Literature DB >> 27406177

Initial outcomes of a harmonized approach to collect welfare data in sport and leisure horses.

E Dalla Costa1, F Dai1, D Lebelt2, P Scholz2, S Barbieri1, E Canali1, M Minero1.   

Abstract

A truthful snapshot of horse welfare conditions is a prerequisite for predicting the impact of any actions intended to improve the quality of life of horses. This can be achieved when welfare information, gathered by different assessors in diverse geographical areas, is valid, comparable and collected in a harmonized way. This paper aims to present the first outcomes of the Animal Welfare Indicators (AWIN) approach: the results of on-farm assessment and a reliable and harmonized data collection system. A total of 355 sport and leisure horses, stabled in 40 facilities in Italy and in Germany, were evaluated by three trained assessors using the AWIN welfare assessment protocol for horses. The AWINHorse app was used to collect, store and send data to a common server. Identified welfare issues were obesity, unsatisfactory box dimensions, long periods of confinement and lack of social interaction. The digitalized data collection was feasible in an on-farm environment, and our results suggest that this approach could prove useful in identifying the most relevant welfare issues of horses in Europe or worldwide.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AWIN; animal-based indicator; data collection; horse; welfare assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27406177     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731116001452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  6 in total

1.  An Indication of Reliability of the Two-Level Approach of the AWIN Welfare Assessment Protocol for Horses.

Authors:  Irena Czycholl; Kathrin Büttner; Philipp Klingbeil; Joachim Krieter
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  A standardised equine-based welfare assessment tool used for six years in low and middle income countries.

Authors:  Rebecca Sommerville; Ashleigh F Brown; Melissa Upjohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Examining Canadian Equine Industry Participants' Perceptions of Horses and Their Welfare.

Authors:  Cordelie DuBois; Lindsay Nakonechny; Emilie Derisoud; Katrina Merkies
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Text Mining Analysis to Evaluate Stakeholders' Perception Regarding Welfare of Equines, Small Ruminants, and Turkeys.

Authors:  Emanuela Dalla Costa; Vito Tranquillo; Francesca Dai; Michela Minero; Monica Battini; Silvana Mattiello; Sara Barbieri; Valentina Ferrante; Lorenzo Ferrari; Adroaldo Zanella; Elisabetta Canali
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Quality of Life within Horse Welfare Assessment Tools: Informing Decisions for Chronically Ill and Geriatric Horses.

Authors:  Mariessa Long; Christian Dürnberger; Florien Jenner; Zsófia Kelemen; Ulrike Auer; Herwig Grimm
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Determining a Welfare Prioritization for Horses Using a Delphi Method.

Authors:  Fiona C Rioja-Lang; Melanie Connor; Heather Bacon; Cathy M Dwyer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.