
|
| 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
|
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
| 20 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 15 |
|
| 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
| 10 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
|
| 3 | 2 | 2 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 |
| Order | |||||||
| Suborder | |||||||
|
| 12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
|
| 2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
| 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
|
| 5 | - | 1 | 2 | 1 | - | 1 |
|
| 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
| 1 | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - |
|
| 3 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
|
| 51 | 29 | 24 | 19 | 26 | 27 | 19 |
|
| 1 | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - |
|
| 16 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
|
| 13 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
|
| 6 | 1 | - | 4 | 2 | 1 | - |
|
| 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
| Suborder | |||||||
|
| 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
|
| 65 | 25 | 35 | 36 | 31 | 31 | 33 |
|
| 33 | 4 | 10 | 19 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|
| 36 | 7 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 19 |
|
| 20 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 10 |
| TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of native amphibian and reptile species in each state arranged according to taxonomic Order/Suborder (abbreviations as in Table 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order/Suborder | ||||||
|
| 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 28 |
|
| 20 | 33 | 35 | 29 | 20 | 41 |
|
| 1 | 1 | ||||
|
| 11 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 30 |
|
| 49 | 50 | 45 | 49 | 41 | 45 |
|
| 48 | 73 | 82 | 59 | 60 | 75 |
| TOTAL | 132 | 173 | 176 | 145 | 130 | 220 |
Number of shared species between the six analyzed states (abbreviations as in Table 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| - | 75 | 72 | 74 | 102 | 94 |
|
| - | 108 | 61 | 65 | 81 | |
|
| - | 67 | 65 | 61 | ||
|
| - | 93 | 66 | |||
|
| - | 85 | ||||
|
| - |