Literature DB >> 27402135

Can the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improve the performance of chest compressions during bystander resuscitation: A randomised crossover manikin study.

Georgette Eaton1, John Renshaw2, Pete Gregory3, Tim Kilner4.   

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR training application can improve the depth and rate of chest compression and therefore be confidently recommended for bystander use. A total of 118 candidates were recruited into a randomised crossover manikin trial. Each candidate performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 2 min without instruction or performed chest compressions using the PocketCPR application. Candidates then performed a further 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the opposite arm. The number of chest compressions performed improved when PocketCPR was used compared to chest compressions when it was not (44.28% vs 40.57%, p < 0.001). The number of chest compressions performed to the required depth was higher in the PocketCPR group (90.86 vs 66.26). The British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improved the percentage of chest compressions that were performed to the required depth. Despite this, more work is required in order to develop a feedback device that can improve bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation without creating delay.

Keywords:  PocketCPR; assistive technologies; bystander; healthcare service innovation and information technology; mobile health

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27402135     DOI: 10.1177/1460458216652645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Informatics J        ISSN: 1460-4582            Impact factor:   2.681


  6 in total

1.  Interventions to improve the quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kuan-Yu Chen; Ying-Chih Ko; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Wen-Chu Chiang; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Does the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR training application improve confidence in bystanders performing CPR?

Authors:  John Renshaw; Georgette Eaton; Pete Gregory; Tim Kilner
Journal:  Br Paramed J       Date:  2018-06-01

3.  Effect of smartphone applications on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality metrics in a mannequin study: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Hüseyin Sevil; Volga Bastan; Esma Gültürk; Imad El Majzoub; Erkan Göksu
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04-09

4.  Impact of a Smart-Ring-Based Feedback System on the Quality of Chest Compressions in Adult Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Chiwon Ahn; Seungjae Lee; Jongshill Lee; Jaehoon Oh; Yeongtak Song; In Young Kim; Hyunggoo Kang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Effect of a feedback system on the quality of 2-minute chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised crossover simulation study.

Authors:  Chunshuang Wu; Jingyu You; Shaoyun Liu; Lan Ying; Yuzhi Gao; Yulin Li; Xiao Lu; Anyu Qian; Mao Zhang; Guangju Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Effect of a real-time feedback smartphone application (TCPRLink) on the quality of telephone-assisted CPR performed by trained laypeople in China: a manikin-based randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Xuejie Dong; Lin Zhang; Helge Myklebust; Tonje Soraas Birkenes; Zhi-Jie Zheng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.