Literature DB >> 27406833

External validation of the emergency department assessment of chest pain score accelerated diagnostic pathway (EDACS-ADP).

Dylan Flaws1, Martin Than2, Frank Xavier Scheuermeyer3, James Christenson4, Barbara Boychuk5, Jaimi H Greenslade6, Sally Aldous7, Christopher J Hammett8, William A Parsonage8, Joanne M Deely9, John W Pickering10, Louise Cullen6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The emergency department assessment of chest pain score accelerated diagnostic pathway (EDACS-ADP) facilitates low-risk ED chest pain patients early to outpatient investigation. We aimed to validate this rule in a North American population.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective validation of the EDACS-ADP using 763 chest pain patients who presented to St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada, between June 2000 and January 2003. Patients were classified as low risk if they had an EDACS <16, no new ischaemia on ECG and non-elevated serial 0-hour and 2-hour cardiac troponin concentrations. The primary outcome was the number of patients who had a predetermined major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 30 days after presentation.
RESULTS: Of the 763 patients, 317 (41.6%) were classified as low risk by the EDACS-ADP. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of the EDACS-ADP for 30-day MACE were 100% (95% CI 94.2% to 100%), 46.4% (95% CI 42.6% to 50.2%), 100% (95% CI 98.5% to 100.0%) and 17.5% (95% CI 14.1% to 21.3%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study validated the EDACS-ADP in a novel context and supports its safe use in a North American population. It confirms that EDACS-ADP can facilitate progression to early outpatient investigation in up to 40% of ED chest pain patients within 2 hours. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome; effectiveness; risk management; statistics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27406833     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  A prospective multi-centre study assessing the safety and effectiveness following the implementation of an accelerated chest pain pathway using point-of-care troponin for use in New Zealand rural hospital and primary care settings.

Authors:  Rory Miller; Garry Nixon; John W Pickering; Tim Stokes; Robin M Turner; Joanna Young; Marc Gutenstein; Michelle Smith; Tim Norman; Antony Watson; Peter George; Gerald Devlin; Stephen Du Toit; Martin Than
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Feasibility of the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule to safely reduce unnecessary hospital admissions: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard Body; Charles Boachie; Alex McConnachie; Simon Carley; Patricia Van Den Berg; Fiona E Lecky
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  Acute coronary syndromes diagnosis, version 2.0: Tomorrow's approach to diagnosing acute coronary syndromes?

Authors:  Richard Body
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-07-13

4.  Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dustin G Mark; Jie Huang; Dustin W Ballard; Mamata V Kene; Dana R Sax; Uli K Chettipally; James S Lin; Sean C Bouvet; Dale M Cotton; Megan L Anderson; Ian D McLachlan; Laura E Simon; Judy Shan; Adina S Rauchwerger; David R Vinson; Mary E Reed
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Typical and Atypical Symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Time to Retire the Terms?

Authors:  Holli A DeVon; Sahereh Mirzaei; Jessica Zègre-Hemsey
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.