Günther Herzer1, Udo Illievich2, Wolfgang G Voelckel3, Helmut Trimmel4. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Karl Landsteiner Institute of Emergency Medicine, General Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Corvinusring 3-5, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria. 2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Landes-Nervenklinik Wagner-Jauregg, Linz, Austria. 3. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, AUVA Trauma Centre Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. 4. Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Karl Landsteiner Institute of Emergency Medicine, General Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Corvinusring 3-5, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria. helmut.trimmel@wienerneustadt.lknoe.at.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The task force Neuroanaesthesia of the Austrian Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine (ÖGARI) is aiming to develop and provide recommendations in order to improve neurocritical care in Austria. Thus, a survey on neurocritical care concepts in Austria regarding intensive care of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) was performed to assess the current status. METHODS: An online internet questionnaire comprising 59 items on current concepts of SAH and TBI critical care was sent to 117 anaesthesiology departments. RESULTS: The survey was answered by 30 (25.6 %) of the hospitals, 24 (80 %) of them treating patients with SAH and/or TBI. Data from ten SAH centres reveal that definitive care was achieved within 24 h in all hospitals; a case load >50 per year is noted in 70 % of intensive care units (ICU). In all, 50 % of departments employ written protocols for treatment. Regarding the treatment of TBI patients, 14 answers were received, indicating that 42.9 % of departments provide care for >50 patients per year. Time between arrival and CT scan is <30 min in all hospitals, and 28.6 % of departments rely on written protocols. Only 14.3 % of hospitals report about routine morbidity and mortality rounds. While the neurologic status is assessed at discharge from the ICU, there is no evaluation of 1‑year outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive care of SAH and TBI patients is achieved timely in Austria. When compared with SAH, more hospitals with lower case loads take care of TBI patients. Written guidelines and protocols at institutional level are often missing. Since routine morbidity and mortality conferences are sparse, and long-term outcome is not assessed, there is room for improvement.
OBJECTIVES: The task force Neuroanaesthesia of the Austrian Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine (ÖGARI) is aiming to develop and provide recommendations in order to improve neurocritical care in Austria. Thus, a survey on neurocritical care concepts in Austria regarding intensive care of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) was performed to assess the current status. METHODS: An online internet questionnaire comprising 59 items on current concepts of SAH and TBI critical care was sent to 117 anaesthesiology departments. RESULTS: The survey was answered by 30 (25.6 %) of the hospitals, 24 (80 %) of them treating patients with SAH and/or TBI. Data from ten SAH centres reveal that definitive care was achieved within 24 h in all hospitals; a case load >50 per year is noted in 70 % of intensive care units (ICU). In all, 50 % of departments employ written protocols for treatment. Regarding the treatment of TBIpatients, 14 answers were received, indicating that 42.9 % of departments provide care for >50 patients per year. Time between arrival and CT scan is <30 min in all hospitals, and 28.6 % of departments rely on written protocols. Only 14.3 % of hospitals report about routine morbidity and mortality rounds. While the neurologic status is assessed at discharge from the ICU, there is no evaluation of 1‑year outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive care of SAH and TBIpatients is achieved timely in Austria. When compared with SAH, more hospitals with lower case loads take care of TBIpatients. Written guidelines and protocols at institutional level are often missing. Since routine morbidity and mortality conferences are sparse, and long-term outcome is not assessed, there is room for improvement.
Authors: Brett E Skolnick; Andrew I Maas; Raj K Narayan; Roland Gerritsen van der Hoop; Thomas MacAllister; John D Ward; Neta R Nelson; Nino Stocchetti Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Andrew Josephson; Vanja C Douglas; Michael T Lawton; Joey D English; Wade S Smith; Nerissa U Ko Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Michael N Diringer; Thomas P Bleck; J Claude Hemphill; David Menon; Lori Shutter; Paul Vespa; Nicolas Bruder; E Sander Connolly; Giuseppe Citerio; Daryl Gress; Daniel Hänggi; Brian L Hoh; Giuseppe Lanzino; Peter Le Roux; Alejandro Rabinstein; Erich Schmutzhard; Nino Stocchetti; Jose I Suarez; Miriam Treggiari; Ming-Yuan Tseng; Mervyn D I Vergouwen; Stefan Wolf; Gregory Zipfel Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Ian Roberts; David Yates; Peter Sandercock; Barbara Farrell; Jonathan Wasserberg; Gabrielle Lomas; Rowland Cottingham; Petr Svoboda; Nigel Brayley; Guy Mazairac; Véronique Laloë; Angeles Muñoz-Sánchez; Miguel Arango; Bennie Hartzenberg; Hussein Khamis; Surakrant Yutthakasemsunt; Edward Komolafe; Fatos Olldashi; Yadram Yadav; Francisco Murillo-Cabezas; Haleema Shakur; Phil Edwards Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Oct 9-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Peter J D Andrews; H Louise Sinclair; Aryelly Rodriguez; Bridget A Harris; Claire G Battison; Jonathan K J Rhodes; Gordon D Murray Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Guenther Herzer; Claudia Mirth; Udo M Illievich; Wolfgang G Voelckel; Helmut Trimmel Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Helmut Trimmel; Marek Majdan; Andrea Wodak; Guenther Herzer; Daniel Csomor; Alexandra Brazinova Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 1.704