Farnia Feiz1, Reyhane Sedghi1, Alireza Salehi2, Nahid Hatam3, Jamshid Bahmei3, Afshin Borhani-Haghighi4. 1. Clinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; These authors contributed equally to this work. 2. Research Center for Traditional Medicine and History of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 3. School of Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 4. Clinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation with adjusted dose warfarin is a well-accepted treatment for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Meanwhile, using bridging therapy with heparin or heparinoids before warfarin for initiation of anticoagulation is a matter of debate. We compared safety, efficacy, and tolerability of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) as a bridging method in patients with recent ischemic stroke due to atrial fibrillation. METHOD: This study was a randomized single-blind controlled trial in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to atrial fibrillation who were eligible for receivingwarfarin and were randomly treated with 60 milligrams (mg) of LMWH (enoxaparin) subcutaneously every 12 h, or 1000 units/h of continuous intravenous heparin. The primary efficacy endpoints were recurrence of new ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and/or death. The primary safety endpoint was central nervous system and/or systemic bleeding. RESULTS:Seventy-four subjects were recruited. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of two groups were matched. Composite endpoint outcome of new ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and/or death in follow-up period was seen in 10 subjects (27.03%) in UFH group and in four subjects (10.81%) in LMWH group (p value: 0.136). All hemorrhages and symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhages in follow-up period were in 7 (18.9%) and 4 (10.8%) patients in UFH group, in 5 (13.5%), and 3 (8.1%) patients in LMWH group (p values: 0.754 and 0.751), respectively. Drop out and major adverse-effects such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and drug hypersensitivity were not seen in any patient. CONCLUSION:Enoxaparin can be a safe and efficient alternative for UFH as bridging therapy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation with adjusted dose warfarin is a well-accepted treatment for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Meanwhile, using bridging therapy with heparin or heparinoids before warfarin for initiation of anticoagulation is a matter of debate. We compared safety, efficacy, and tolerability of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) as a bridging method in patients with recent ischemic stroke due to atrial fibrillation. METHOD: This study was a randomized single-blind controlled trial in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to atrial fibrillation who were eligible for receiving warfarin and were randomly treated with 60 milligrams (mg) of LMWH (enoxaparin) subcutaneously every 12 h, or 1000 units/h of continuous intravenous heparin. The primary efficacy endpoints were recurrence of new ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and/or death. The primary safety endpoint was central nervous system and/or systemic bleeding. RESULTS: Seventy-four subjects were recruited. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of two groups were matched. Composite endpoint outcome of new ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and/or death in follow-up period was seen in 10 subjects (27.03%) in UFH group and in four subjects (10.81%) in LMWH group (p value: 0.136). All hemorrhages and symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhages in follow-up period were in 7 (18.9%) and 4 (10.8%) patients in UFH group, in 5 (13.5%), and 3 (8.1%) patients in LMWH group (p values: 0.754 and 0.751), respectively. Drop out and major adverse-effects such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and drug hypersensitivity were not seen in any patient. CONCLUSION:Enoxaparin can be a safe and efficient alternative for UFH as bridging therapy.
Authors: J B Segal; R L McNamara; M R Miller; N Kim; S N Goodman; N R Powe; K A Robinson; E B Bass Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Daniel E Singer; Gregory W Albers; James E Dalen; Margaret C Fang; Alan S Go; Jonathan L Halperin; Gregory Y H Lip; Warren J Manning Journal: Chest Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: James J Ferguson; Robert M Califf; Elliott M Antman; Marc Cohen; Cindy L Grines; Shaun Goodman; Dean J Kereiakes; Anatoly Langer; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Christopher C Nessel; Paul W Armstrong; Alvaro Avezum; Phil Aylward; Richard C Becker; Luigi Biasucci; Steven Borzak; Jacques Col; Marty J Frey; Ed Fry; Dietrich C Gulba; Sema Guneri; Enrique Gurfinkel; Robert Harrington; Judith S Hochman; Neal S Kleiman; Martin B Leon; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Carl J Pepine; Witold Ruzyllo; Steven R Steinhubl; Paul S Teirstein; Luis Toro-Figueroa; Harvey White Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-07-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: R C Tait; I D Walker; P H Reitsma; S I Islam; F McCall; S R Poort; J A Conkie; R M Bertina Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 1995-01 Impact factor: 5.249