Literature DB >> 27402787

Influence of the Pectoralis Major Muscle Sling in Chest Wall-Based Flap Suspension After Vertical Mammaplasty: Ten-Year Follow-Up.

Ruth Graf1, André Ricardo Dall Oglio Tolazzi1, Priscilla Balbinot1, André Pazio1, Pedro Miguel Valente1, Renato da Silva Freitas1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pectoralis muscle sling has proven to be a suitable alternative technique for long-term results in breast parenchyma suspension. Although the pectoralis muscle sling has been subjectively observed to reduce the bottoming-out effect with a bipedicled muscle flap (muscular loop), there has not been a study to objectively or numerically prove it.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to radiologically evaluate the influence of a pectoralis muscle sling in supporting the chest wall-based flap after a vertical breast-reduction technique.
METHODS: Twenty-one female patients underwent a vertical breast reduction with the chest wall-based flap and were randomly divided into two subgroups. Ten patients were in subgroup (S), which consisted of patients with a muscle sling. Eleven patients without the muscle sling technique were assigned as a control group (C). Periodic radiological examinations were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then at 10 years postoperatively to analyze the breast flap and any migration with respect to three titanium clips placed intraoperatively on the chest wall parenchyma flap.
RESULTS: Patients in subgroup S had a significantly higher difference in migration of the chest wall-based flaps between the first day and 10 years postoperatively when compared with patients in subgroup C (P < .001), as shown by the distances measured between titanium clip locations.
CONCLUSIONS: After 10 years of follow-up, there were changes in chest wall-based flap bottoming-out in patients in whom a pectoralis major muscle sling was utilized compared with those patients without it. Thus, a pectoralis major muscle sling seems to provide greater and longer-lasting support to the flap position on the patient's chest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Therapeutic.
© 2016 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27402787     DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjw114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  5 in total

1.  Reoperative Augmentation Mammoplasty: An Algorithm to Optimize Soft-Tissue Support, Pocket Control, and Smooth Implant Stability with Composite Reverse Inferior Muscle Sling (CRIMS) and its Technical Variations.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Ary de Azevedo Marques Neto; João Maximiliano
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  A Comparison of 28 Published Augmentation/Mastopexy Techniques Using Photographic Measurements.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-09-21

Review 3.  Ptosis and Bottoming out Following Mastopexy and Reduction Mammoplasty. Is Synthetic Mesh Internal Breast Support the Solution? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Bishara Atiyeh; Fadi Ghieh; Fadel Chahine; Ahmad Oneisi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 4.  Longevity of ptosis correction in mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty: A systematic review of techniques.

Authors:  Ryan D Wagner; Jeffrey L Lisiecki; Michael V Chiodo; Rod J Rohrich
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-05-13

5.  Improvement of Superomedial Breast Reduction and Mastopexy with a New "Hammock" Flap.

Authors:  Angelica Aquinati; Adriana Tuttolomondo; Giovanni Ruocco; Michele Riccio
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-07-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.