BACKGROUND: Pathogen reduction methods for blood components are effective for a large number of viruses though less against small, non-enveloped viruses such as Parvovirus B19 (B19V). This article describes the passive transmission by transfusion of two B19V-contaminated pooled platelet concentrates (PCs) which were treated with the Intercept® blood pathogen reduction system. CASE REPORTS: Two transfusion cases of B19V-contaminated Intercept-treated pooled PCs were described. Due to the analysis delay, the PCs were already transfused. The viral content of each donation was 4.87 × 10(10) IU/ml in case 1and 1.46 × 10(8) IU/ml in case 2. B19V (52 IU/ml) was detected in the recipient of the case 1 PC, whereas no virus could be detected in the case 2 PC recipient. A B19V IgM response and a transient boost of the underlying B19V IgG immune status and was observed in recipient 1. Recipient of the case 2 PC remained B19V IgG- and IgM-negative. B19V DNA sequence and phylogenetic analysis revealed a 100% homology between donor and recipient. CONCLUSION: This report describes passive B19V transmission by a PC with very high B19 viral load which elicited a transient boost of the B19V immunity, but not by a PC with a lower B19V content, suggesting that there is a B19 viral load threshold value at which B19V inactivation is exceeded.
BACKGROUND: Pathogen reduction methods for blood components are effective for a large number of viruses though less against small, non-enveloped viruses such as Parvovirus B19 (B19V). This article describes the passive transmission by transfusion of two B19V-contaminated pooled platelet concentrates (PCs) which were treated with the Intercept® blood pathogen reduction system. CASE REPORTS: Two transfusion cases of B19V-contaminated Intercept-treated pooled PCs were described. Due to the analysis delay, the PCs were already transfused. The viral content of each donation was 4.87 × 10(10) IU/ml in case 1and 1.46 × 10(8) IU/ml in case 2. B19V (52 IU/ml) was detected in the recipient of the case 1 PC, whereas no virus could be detected in the case 2 PC recipient. A B19V IgM response and a transient boost of the underlying B19V IgG immune status and was observed in recipient 1. Recipient of the case 2 PC remained B19V IgG- and IgM-negative. B19V DNA sequence and phylogenetic analysis revealed a 100% homology between donor and recipient. CONCLUSION: This report describes passive B19V transmission by a PC with very high B19 viral load which elicited a transient boost of the B19V immunity, but not by a PC with a lower B19V content, suggesting that there is a B19 viral load threshold value at which B19V inactivation is exceeded.
Authors: Johannes Blümel; Ivo Schmidt; Wolfgang Effenberger; Holger Seitz; Hannelore Willkommen; Hans Herrmann Brackmann; Johannes Löwer; Anna Maria Eis-Hübinger Journal: Transfusion Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Mei-Ying W Yu; Harvey J Alter; Maria Luisa A Virata-Theimer; Yansheng Geng; Li Ma; Cathy A Schechterly; Camilla A Colvin; Naomi L C Luban Journal: Transfusion Date: 2010-02-12 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Giovanni Di Minno; David Navarro; Carlo Federico Perno; Mariana Canaro; Lutz Gürtler; James W Ironside; Hermann Eichler; Andreas Tiede Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2017-06-18 Impact factor: 3.673