OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between level of food security and diabetes self-management among food pantry clients, which is largely not possible using clinic-based sampling methods. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: Community-based food pantries in California, Ohio and Texas, USA, from March 2012 through March 2014. SUBJECTS: Convenience sample of adults with diabetes queuing at pantries (n 1237; 83 % response). Sampled adults were stratified as food secure, low food secure or very low food secure. We used point-of-care glycated Hb (HbA1c) testing to determine glycaemic control and captured diabetes self-management using validated survey items. RESULTS: The sample was 70 % female, 55 % Latino/Hispanic, 25 % white and 10 % black/African American, with a mean age of 56 years. Eighty-four per cent were food insecure, one-half of whom had very low food security. Mean HbA1c was 8·1 % and did not vary significantly by food security status. In adjusted models, very-low-food-secure participants, compared with both low-food-secure and food-secure participants, had poorer diabetes self-efficacy, greater diabetes distress, greater medication non-adherence, higher prevalence of severe hypoglycaemic episodes, higher prevalence of depressive symptoms, more medication affordability challenges, and more food and medicine or health supply trade-offs. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies of the health impact of food security have been able to examine very low food security. In a food pantry sample with high rates of food insecurity, we found that diabetes self-management becomes increasingly difficult as food security worsens. The efficacy of interventions to improve diabetes self-management may increase if food security is simultaneously addressed.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between level of food security and diabetes self-management among food pantry clients, which is largely not possible using clinic-based sampling methods. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: Community-based food pantries in California, Ohio and Texas, USA, from March 2012 through March 2014. SUBJECTS: Convenience sample of adults with diabetes queuing at pantries (n 1237; 83 % response). Sampled adults were stratified as food secure, low food secure or very low food secure. We used point-of-care glycated Hb (HbA1c) testing to determine glycaemic control and captured diabetes self-management using validated survey items. RESULTS: The sample was 70 % female, 55 % Latino/Hispanic, 25 % white and 10 % black/African American, with a mean age of 56 years. Eighty-four per cent were food insecure, one-half of whom had very low food security. Mean HbA1c was 8·1 % and did not vary significantly by food security status. In adjusted models, very-low-food-secure participants, compared with both low-food-secure and food-secure participants, had poorer diabetes self-efficacy, greater diabetes distress, greater medication non-adherence, higher prevalence of severe hypoglycaemic episodes, higher prevalence of depressive symptoms, more medication affordability challenges, and more food and medicine or health supply trade-offs. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies of the health impact of food security have been able to examine very low food security. In a food pantry sample with high rates of food insecurity, we found that diabetes self-management becomes increasingly difficult as food security worsens. The efficacy of interventions to improve diabetes self-management may increase if food security is simultaneously addressed.
Authors: Hilary K Seligman; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Andrea Lopez; Urmimala Sarkar; Jeanne Tschann; Alicia Fernandez Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-07-11
Authors: William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher; Jay Earles; R James Dudl; Joel Lees; Joseph Mullan; Richard A Jackson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Julie Silverman; James Krieger; Meghan Kiefer; Paul Hebert; June Robinson; Karin Nelson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Courtney R Lyles; Michael S Wolf; Dean Schillinger; Terry C Davis; Darren Dewalt; Allison R Dahlke; Laura Curtis; Hilary K Seligman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Seth A Berkowitz; Sara Kalkhoran; Samuel T Edwards; Utibe R Essien; Travis P Baggett Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Emily B Schroeder; Chan Zeng; Andrew T Sterrett; Tina K Kimpo; Andrea R Paolino; John F Steiner Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Rebekah J Walker; Rebecca G Knapp; Clara E Dismuke-Greer; Renee E Walker; Mukoso N Ozieh; Leonard E Egede Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-11-07 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Hilary K Seligman; Morgan Smith; Sophie Rosenmoss; Michelle Berger Marshall; Elaine Waxman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Rebekah J Walker; Ajay Chawla; Emma Garacci; Joni S Williams; Carlos Mendez; Mukoso N Ozieh; Leonard E Egede Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: B Brett Finlay; Katherine R Amato; Meghan Azad; Martin J Blaser; Thomas C G Bosch; Hiutung Chu; Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello; Stanislav Dusko Ehrlich; Eran Elinav; Naama Geva-Zatorsky; Philippe Gros; Karen Guillemin; Frédéric Keck; Tal Korem; Margaret J McFall-Ngai; Melissa K Melby; Mark Nichter; Sven Pettersson; Hendrik Poinar; Tobias Rees; Carolina Tropini; Liping Zhao; Tamara Giles-Vernick Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 11.205