| Literature DB >> 27404455 |
Federico Rojo1, Abel González-Pérez2, Jessica Furriol3, Ma Jesús Nicolau4, Jaime Ferrer3, Octavio Burgués5, MohammadA Sabbaghi6,7, Irene González-Navarrete6, Ion Cristobal1, Laia Serrano6, Sandra Zazo1, Juan Madoz1, Sonia Servitja6,7, Ignasi Tusquets6,7, Joan Albanell6,7,8, Ana Lluch3,9, Ana Rovira6,7, Pilar Eroles3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: NF-κB signalling appears deregulated in breast tumours. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the non-canonical NF-κB pathway, is activated in oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer, to identify any correlation between its activity and the clinico-pathological phenotype and to explore whether NF-κB2 and RelB subunits and/or any of their target genes might be used as a predictive marker.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27404455 PMCID: PMC4973161 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Characteristics of patients in training cohort
| Age (median, range) | 56.72 (30–86) | |
| Histology type | ||
| Ductal | 100 | 73.53 |
| Lobular | 12 | 8.82 |
| Others | 15 | 11.03 |
| ND | 9 | 6.62 |
| Tumour grade | ||
| I | 7 | 5.15 |
| II | 74 | 54.41 |
| III | 36 | 26.47 |
| IV | 9 | 6.62 |
| ND | 10 | 7.35 |
| Tumour size | ||
| T0 | 1 | 0.74 |
| T1 | 19 | 13.97 |
| T2 | 65 | 47.79 |
| T3 | 17 | 12.50 |
| T4 | 27 | 19.85 |
| ND | 7 | 5.15 |
| Lymph nodes | ||
| N0 | 37 | 27.21 |
| N1 | 90 | 66.18 |
| N2 | 3 | 2.21 |
| ND | 6 | 4.41 |
| ER status | ||
| + | 121 | 88.97 |
| − | 15 | 11.03 |
| PGR status | ||
| + | 111 | 81.62 |
| − | 25 | 18.38 |
| HER2 status | ||
| + | 11 | 8.09 |
| − | 72 | 52.94 |
| ND | 53 | 38.97 |
| Menopausal status | ||
| Post | 79 | 58.09 |
| Pre | 36 | 26.47 |
| Peri | 4 | 2.94 |
| ND | 17 | 12.50 |
| Treatment | ||
| Anthracyclines | 47 | 34.56 |
| Tamoxifen | 19 | 13.97 |
| Others | 2 | 1.47 |
| ND | 68 | 50.00 |
Abbreviations: ND=not determined; peri=perimenopausal; post=postmenopausal; pre=premenopausal.
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded validation cohort
| Age (median, range) | 57 (26–90) | |
| Menopausal status | ||
| Premenopausal | 63 | 30.4 |
| Postmenopausal | 144 | 69.6 |
| Tumour size (mm) | ||
| ⩽20 | 127 | 61.4 |
| 21–50 | 65 | 31.4 |
| >50 | 15 | 7.2 |
| Tumour grade | ||
| I | 42 | 20.3 |
| II | 107 | 51.7 |
| III | 58 | 28.0 |
| Lymph nodes | ||
| None | 126 | 60.9 |
| 1–3 | 52 | 25.1 |
| 4–9 | 17 | 8.2 |
| >9 | 12 | 5.8 |
| Histology | ||
| Ductal | 189 | 91.3 |
| Lobular | 17 | 8.2 |
| Others | 1 | 0.5 |
| Progesterone receptor status | ||
| Negative | 31 | 14.9 |
| Positive | 176 | 85.1 |
| Proliferation (Ki-67) | ||
| Low proliferation (<20%) | 168 | 81.1 |
| High proliferation (⩾20%) | 39 | 18.9 |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | ||
| No | 45 | 21.7 |
| Yes | 162 | 78.3 |
| Hormonotherapy | ||
| No | 12 | 5.8 |
| Yes | 195 | 94.2 |
| Relapse | ||
| No | 180 | 86.9 |
| Yes | 27 | 13.1 |
Figure 1Expression of NF- ER+ tumours are divided according to quartiles of expression of ESR1. The Y-axis shows arbitrary units.
Figure 2DNA-binding activity (activation) of NF- NF-κB DNA binding for the two NF-κB family members was evaluated using the ELISA-based TransAM NF-κB Family kit (Active Motif). The read absorbance at 450 nm of lysis buffer added with the NF-κB antibody dilution was used as blank to normalise the samples measure.
Figure 3Immunohistochemical staining for nuclear NF- (A) Representative image of breast cancer tissue sections with immunohistochemistry staining for RelB and NF-κB2 proteins. Breast cancer cells evidence intense nuclear immunoreactivity for both NF-κB family members. Images of random fields were taken at a magnification of × 100. Scale bars, 25 μm. (B) Representative image of co-localisation RelB, and NF-κB2 proteins by immunofluorescence. Sections were stained with antibodies against RelB (red) and NF-κB2 (green); nuclei were visualised with DAPI (blue). Merged frames indicate co-localisation (yellow). Scale bars, 25 μm. (C) Expression of NF-κB2 and RelB protein in ER+ breast tumours according to expression levels of the receptor (P<0.001). (D) Multiplexing immunofluorescence for ER and NF-κB2, and for ER and RelB in sequential tissue sections. Scale bars, 25 μm.
Figure 4DFS and OS curves for the NF- The Kaplan–Meier method was utilised to construct curves for DFS and OS according to the nuclear expression of each subunit (A) and the co-expression (B).
Figure 5DFS curve of RE+ breast patients according to the expression of dn=downregulated; up=upregulated.