Literature DB >> 27402373

Racial Disparities Differ for African Americans and Hispanics in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Penile Cancer.

Emily A Slopnick1, Simon P Kim2, Jonathan E Kiechle2, Christopher M Gonzalez2, Hui Zhu3, Robert Abouassaly2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate racial disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of penile cancer among a contemporary series of men from a large diverse national data base.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the 1998-2012 National Cancer Data Base, all men with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were stratified by race and ethnicity. Demographic and disease characteristics were compared between groups. Likelihood of undergoing surgery and type of surgery were compared among patients with nonmetastatic disease. Factors influencing disease stage and treatment type were analyzed with univariate and multivariable logistic regressions. Overall survival was examined with Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS: We identified 12,090 men with penile SCC with median age 66 years (range 18-90). Distribution of patients is as follows: 76.8% Caucasian, 10.2% African American (AA), 8.7% Hispanic. On multivariable analysis, Hispanic men are more likely to present with high-risk (≥T1G3) penile SCC (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.00; P = .001) and tend to undergo penectomy rather than penile-sparing surgery (OR 1.46; CI 1.15-1.85; P = .002) for equal stage SCC compared to Caucasian patients. Whereas AA men are less likely to undergo surgery of any type (OR 0.67; CI 0.51-0.87; P = .003) and have higher mortality rates than Caucasian patients (hazard ratio 1.25; CI 1.10-1.42; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Hispanic men with penile SCC are more likely to present with high-risk disease and undergo more aggressive treatment than Caucasian patients but have comparable survival. AA men are less likely to undergo surgical management of their disease and have higher mortality rates.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27402373     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Underutilization of Surgical Standard of Care for Insured Men with Invasive Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Edward K Chang; Rishi R Sekar; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore; Jonathan L Wright; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2021-05-01

2.  Development and Verification of Prognostic Nomogram for Penile Cancer Based on the SEER Database.

Authors:  Yon-Bo Chen; Ying-Wen Liu; Liang Gao; Liang-You Tang; Jiang Guo; Yu-Chang Tian; Ping-Hong You
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Competing-risks model for predicting the prognosis of penile cancer based on the SEER database.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Zhenyu Pan; Yujing He; Fanfan Zhao; Xiaojie Feng; Qingqing Liu; Jun Lyu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 4.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.