Literature DB >> 27404985

Mental Numerosity Line in the Human's Approximate Number System.

Xinlin Zhou1,2, Chaoran Shen1,2, Leinian Li1,2, Dawei Li3, Jiaxin Cui1,2.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated existence of a mental line for symbolic numbers (e.g., Arabic digits). For nonsymbolic number systems, however, it remains unresolved whether a spontaneous spatial layout of numerosity exists. The current experiment investigated whether SNARC-like (Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes) effects exist in approximate processing of numerosity, as well as of size and density. Participants were asked to judge whether two serially presented stimuli (i.e., dot arrays, pentagons) were the same regarding numbers of dots, sizes of the pentagon, or densities of dots. Importantly, two confounds that were overlooked by most previous studies were controlled in this study: no ordered numerosity was presented, and only numerosity in the approximate number system (beyond the subitizing range) was used. The results demonstrated that there was a SNARC-like effect only in the numerosity-matching task. The results suggest that numerosity could be spontaneously aligned to a left-to-right oriented mental line according to magnitude information in human's approximate number system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SNARC effect; mathematical cognition; mental number line; numerical processing; numerosity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27404985     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  5 in total

1.  Non-symbolic and symbolic number lines are dissociated.

Authors:  Xingcheng He; Pengpeng Guo; Shuyi Li; Xiaojing Shen; Xinlin Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.

Authors:  Dominique Lopiccolo; Charles B Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Spatial frequency equalization does not prevent spatial-numerical associations.

Authors:  Luca Rinaldi; Luisa Girelli; Andrea Adriano
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-02-07

4.  Non-symbolic magnitudes are represented spatially: Evidence from a non-symbolic SNARC task.

Authors:  Fiona Nemeh; Judi Humberstone; Mark J Yates; Robert A Reeve
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Perceiving numerosity does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.

Authors:  Michele Pellegrino; Mario Pinto; Fabio Marson; Stefano Lasaponara; Fabrizio Doricchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.