Literature DB >> 27406665

A Method for Assessing Auditory Spatial Analysis in Reverberant Multitalker Environments.

Tobias Weller1,2,3, Virginia Best4, Jörg M Buchholz1,2,3, Taegan Young2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deficits in spatial hearing can have a negative impact on listeners' ability to orient in their environment and follow conversations in noisy backgrounds and may exacerbate the experience of hearing loss as a handicap. However, there are no good tools available for reliably capturing the spatial hearing abilities of listeners in complex acoustic environments containing multiple sounds of interest.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore a new method to measure auditory spatial analysis in a reverberant multitalker scenario. RESEARCH
DESIGN: This study was a descriptive case control study. STUDY SAMPLE: Ten listeners with normal hearing (NH) aged 20-31 yr and 16 listeners with hearing impairment (HI) aged 52-85 yr participated in the study. The latter group had symmetrical sensorineural hearing losses with a four-frequency average hearing loss of 29.7 dB HL. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A large reverberant room was simulated using a loudspeaker array in an anechoic chamber. In this simulated room, 96 scenes comprising between one and six concurrent talkers at different locations were generated. Listeners were presented with 45-sec samples of each scene, and were required to count, locate, and identify the gender of all talkers, using a graphical user interface on an iPad. Performance was evaluated in terms of correctly counting the sources and accuracy in localizing their direction.
RESULTS: Listeners with NH were able to reliably analyze scenes with up to four simultaneous talkers, while most listeners with hearing loss demonstrated errors even with two talkers at a time. Localization performance decreased in both groups with increasing number of talkers and was significantly poorer in listeners with HI. Overall performance was significantly correlated with hearing loss.
CONCLUSIONS: This new method appears to be useful for estimating spatial abilities in realistic multitalker scenes. The method is sensitive to the number of sources in the scene, and to effects of sensorineural hearing loss. Further work will be needed to compare this method to more traditional single-source localization tests. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27406665     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  8 in total

1.  How many images are in an auditory scene?

Authors:  Xuan Zhong; William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The relative size of auditory scenes of multiple talkers.

Authors:  William A Yost; M Torben Pastore; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech detection and localization in a reverberant multitalker environment by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Jörg M Buchholz; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The Effect of Hearing Loss on Localization of Amplitude-Panned and Physical Sources.

Authors:  Gregory M Ellis; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  David Yun; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.

Authors:  Baljeet Rana; Jörg M Buchholz; Catherine Morgan; Mridula Sharma; Tobias Weller; Shivali Appaiah Konganda; Kyoko Shirai; Atsushi Kawano
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Sensitivity to Angular and Radial Source Movements as a Function of Acoustic Complexity in Normal and Impaired Hearing.

Authors:  Micha Lundbeck; Giso Grimm; Volker Hohmann; Søren Laugesen; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  The Quest for Ecological Validity in Hearing Science: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Advance It.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Graham Naylor; Douglas S Brungart; Andreas Caduff; Jennifer Campos; Simon Carlile; Mark G Carpenter; Giso Grimm; Volker Hohmann; Inga Holube; Stefan Launer; Thomas Lunner; Ravish Mehra; Frances Rapport; Malcolm Slaney; Karolina Smeds
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.