| Literature DB >> 27403201 |
Song-Yi Kim1, Seorim Min2, Hyangsook Lee1, Soyeon Cheon1, Xiuyu Zhang2, Ji-Yeun Park3, Taek-Jin Song4, Hi-Joon Park1.
Abstract
Objectives. This systematic review aimed to summarize and evaluate the findings of studies investigating the local microcirculatory effects following acupuncture stimulation. Methods. MEDLINE, EMBASE, OASIS, and Cochrane library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before January 30, 2015. Studies demonstrating any type of microcirculation response to manual acupuncture in healthy subjects and patients were included. The risk of bias and the reliability of the experimental conditions were evaluated to determine quality assessment. Results. Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria; there was at least one acupuncture-induced change in a microcirculatory parameter. Of the seven studies in healthy subjects, four reported significant increases in blood flow following acupuncture compared with control, whereas one other study observed reductions in microcirculation immediately after acupuncture needling. The studies that assessed patients with either fibromyalgia or trapezius myalgia found significant increases in blood flow in the skin and muscle. Additionally, the degree and duration of increases in microcirculation varied depending on the condition of the subjects and the manipulation technique. Conclusions. The current evidence regarding the local effects of acupuncture in terms of blood flow remains insufficient for reliable conclusions due to few well-designed studies. Additional well-designed studies are needed to clarify these issues.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27403201 PMCID: PMC4923553 DOI: 10.1155/2016/9874207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Flowchart.
Summary of the included studies.
| Author (year) country | Study design | Population (number participants) | Group | Outcome measurement | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture (depth, manipulation, deqi) | Control | Device | Outcome | Measurement site | Measurement time | |||
| Min et al. (2015) | RCT, cross-over | HS (12) | LI4 (15 mm depth, manipulation with deqi, three repeated manipulations) | Insertion-only: same acupoint as EXP | LDPI | Ratio of relative changes in perfusiona | LI4 | Before, |
|
| ||||||||
| Huang et al. (2012) | RCT, cross-over | HS (29) | PC6 (manipulation with deqi) | (A) Superficial needing: same acupoint as EXP without manipulation | LDPI | Ratio of relative changes in perfusiona | (A) Meridian (PC6–PC3) | Before, |
|
| ||||||||
| Zhang et al. (2008) | RCT, cross-over | HS (20) | LI4 (manipulation with deqi) | Nonacupoint: nearby LI4 | LDPI | Relative change rates | (A) LI4 | Before, |
|
| ||||||||
| Tsuchiya et al. (2007) | RCT, cross-over | HS (20) | LI4, PC6, PC8, LU6, HT7 (5~8 mm depth, manipulation with deqi) | Nonpenetrating control: same acupoints as EXP (empty tube) | Laser tissue-blood flow meter | Skin blood flow (mL/min/100 g of tissue) | Center of the palm | Before, |
|
| ||||||||
| Sandberg et al. (2005) | RCT, cross-over | HS, patients (fibromyalgia, trapezius myalgia) (44) | GB21 (~10 mm depth, with deqi) | (A) Superficial needing: same acupoint as EXP without manipulation | PPG | Relative changes in skin and muscle blood flow (%) | Trapezius and supraspinatus muscle and skin | Before, |
|
| ||||||||
| Sandberg et al. (2004) | RCT, cross-over | Patients (fibromyalgia) (15) | ST36 (~20 mm depth, manipulation with deep sensation) | (A) Superficial needing: same acupoint as EXP (~2-3 mm depth) | PPG | Relative changes in skin and muscle blood flow (%) | Around the ST36 (tibialis anterior muscle and skin) | Before, |
|
| ||||||||
| Sandberg et al. (2003) | RCT, cross-over | HS (14) | ST36 (~20 mm depth, with deqi) | (A) Insertion-only: same acupoint as EXP (~20 mm depth, without deqi) | PPG | Relative changes in skin and muscle blood flow (%) | Around the ST36 (tibialis anterior muscle and skin) | Before, |
|
| ||||||||
| Litscher et al. (2002) | RCT, cross-over | HS (51) | PC6 (5 mm depth, with deqi, no manipulation) | Nonacupoint: lateral from the radius 3 cm above the carpal fold | LDPI | Mean perfusion (volt) | Middle fingertip | Before, |
aNormalised data to remove the influence of the whole effect.
EXP, experimental group; HS, healthy subjects; LDPI, laser Doppler perfusion imaging; min, minutes; PPG, photoplethysmography; RCT, randomized controlled trials.
Skin blood flow results of comparison between groups.
| Author (year) | Immediately after acupuncture insertion or manipulation | During acupuncture | After acupuncture withdrawal | Follow-up | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (within 1 min) | (within 5 min) | ||||
| Acupuncture versus no-acupuncture | |||||
| Sandberg et al. (2005) [ | HS: | HS: | HS: | HS: NS | |
| Sandberg et al. (2004) [ | FM: | FM: | — | — | |
| Sandberg et al. (2003) [ |
| NS | — | — | |
|
| |||||
| Acupuncture versus nonpenetrating acupuncture (same acupoint) | |||||
| Huang et al. (2012) [ | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Tsuchiya et al. (2007) [ | — | — | — |
|
|
|
| |||||
| Acupuncture versus superficial acupuncture | |||||
| Huang et al. (2012) [ | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Sandberg et al. (2005) [ | — | HS: NS | HS: | HS: | HS: NS |
| Sandberg et al. (2004) [ | — | FM: | FM: | — | — |
| Sandberg et al. (2003) [ | — |
| NS | — | — |
|
| |||||
| Acupoint versus nonacupoint | |||||
| Huang et al. (2012) [ | — | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Zhang et al. (2008) [ | — | NS | NS | NS | — |
| Litscher et al. (2002) [ |
| — | NS | — | — |
|
| |||||
| Acupuncture with manipulation versus insertion-only | |||||
| Min et al. (2015) [ | — | — |
| NS | — |
| Sandberg et al. (2003) [ | — |
| NS | — | — |
Superficial acupuncture had greater increase of skin blood flow than deep acupuncture; FM, fibromyalgia patients; HS, healthy subjects; NS, not significantly different; TM, trapezius myalgia patients. Most statistically significant values indicate the increase of blood flow compared to the control. “↑” means increase of blood flow compared to the control. “↓” means decrease of blood flow compared to the control. “—” means “not reported” or “not applicable.”
Muscle blood flow results of comparison between groups.
| Author (year) | Immediately after acupuncture insertion or manipulation | During acupuncture | After acupuncture withdrawal | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture versus no-acupuncture | ||||
| Sandberg et al. (2005) [ | HS: | HS: | HS: | HS: NS |
| Sandberg et al. (2004) [ | FM: | FM: | — | — |
| Sandberg et al. (2003) [ |
|
| — | — |
|
| ||||
| Acupuncture versus superficial acupuncture | ||||
| Sandberg et al. (2005) [ | HS: NS | HS: | HS: | HS: NS |
| Sandberg et al. (2004) [ | FM: | FM: | — | — |
| Sandberg et al. (2003) [ |
|
| — | — |
|
| ||||
| Acupuncture with manipulation versus insertion-only | ||||
| Sandberg et al. (2003) [ |
|
| — | — |
Superficial acupuncture had greater increase of blood flow than deep acupuncture; FM, fibromyalgia patients; HS, healthy subjects; NS, not significantly different; TM, trapezius myalgia patients. “↑” means increase of blood flow compared to the control. “—” means “not reported” or “not applicable.”
Methodological quality of the included studies.
| Author (year) | Selection | Performance | Detection | Attrition | Reporting | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| Min et al. (2015) [ | Y | ? | ? | Y | Y | Y |
| Huang et al. (2012) [ | Y | ? | Y | Y | Y | N |
| Zhang et al. (2008) [ | ? | ? | ? | Y | Y | Y |
| Tsuchiya et al. (2007) [ | ? | ? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Sandberg et al. (2005) [ | ? | ? | ?/Na | Y | Y | Y |
| Sandberg et al. (2004) [ | ? | ? | ?/Na | Y | Y | Y |
| Sandberg et al. (2003) [ | ?/Na | ? | ?/Na | Y | Y | Y |
| Litscher et al. (2002) [ | ? | ? | ? | Y | Y | Y |
Items for RCT: 1, adequate sequence generation; 2, adequate allocation concealment; 3, blinding of participants and research personnel; 4, blinding of outcome assessments; 5, adequate consideration of incomplete outcome data; 6, free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting [21].
N, no (high risk of bias); ?, unclear (lack of information); Y, yes (low risk of bias).
aOther control groups/no-acupuncture group.
Checklist for study characteristics and experimental environments.
| Author (year) | Design | Participants characteristics | Measurement accuracy | Experiment environment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
| Min et al. (2015) [ | Y | Y | Y | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | — | Y | Y |
| Huang et al. (2012) [ | — | Y | Y | — | — | Y | Y | — | Y | Y | — | NA |
| Zhang et al. (2008) [ | Y | Y | Y | — | — | — | — | — | Y | — | — | NA |
| Tsuchiya et al. (2007) [ | Y | Y | — | Y | — | — | — | Y | — | — | — | NA |
| Sandberg et al. (2005) [ | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | — | Y | Y | — | Y | Y |
| Sandberg et al. (2004) [ | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | — | Y | Y | Y | — | Y | Y |
| Sandberg et al. (2003) [ | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | — | Y | Y | Y | — | Y | Y |
| Litscher et al. (2002) [ | Y | Y | Y | — | Y | — | Y | Y | — | — | — | NA |
Items: 1, for cross-over design, washout time considered; 2, description of participants' age; 3, description of participants' gender; 4, description of participants' experience for acupuncture; 5, description of posture during measurement; 6, description of movement control; 7, description of details of rest before measurement; 8, description of restriction before experiment; 9, description of temperature control; 10, description of humidity control; 11, description of light control; 12, others. NA, not applicable; Y, item described; —, not reported.