G S Chopra1, P K Gupta2, A C Anand3, P P Varma4, V Nair5, Ramji Rai6. 1. Senior Advisor (Pathology and Immunology), Army Hospital (R and R), Delhi Cantt. 2. Reader, Department of Blood Transfusion, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune. 4. Senior Advisor (Medicine and Nephrology), Army Hospital (R and R), Delhi Cantt. 5. Senior Advisor, (Medicine and Haematology), Army Hospital (R and R), Delhi Cantt. 6. Director General Medical Services (Army), Army Head Quarters, New Delhi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HBV DNA quantitation is used extensively world wide for the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, it has still to be popular in India. The aim of this study was to quantitate HBV - DNA by Real time - PCR method in Hepatitis B and in immuno-compromised patients, to compare the results with HBeAg detection and to monitor the response to therapy of chronic Hepatitis B patients to antivirals. METHODS: Ninety one serum samples of Hepatitis group of patients (all HBsAg positive), 41 samples from immuno-compromised patients (all HBsAg negative) and 49 patients of Chronic Hepatitis B group (all HBsAg positive) were the subjects of this first ever study in Armed Forces. Twenty serum samples from healthy volunteers and non-hepatitis B patients served as negative controls. The amplification detection was carried out in a Rotor-Gene 2000-sequence detector. RESULTS: Amongst Hepatitis B group, 33% (30/91) of the samples were positive for HBV-DNA and 26% (24/91) of samples were positive for HBeAg. In the immuno-compromised group of patients 14.6% (6/11) of samples were positive for HIV-DNA and 9.7% (4/41) were positive for HBeAg. Of the Chronic Hepatitis B patients on treatment, all (100%) were positive by HBV-DNA, whereas 29/49 (59.2%) were positive by HBeAg before treatment. After treatment with antivirals, 06/49 (12.2%) were positive by both tests and 11/49 (22.5%) were positive only by HBV-DNA. 32/49 (65.3%) patients became negative serologically after therapy. CONCLUSION: HBeAg status did not necessarily reflect HBV-DNA level in the serum, as 10/91 (11%) in the Hepatitis B group, 2/41 (4.9%) in the immuno compromised group and 20/49 (40.8%) patients in the Chronic Hepatitis B group were positive for HBV-DNA but negative for HBeAg. HBV-DNA was not found to be positive amongst any of the negative controls. Real time - PCR is a sensitive and reproducible assay for HBV-DNA quantitation and may be started in Armed Forces referral centers in the near future.
BACKGROUND:HBV DNA quantitation is used extensively world wide for the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, it has still to be popular in India. The aim of this study was to quantitate HBV - DNA by Real time - PCR method in Hepatitis B and in immuno-compromised patients, to compare the results with HBeAg detection and to monitor the response to therapy of chronic Hepatitis Bpatients to antivirals. METHODS: Ninety one serum samples of Hepatitis group of patients (all HBsAg positive), 41 samples from immuno-compromised patients (all HBsAg negative) and 49 patients of Chronic Hepatitis B group (all HBsAg positive) were the subjects of this first ever study in Armed Forces. Twenty serum samples from healthy volunteers and non-hepatitis Bpatients served as negative controls. The amplification detection was carried out in a Rotor-Gene 2000-sequence detector. RESULTS: Amongst Hepatitis B group, 33% (30/91) of the samples were positive for HBV-DNA and 26% (24/91) of samples were positive for HBeAg. In the immuno-compromised group of patients 14.6% (6/11) of samples were positive for HIV-DNA and 9.7% (4/41) were positive for HBeAg. Of the Chronic Hepatitis Bpatients on treatment, all (100%) were positive by HBV-DNA, whereas 29/49 (59.2%) were positive by HBeAg before treatment. After treatment with antivirals, 06/49 (12.2%) were positive by both tests and 11/49 (22.5%) were positive only by HBV-DNA. 32/49 (65.3%) patients became negative serologically after therapy. CONCLUSION: HBeAg status did not necessarily reflect HBV-DNA level in the serum, as 10/91 (11%) in the Hepatitis B group, 2/41 (4.9%) in the immuno compromised group and 20/49 (40.8%) patients in the Chronic Hepatitis B group were positive for HBV-DNA but negative for HBeAg. HBV-DNA was not found to be positive amongst any of the negative controls. Real time - PCR is a sensitive and reproducible assay for HBV-DNA quantitation and may be started in Armed Forces referral centers in the near future.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antivirals; Chronic Hepatitis B; HBV – DNA; Real time – PCR
Authors: A Abe; K Inoue; T Tanaka; J Kato; N Kajiyama; R Kawaguchi; S Tanaka; M Yoshiba; M Kohara Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: K Yamamoto; M Horikita; F Tsuda; K Itoh; Y Akahane; S Yotsumoto; H Okamoto; Y Miyakawa; M Mayumi Journal: J Virol Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 5.103