S Murali Mohan1, S K Kaushik2. 1. Commandant & Dental Adviser (Air), Air Force Institute of Dental Sciences, Bangalore. 2. Classified Specialist (Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery), No 1 Air Force Dental Centre, New Delhi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The management of pulpally and apically infected teeth has evolved into a modality of conservation with predictable degree of success. Root canal treatment often requires protracted chairside time. A new technique involving placement of thermoplasticized core carrier obturators was compared with conventional lateral condensation technique. METHODS: A prospective, comparative, in-vivo cohort study was carried out on randomly selected 100 patients visiting a tertiary care centre from July 2005 to July 2007, for primary, non-surgical conservative management of teeth requiring root canal treatment. Two groups of fifty cases each were managed with lateral condensation and thermoplasticized core carrier obturation techniques. Outcome variables were rate of obturation and failure rates as assessed by clinical and radiological evaluation. RESULT: The time taken in case of lateral condensation of maxillary central incisor was 17.30 ± 3.373 minutes and 28.07 ± 2.586 minutes in case of mandibular molar. In the thermoplasticized carrier condensation technique, for the central incisors it took 13.00 ± 1.376 minutes and 21.07 ± 2.463 minutes for mandibular molars. The mean rank value for time taken for obturation as per Mann Whitney U test (p < 0.01) were 27.88 for maxillary incisor and 44.73 for mandibular molar in the lateral condensation technique and 13.13 and 16.27 respectively for thermoplasticized gutta percha carrier condensation. The values were statistically significant. With 16% and 14% cases having unsatisfactory filling as evaluated by post filling radiograph, Chi square test two tailed p value was 0.6836 and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. An absolute failure rate of 10% was seen in lateral condensation group and 6% in thermo-plasticized carrier condensation group. Fisher exact 2-tailed p value was 0.71 and the difference in failure rate was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Root canal obturation by thermoplasticized core carrier condensation technique is an effective alternative to conventional lateral condensation technique in terms of quick and successful outcome.
BACKGROUND: The management of pulpally and apically infected teeth has evolved into a modality of conservation with predictable degree of success. Root canal treatment often requires protracted chairside time. A new technique involving placement of thermoplasticized core carrier obturators was compared with conventional lateral condensation technique. METHODS: A prospective, comparative, in-vivo cohort study was carried out on randomly selected 100 patients visiting a tertiary care centre from July 2005 to July 2007, for primary, non-surgical conservative management of teeth requiring root canal treatment. Two groups of fifty cases each were managed with lateral condensation and thermoplasticized core carrier obturation techniques. Outcome variables were rate of obturation and failure rates as assessed by clinical and radiological evaluation. RESULT: The time taken in case of lateral condensation of maxillary central incisor was 17.30 ± 3.373 minutes and 28.07 ± 2.586 minutes in case of mandibular molar. In the thermoplasticized carrier condensation technique, for the central incisors it took 13.00 ± 1.376 minutes and 21.07 ± 2.463 minutes for mandibular molars. The mean rank value for time taken for obturation as per Mann Whitney U test (p < 0.01) were 27.88 for maxillary incisor and 44.73 for mandibular molar in the lateral condensation technique and 13.13 and 16.27 respectively for thermoplasticized gutta percha carrier condensation. The values were statistically significant. With 16% and 14% cases having unsatisfactory filling as evaluated by post filling radiograph, Chi square test two tailed p value was 0.6836 and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. An absolute failure rate of 10% was seen in lateral condensation group and 6% in thermo-plasticized carrier condensation group. Fisher exact 2-tailed p value was 0.71 and the difference in failure rate was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Root canal obturation by thermoplasticized core carrier condensation technique is an effective alternative to conventional lateral condensation technique in terms of quick and successful outcome.