| Literature DB >> 27403200 |
Oluwafemi O Oguntibeju1, Samantha Meyer2, Yapo G Aboua3, Mediline Goboza1.
Abstract
Background. Hypoxis hemerocallidea is a native plant that grows in the Southern African regions and is well known for its beneficial medicinal effects in the treatment of diabetes, cancer, and high blood pressure. Aim. This study evaluated the effects of Hypoxis hemerocallidea on oxidative stress biomarkers, hepatic injury, and other selected biomarkers in the liver and kidneys of healthy nondiabetic and streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced diabetic male Wistar rats. Materials and Methods. Rats were injected intraperitoneally with 50 mg/kg of STZ to induce diabetes. The plant extract-Hypoxis hemerocallidea (200 mg/kg or 800 mg/kg) aqueous solution was administered (daily) orally for 6 weeks. Antioxidant activities were analysed using a Multiskan Spectrum plate reader while other serum biomarkers were measured using the RANDOX chemistry analyser. Results. Both dosages (200 mg/kg and 800 mg/kg) of Hypoxis hemerocallidea significantly reduced the blood glucose levels in STZ-induced diabetic groups. Activities of liver enzymes were increased in the diabetic control and in the diabetic group treated with 800 mg/kg, whereas the 200 mg/kg dosage ameliorated hepatic injury. In the hepatic tissue, the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), catalase, and total glutathione were reduced in the diabetic control group. However treatment with both doses improved the antioxidant status. The FRAP and the catalase activities in the kidney were elevated in the STZ-induced diabetic group treated with 800 mg/kg of the extract possibly due to compensatory responses. Conclusion. Hypoxis hemerocallidea demonstrated antihyperglycemic and antioxidant effects especially in the liver tissue.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27403200 PMCID: PMC4925985 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8934362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Chemical structures of norlignans derived from hypoxide (1–6) (adapted from Laporta et al. [22]).
The effect of H. hemerocallidea on glucose concentrations.
| Groups | Glucose reading after STZ induction (mmol/L) | Final glucose reading after 6 weeks (mmol/L) | Percentage change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 6.23 | 5.31 | 1.47 |
| Group 2 | 29.54 | 24.73 | 1.62 |
| Group 3 | 25.27 | 6.74 | 73.3 |
| Group 4 | 24.53 | 10.17 | 58.54 |
| Group 5 | 6.25 | 5.07 | 1.89 |
Group 1: normal control; group 2: diabetic control; group 3: diabetic group fed with 800 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; group 4: diabetic group fed with 200 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; group 5: normal controls (nondiabetic) fed with 800 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea.
Effect of H. hemerocallidea on total body weight and relative weights of kidney and liver tissues.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total body weight (g) | 303.8 ± 23.7 | 214.7 ± 25.5ae | 229.2 ± 44.9ae | 231.2 ± 35.6ae | 302.9 ± 25.1 |
| Kidney weight (g) | 1.99 ± 0.05 | 2.51 ± 0.09 | 2.34 ± 0.09 | 2.22 ± 0.09 | 1.93 ± 0.05 |
| Relative kidney weight (g) | 0.66 ± 0.02 | 1.17 ± 0.05a | 1.02 ± 0.01a | 0.96 ± 0.02a | 0.63 ± 0.01bcd |
| Liver weight (g) | 10.47 ± 0.41 | 10.15 ± 0.42 | 9.89 ± 0.50 | 9.11 ± 0.33 | 10.13 ± 0.29 |
| Relative liver weight (g/100 g) | 3.45 ± 0.01 | 4.72 ± 0.02a | 4.31 ± 0.05a | 3.94 ± 0.02 | 3.34 ± 0.01bc |
Group 1: normal control; group 2: diabetic control; group 3: diabetic group fed with 800 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; group 4: diabetic group fed with 200 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; group 5: normal controls (nondiabetic) fed with 800 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; a represents a significant difference when compared to group 1 control at P < 0.05; b indicates significant difference of groups when compared to group 2 at P < 0.05; c represents a significant differences of values in groups when compared to group 3; d indicates significant difference of groups when compared to group 4 at P < 0.05; and e indicates significant difference when compared with control group 5 P < 0.05.
Effects of H. hemerocallidea on serum levels of liver enzymes, total protein, and albumin.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST (U/L) | 142.20 ± 11.3 | 235.5 ± 39.5a | 237.7 ± 26.4a | 183.6 ± 20 | 179.5 ± 15.9c |
| ALT (U/L) | 74.22 ± 7.87b | 120.9 ± 8.56 | 85.7 ± 8.07b | 79.8 ± 11.6b | 79.3 ± 6.84b |
| ALP (U/L) | 136.5 ± 8.47 | 537.9 ± 68.5a | 424.2 ± 71.3a | 214.9 ± 50.9abc | 134.9 ± 11bc |
| Total protein (g/L) | 56.5 ± 0.79 | 50.59 ± 1.87a | 50.31 ± 0.29a | 51.2 ± 0.8280a | 54.4 ± 0.73bc |
| Albumin (g/L) | 33.19 ± 0.33 | 30.01 ± 0.34a | 20.9 ± 0.54a | 30.28 ± 1.24a | 32.6 ± 1.29bcd |
Group 1: normal control; group 2: diabetic control; group 3: diabetic group fed with 800 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; group 4: diabetic group fed with 200 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; group 5: normal controls (nondiabetic) fed with 800 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; a represents a significant difference when compared to group 1 control at P < 0.05; b indicates significant difference of groups when compared to group 2 at P < 0.05; c represents a significant differences of values in groups when compared to group 3; and d represents significant difference of groups when compared to group 4; value in columns indicates means and ± standard error means (SEM).
Figure 2Effects of H. hemerocallidea on tissue antioxidant status. Group 1: normal control; group 2: diabetic control; group 3: diabetic group fed with 800 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; group 4: diabetic group fed with 200 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; group 5: normal controls (nondiabetic) fed with 800 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; A represents a significant difference when compared to group 1 control at P < 0.05; B indicates significant difference of groups when compared to group 2 at P < 0.05; and C represents significant differences of values in groups when compared to group 3; value in columns indicates means and ± standard error means (SEM).
Effects of H. hemerocallidea on activities of endogenous antioxidant enzymes in liver and kidney tissue.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | |||||
| CAT ( | 50.52 ± 1.61 | 39.41 ± 1.18a | 50.74 ± 3.0b | 52.02 ± 2.63b | 52.8 ± 1.84b |
| SOD (U/ | 41.46 ± 0.68 | 39.34 ± 0.45 | 41.84 ± 0.51 | 40.37 ± 0.6 | 41.54 ± 0.62 |
| GSHt ( | 5.02 ± 0.31 | 3.06 ± 0.44ae | 4.64 ± 0.56 | 4.17 ± 0.38 | 5.39 ± 0.3 |
| Kidney | |||||
| CAT ( | 28.64 ± 2.27 | 35.58 ± 0.8a | 31.46 ± 1.49 | 26.38 ± 1.34b | 24.79 ± 1.25bc |
| SOD (U/ | 43.58 ± 1.29 | 40.96 ± 1.17 | 42.50 ± 0.67 | 43.55 ± 0.45 | 48.18 ± 0.57abcd |
| GSHt ( | 6.33 ± 0.19 | 5.10 ± 0.28 | 6.10 ± 0.18 | 6.42 ± 0.26 | 7.92 ± 0.51abcd |
Group 1: normal control; group 2: diabetic control; group 3: diabetic group fed with 800 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; group 4: diabetic group fed with 200 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; group 5: normal controls (nondiabetic) fed with 800 mg/kg of H. hemerocallidea; a represents a significant difference when compared to group 1 control at P < 0.05; b indicates significant difference of groups when compared to group 2 at P < 0.05; c represents a significant differences of values in groups when compared to group 3; d represents significant difference of groups when compared to group 4; and e represents the significant difference of groups when compared to group 5; value in columns indicates means and ± standard error means (SEM).