Literature DB >> 27405224

Patch testing in Iranian children with allergic contact dermatitis.

Hossein Mortazavi1,2, Amirhooshang Ehsani1,2, Seyed Sajed Sajjadi2, Nessa Aghazadeh3,4,5, Ebrahim Arian6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis is a common disorder in adults and children alike and appears to be on the increase. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitization trends in Iranian children with contact dermatitis.
METHODS: The result of 109 patch tests performed using the 24 allergens of the European Standard Series in patients below 18 years old from September 2007 to March 2009 were recorded and analyzed. The tests were evaluated at 48 and 72 h after performing.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 72 (66.1 %) females and 37 (33.9 %) males. Hands were the most commonly affected anatomic site. In the final evaluation of the tests on day three, 51 (46.8 %) individuals showed a positive reaction to at least one allergen. Females were significantly more likely to show a positive response to at least one allergen (p-value = 0.031, odds ratio: 2.46). The most common allergens were nickel sulfate, cobalt, methylisothiazolinone, and colophony with 21 (19.3 %), 11 (10.1 %), 7 (6.4 %), and 6 (5.5 %) positive reactions, respectively. Contact allergy to nickel sulfate was more common in females than males (23.6 % vs. 10.8 %). There was no statistically significant relationship between personal or family history of atopy and a positive reaction to patch testing. The clinical and practical relevance were assessed for nickel and cobalt with a clinical current relevance in 11 (52.3 %) and 4 (36.4 %), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Nickel sulfate, cobalt, methylisothiazolinone, and colophony are the most common allergens responsible for induction of allergic contact dermatitis in Iranian children and adolescents. Females tended to show more positive reactions to allergens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Allergic contact dermatitis; Children; Contact allergens; Patch testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27405224      PMCID: PMC4943022          DOI: 10.1186/s12895-016-0047-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Dermatol        ISSN: 1471-5945


Background

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is an inflammatory skin disease caused by a T-cell-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction [1]. In ACD, the hapten is initially introduced to the epidermal langerhans cells. These cells migrate to the regional lymph nodes and the allergen is subsequently processed by the T-lymphocytes. Upon re-exposure of the allergen, CD8+ T-cells response is mediated by the CD4+ T-cell subset [2]. ACD affects up to 20 % of the pediatric population [3]. According to previous studies, 14.5 to 70.7 % of children with a clinical diagnosis of contact dermatitis have positive reactions to one of the applied allergens for patch testing [4, 5]. Based on a recent review of five patch test studies in children, the most commonly reported allergens in children are neomycin, balsam of Peru, fragrance mix, lanolin, cocamidopropylbetaine, formaldehyde, corticosteroids, methylchlorisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, propylene glycol, and benzalkonium chloride [6]. Properly performed and interpreted patch testing is the gold standard for identification and documentation of allergic sensitization and its inducing agents in children and adults [7, 8]. Although patch testing in children is not approved by the FDA, it has proven to be a safe procedure both in adults and children [9]. There are no rules and limitations for patch testing in children in Iran. Therefore, we often use it on similar approved indication for adults. The purpose of this study was to determine the causes of allergic contact dermatitis and identify the pattern of allergen responsiveness in Iranian children and adolescents affected by ACD.

Methods

The study was approved by Tehran University of Medical Scienced board of ethics. Registered data of 109 patch tests performed in individuals younger than 18 years old diagnosed clinically and/or histopathologically with allergic contact dermatitis and referred by dermatologists for patch testing were collected and analyzed. We used the ESS (European Standard Series Hermal, Reinbek, Germany) at similar allergen concentrations as for adults. The allergens were applied on the healthy skin of the patients’ backs and left for 48 h. Readings were performed at 48 h, 72 h and after patch testing (on day 2 and day 3). Reactions were classified and documented according to the criteria of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) as follows: (0 = negative), (+/− = doubtful), (+ = erythema), (++ = papule vesicle formation), and (+++ = bulla formation or ulceration) [7].

Statistical analysis

Data management and descriptive statistical analysis were performed using the SPSS 16 statistical program. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used and a P-value less than 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference.

Results

The study population consisted of 37 (33.9 %) males and 72 (66.1 %) females. The mean age was 14.4 with a standard deviation of 3.4 years (range: 5–18 years). A positive personal history of atopy was recorded in 48 patients (44.0 %). Forty one (37.6 %) had a positive family history of atopy. Anatomic sites of involvement in order of frequency are shown in Table 1. Hands were the most common site of involvement (Additional files 1 and 2).
Table 1

Anatomic sites of involvement in order of frequency

Anatomic sites of involvementFrequency
Hand84 (77.1 %)
Face30 (27.5 %)
Calf23 (21.1 %)
Foot17 (15.6 %)
Back9 (8.2 %)
Forearm9 (8.2 %)
Abdomen8 (8.7 %)
Knee7 (7.6 %)
Thorax7 (7.6 %)
Arm6 (6.5 %)
Body6 (6.5 %)
Anatomic sites of involvement in order of frequency Results of patch test reading on day 2 and re-evaluation on day 3 (72 h) with regard to one or more reaction to allergens or negative or doubtful results in male and female patients are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

The overall positive, doubtful and negative responses to patch test allergens among male and female patients

GenderPositivePercentNegativePercentDoubtfulPercent
Male (N = 37)1232.41232.41335.2
Female (N = 72)3954.22534.7811.1
Total (N = 109)5146.83733.92119.3
The overall positive, doubtful and negative responses to patch test allergens among male and female patients Females were significantly more likely to show a positive response to at least one allergen (p-value = 0.031, odds ratio: 2.46, 95 %, and confidence interval (CI): 1.07–5.64). We found no significant difference in the frequency of positive patch test responses among patients with and without personal or family history of atopy (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of reactions to allergens (at least one positive or negative reaction) in patients with or without personal or family history of atopy

TotalReaction to allergens p-value
Positive (one or more reactions)Negative
personal history of atopy+4826 (54.2 %)22 (45.8 %)0.171
-6125 (41.0 %)36 (59.0 %)
family history of atopy+4123 (56.1 %)18 (43.9 %)0.130
-6828 (41.2 %)40 (58.8 %)
Comparison of reactions to allergens (at least one positive or negative reaction) in patients with or without personal or family history of atopy The overall results of patch test reading on day 2 and re-evaluation on day 3 based on gender are shown in Table 4. The ten most common inciting allergen in our series were nickel sulfate (21,19.3 %), cobalt chloride (11,10.1 %), methylisothiazolinone (7,6.4 %), colophony (6,5.5 %), potassium dichromate (5,4.6 %), paraben mix (4,3.7 %), 4-tert-butylphenon (4,3.7 %), fragrance mix (4,3.7 %), thiuram mix (3,2.8 %), mercapto mix (3,2.8 %), 4-phenylendiamine base (2,1.8 %), and formaldehyde (2,1.8 %) (Additional file 2).
Table 4

Positive response to allergens of the European standard series in Iranian children with allergic contact dermatitis

SubstanceConcentration (%)Total (N = 109)PercentMale (N = 37)PercentFemale (N = 72)Percent P-Value Relevance
Nickel sulfate52119.3410.81723.60.13011 (52.3 %)
Cobalt chloride11110.1513.568.30.5044 (36.4 %)
Methylisothiazolinone0.0576.412.768.30.419NA
Colophony2065.512.756.90.662NA
Potassium dichromate0.554.638.122.80.334NA
Paraben mix1643.725.422.80.603NA
4-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin143.700.045.60.297NA
Fragrance mix843.712.734.21.000NA
Thiuram mix132.812.722.81.000NA
Mercapto mix132.800.034.20.550NA
4-Phenylenediamine base121.800.022.80.547NA
Formaldehyde121.812.711.41.000NA
N-isopropyl-N-phenyl-4-phenylenediamine0.121.812.711.41.000NA
Wool Alcohol3021.800.022.80.547NA
Sesquiterpene lactone mix0.121.825.400.00.113NA
Benzocaine521.800.022.80.547NA
Cliquinol510.912.700.00.339NA
Balsam of peru2510.900.011.41.000NA
Epoxy resin110.900.011.41.000NA
Quaterium-15110.900.011.41.000NA
Mercaptobenzothiazole210.912.700.00.339NA
Neomycin sulphate2010.900.011.41.000NA
Hydroxyl-methyl-penthyl-cyclo-carboxaldehyde510.912.700.00.339NA
Primin0.0100.000.000.0NANA
Positive response to allergens of the European standard series in Iranian children with allergic contact dermatitis Positive allergic reaction to nickel was more common in females than in males, however, without statistical significance (23.6 % vs. 10.8 %, p-value = 0.130) (Table 4). We could only assess the clinical and practical relevance in the two most important allergens (nickel and cobalt), and we observed clinical current relevance in 11 (52.3 %) and 4 (36.4 %) for nickel and cobalt, respectively. Results of patch test reading according to age groups are shown in Table 5.
Table 5

The positive patch test responses according to the inciting allergen and age group (0–10, 11–8 years)

Substance0–10 (N = 22)Percent11–18 (N = 87)Percent P-Value
Nickel sulfate313.61820.70.55
Cobalt chloride418.278.00.22
Methylisothiazolinone29.155.70.62
Colophony14.555.71.0
Potassium dichromate00.055.70.58
Paraben mix29.122.30.17
4-tert-butylphenon00.044.60.58
Fragrance mix14.533.41.0
Thiuram mix00.033.41.0
Mercapto mix00.033.41.0
Phenylendiamine base00.022.31.0
Formaldehyde00.022.31.0
N-isopropyl-N-phenyl-4-phenylenediamine00.022.31.0
Wool Alcohol00.022.31.0
Sesquiterpene lactone mix00.022.31.0
Benzocaine00.022.31.0
Cliquinol00.011.11.0
Balsam of peru00.011.11.0
Epoxy resin00.011.11.0
Quaterium-1800.011.11.0
Mercaptobenzothiazole00.011.11.0
Neomycin sulphate00.011.11.0
Hydroxyl-methyl-penthyl-cyclo-carboxaldehyde00.011.11.0
Primin00.000.0NA
The positive patch test responses according to the inciting allergen and age group (0–10, 11–8 years) For most allergens (except cobalt chloride, methylisothiazolinone, paraben mix, and fragrance mix), the percentages of positive response in the older age group (11–18 years) were higher than children below 10 years. The most common allergen in the younger age group were cobalt chloride (4, 18.2 %), nickel sulfate (3, 13.6 %), methylisothiazolinone (2, 9.1 %), and paraben mix (2, 9.1 %) while in the older group they were as follows: nickel sulfate, cobalt chloride, methylisothiazolinone, colophony, potassium dichromate.

Discussion

In this study we have identified the inciting allergen according to patch tests in 109 children with ACD. Contact dermatitis in children has been studied less extensively than adults in the existing literature [10, 11]. In the current study, overall 48.6 % of patients had one or more positive patch test results. The positive response rate to patch test allergens ranges from 15 to 62.3 % in different studies [5, 12, 13]. Nickel was the most common allergen in our study, a common finding with most previous reports [10, 14, 15]. Although some authors have reported the rate of false-positive and irritant reactions to nickel is higher among children [16], other studies suggest that this high rate might be due to use of adult concentration of allergen for patch testing [17], and the recent series do not confirm this [6]. We could not demonstrate clinical relevance in about half of the cases in our study. In our series nickel sulfate, cobalt chloride, methylisothiazolinone, colophony, potassium dichromate, paraben mix, 4-tert-butylphenon, fragrance mix, thiuram mix, mercapto mix, phenylendiamine base, and formaldehyde were the most common allergens in decreasing order of frequency. The most commonly reported allergens in a study in Singapore were Nickel (40 %), Thimerosal (15 %), Colophony (9 %), Lanolin (8 %), Cobalt (8 %), Fragrance mix (5 %), and Neomycin (4 %) [18]. While in another study in Turkey, the most commonly documented inciting allergens were Nickel sulfate (46 %), Cobalt chloride (9.5 %), p-Phenylenediamine (9.5 %), Neomycin sulfate 20 % (7 %), Formaldehyde 1 % (4.6 %), Fragrance mix 8 % (3.9 %), CL-methylisothiazolinone 0.01 % (3.1 %), Mercapto mix 2 % (3.1 %), Quaternium 15 % (2.3 %), Benzocaine 5 % (2.3 %), and Potassium dichromate 0.5 % (1.5 %) [19]. In a recent review of five pediatric patch test studies to, the top ten allergens were neomycin, balsam of Peru, fragrance mix, lanolin, cocamidopropylbetaine, formaldehyde, corticosteroids, methylchlorisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, propylene glycol, and benzalkonium chloride [6]. The observed differences in the frequency of the allergens responsible for induction of ACD between the present study and other studies may be explained by a variety of reasons. First and foremost, the prevalence of sensitivity to an individual allergen depends not only on the intrinsic allergenicity of the compound but also on the level of allergen exposure to the population, which may vary from country to country [20-23]. Another important issue is that investigators often employ a variety of test panels and allergen concentrations in different studies, therefore rendering comparisons difficult [23]. There are disagreements as to whether there is seasonal and temporal variation in reactivity to allergens [24]. Moreover, reactivity to some allergens may be influenced by ethnic factors [25]. Gender differences in rates of reactions to a variety of contact allergens have been previously reported [2, 5]. In our study females were significantly more likely to have positive tests. This finding is consistent with previously published studies [5, 12, 15]. Nevertheless, in one study no difference between sex and reactivity to the applied allergens was observed [26]. In the current study, nickel sensitivity was also found to be more frequent in females; however, without statistical significance (Table 4). Ear piercing has been considered as the most common cause of nickel sensitization and the reason for its higher rate in females, with the risk of nickel allergy rising with the number of piercings [12]. Piercing is a common tradition in Iran and is usually performed in girls early in life often followed by long term wearing of golden earing to keep the hole open. Low-carat gold may contain nickel [19] In contrast to studies reporting more potassium dichromate reactivity in adult males, we found no male predominance for this allergen [27, 28]. As previously reported, co-reactivity between cobalt and nickel allergy was observed in our study [2, 18]. We found that in 45.5 % of patients with positive cobalt responses nickel reactivity was also present, while 23.8 % of patients with positive patch tests to nickel also had positive reaction to cobalt. In agreement with our results, Rystedt reported that nickel sensitivity predisposed the patients to cobalt sensitivity [29]. Our results showed that older children tend to show more positive reactions to allergens. This finding is in concordance with a pervious study that showed the rate of patch test positivity was higher in older age groups [12]. Moreover, it should be taken into account that contact dermatitis increases with age and is more common in older individuals [30]. However, according to some researchers an age-dependent decrease in delayed type hypersensitivity may occur with age [30]. In the present study 44.0 % of patients had a personal history of atopy. The relationship between atopy and ACD remains controversial [31, 32]. Although it has been assumed that atopy could be a predisposing factor for the development of ACD, and more reactivity to specific allergens have been reported in atopic patient [33-35]; we found no significant association between personal or family history of atopy and patch test results. In concordance with our findings, some studies indicate that there is a similar prevalence of ACD in individuals with and without atopic diathesis [31, 36]. Hands were the most frequent sites of ACD in our study. Metal preservative and rubber are the most common causes for ACD of this region [11]. Also, in our study metal was the most common causative allergens of ACD. In the present study, the face was the second most frequent ACD anatomic site. In some studies, the face was the most common site of ACD in children and adolescents [11]. Positive clinical relevance of the positive reactions was considered if the patient described a current or past cutaneous exposure to a product known to contain the allergen to which the patient reacted [7]. For some allergens in the pediatric patient group evaluation of relevance was not possible due to unknown history of exposure. Methylisothiazolinone is a common preservative found in many cosmetic and toiletry products marketed to both children and adults. It is increasingly known to cause ACD, especially in perioral and perineal regions due to facial or baby wipes [37]. Colophony is a cause of ACD to adhesives and tapes. However, the clinical relevance of a positive patch-test reaction to colophony is often difficult to evaluate [38]. Our study is limited by small sample size, also we were unable to evaluate the relevance for positive patch test for all antigens. Studies with greater sample size and with adequate antigen relevance determination is recommended in Iranian children with ACD.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that nickel sulfate, cobalt, methylisothiazolinone, and colophony are the most common allergens responsible for induction of allergic contact dermatitis in Iranian children and adolescents. Females tend to show more positive reactions to allergens. These findings are crucial in the treatment, long term management, and proper education of children with allergic contact dermatitis.

Abbreviation

ACD, allergic contact dermatitis
  35 in total

Review 1.  The utility of patch testing children with atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  R B Vender
Journal:  Skin Therapy Lett       Date:  2002-06

Review 2.  Pediatric Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Lessons for Better Care.

Authors:  Alina Goldenberg; Nanette Silverberg; Jonathan I Silverberg; James Treat; Sharon E Jacob
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

3.  The effect of race and ethnicity on patch test results.

Authors:  Vincent A Deleo; Susan C Taylor; Donald V Belsito; Joseph F Fowler; Anthony F Fransway; Howard I Maibach; James G Marks; C G Toby Mathias; James R Nethercott; Melanie D Pratt; Robert R Reitschel; Elizabeth F Sherertz; Frances J Storrs; James S Taylor
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice.

Authors:  Jeanne D Johansen; Kristiina Aalto-Korte; Tove Agner; Klaus E Andersen; Andreas Bircher; Magnus Bruze; Alicia Cannavó; Ana Giménez-Arnau; Margarida Gonçalo; An Goossens; Swen M John; Carola Lidén; Magnus Lindberg; Vera Mahler; Mihály Matura; Thomas Rustemeyer; Jørgen Serup; Radoslaw Spiewak; Jacob P Thyssen; Martine Vigan; Ian R White; Mark Wilkinson; Wolfgang Uter
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Seasonal influence on patch test results in central Europe.

Authors:  B Kranke; W Aberer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Patch testing in children and adolescents: five years' experience and follow-up.

Authors:  M Shah; F M Lewis; D J Gawkrodger
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Usefulness of the European standard series for patch testing in children. A 3-year single-centre study of 337 patients.

Authors:  S Roul; G Ducombs; A Taieb
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 8.  Allergic contact dermatitis in children and adolescents.

Authors:  C G Mortz; K E Andersen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Dana Malajian; Donald V Belsito
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Relationship between nickel and cobalt sensitization in hard metal workers.

Authors:  I Rystedt; T Fischer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.600

View more
  4 in total

1.  Contact allergen sensitivity in children with contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Esra Yücel; Deniz Özçeker
Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-01

Review 2.  Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Wolfgang Uter; Thomas Werfel; Ian R White; Jeanne D Johansen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA): Contact allergies in relation to body sites in patients with allergic contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Jart A F Oosterhaven; Wolfgang Uter; Werner Aberer; José C Armario-Hita; Barbara K Ballmer-Weber; Andrea Bauer; Magdalena Czarnecka-Operacz; Peter Elsner; Juan García-Gavín; Ana M Giménez-Arnau; Swen M John; Beata Kręcisz; Vera Mahler; Thomas Rustemeyer; Anna Sadowska-Przytocka; Javier Sánchez-Pérez; Dagmar Simon; Skaidra Valiukevičienė; Elke Weisshaar; Marie L A Schuttelaar
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Patch test results in paediatric patients with atopic dermatitis in Laos.

Authors:  Catriona I Wootton; Mong K Sodaly; Somxay X Billamay; John S C English; Mayxay Mayfong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.