Literature DB >> 27402530

Experiences of prenatal diagnosis and decision-making about termination of pregnancy: A qualitative study.

Jan Hodgson1,2, Penelope Pitt1, Sylvia Metcalfe1,2, Jane Halliday1,2, Melody Menezes1,3, Jane Fisher4, Chriselle Hickerton1, Kerry Petersen5, Belinda McClaren1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in genetic technologies and ultrasound screening techniques have increased the ability to predict and diagnose congenital anomalies during pregnancy. As a result more prospective parents than ever before will receive a prenatal diagnosis of a fetal abnormality. Little is known about how Australian women and men experience receiving a prenatal diagnosis and how they make their decision about whether or not to continue the pregnancy. AIMS: This qualitative study aims to describe parental experiences and examine how best to provide support after a prenatal diagnosis.
RESULTS: Individual in-depth interviews were conducted with 102 women and men approximately six weeks post-diagnosis of fetal abnormality. Data were elicited using a narrative, chronological approach and women (n = 75) and a sample of male partners (n = 27) were separately interviewed. Thematic analysis, involving a rigorous process of qualitative coding, enabled iterative development and validation of emergent themes. Participants identified that the shock of the diagnosis can be lessened when good care is delivered, by provision of: clear, accurate and respectful communication; empathic, non-judgemental, professional support; timely access to further testing and appointments; seamless interactions with services and administration; appropriate choices about invasive testing; acknowledgment of the enormity and unexpected nature of the diagnosis, and of the subsequent decision-making challenges; and discussion of the myriad feelings likely to emerge throughout the process.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated the importance of providing timely access to accurate information and supportive, non-judgemental care for women and their partners following prenatal diagnosis of a fetal abnormality.
© 2016 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; fetal abnormality; prenatal diagnosis; qualitative; termination of pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27402530     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  14 in total

1.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Breaking bad news to antenatal patients with strategies to lessen the pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  José Atienza-Carrasco; Manuel Linares-Abad; María Padilla-Ruiz; Isabel María Morales-Gil
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Psychological experiences of women with pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies: a qualitative study from the perspective of women, their spouses, and healthcare providers in Iran.

Authors:  Bahareh Kamranpour; Mahnaz Noroozi; Masoud Bahrami
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Parental decision-making following a prenatal diagnosis that is lethal, life-limiting, or has long term implications for the future child and family: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.

Authors:  Claire Blakeley; Debbie M Smith; Edward D Johnstone; Anja Wittkowski
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies: Parents' preferences for psychosocial care.

Authors:  Frederike H W Dekkers; Attie T J I Go; Luuk Stapersma; Alex J Eggink; Elisabeth M W J Utens
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 6.  Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?

Authors:  Melissa Hill; Angela Barrett; Mahesh Choolani; Celine Lewis; Jane Fisher; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Help-seeking Following Termination of Pregnancy after Diagnosis of Fetal Anomaly: Women's Intentions and Experiences 1 to 7 Years after the Event.

Authors:  Franz Hanschmidt; Rahel Hoffmann; Johanna Klingner; Anette Kersting; Holger Stepan
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: A qualitative analysis of parental decision making and the implications for healthcare encounters.

Authors:  Robyn Lotto; Lucy K Smith; Natalie Armstrong
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  A qualitative study exploring the needs related to the health system in women with experience of pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies in Iran.

Authors:  Bahareh Kamranpour; Mahnaz Noroozi; Masoud Bahrami
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Utility of Genetic Testing from the Perspective of Parents/Caregivers: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Stephanie Luca; Daniel Assamad; Ayushi Bhatt; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.