Ivana Musilova1, Tomas Bestvina1, Martina Hudeckova1, Igor Michalec2, Teresa Cobo3, Bo Jacobsson4, Marian Kacerovsky5. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital in Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic. 3. BCNatal-Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clinic and Hospital Sant Joan de Deu), Fetal i+D Fetal Medicine Research Center, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Raras), Barcelona, Spain. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Genes and Environment, Division of Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Biomedical Research Center, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Electronic address: kacermar@fnhk.cz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes is frequently complicated/accompanied by infection and inflammation in the amniotic cavity. A point-of-care determination of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 has been shown to be a potentially clinically useful approach to assess inflammatory status of the amniotic cavity. Amniocentesis in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes is not broadly used in clinical practice, and therefore, a shift toward a noninvasive amniotic fluid sampling method is needed. OBJECTIVE: The first aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the point-of-care vaginal and amniotic fluid interleukin-6 concentrations in fresh unprocessed samples obtained simultaneously. The second goal was to determine the diagnostic indices and predictive value of the point-of-care assessment of vaginal fluid interleukin-6 concentration in the identification of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, intraamniotic inflammation, and microbial-associated intraamniotic inflammation in patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted in women with singleton gestation complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes at between 24+0 and 36+6 weeks. A total of 153 women with singleton pregnancies were included in this study. Vaginal fluid was obtained from the posterior vaginal fornix by aspiration with a sterile urine sample tube with a suction tip. Amniotic fluid was obtained by transabdominal amniocentesis. Interleukin-6 concentrations were assessed with a lateral flow immunoassay in both fluids immediately after sampling. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity was determined based on a positive polymerase chain reaction analysis. Intraamniotic inflammation was defined as an amniotic fluid point-of-care interleukin-6 concentration ≥745 pg/mL. RESULTS: Several results were obtained in this study. First, it was possible to perform the point-of-care assessment of interleukin-6 in vaginal fluid in 92% of the women (141 of 153), and only those women were included in the analyses. Second, the rate of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intraamniotic inflammation was 26% (36 of 141) and 19% (27 of 141), respectively. Microbial-associated intraamniotic inflammation was identified in 12% of the women (17 of 141). Third, a strong positive correlation was found between the interleukin-6 concentrations in vaginal and amniotic fluids (Spearman rho 0.68; P < .0001). Fourth, the presence of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, intraamniotic inflammation, or microbial-associated intraamniotic inflammation was associated with higher vaginal fluid interleukin-6 concentrations in both crude and adjusted analyses. Fifth, a vaginal fluid interleukin-6 concentration of 2500 pg/mL was determined to be the best cutoff value for the identification of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (sensitivity of 53% [19 of 36], specificity of 89% [93 of 104], positive predictive value of 63% [19 of 30], negative predictive value of 85% [93 of 110], positive likelihood ratio of 5.0 [95% confidence interval, 2.5-9.5], and negative likelihood ratio of 0.5 [95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.8]); intraamniotic inflammation (sensitivity of 74% [20/27], specificity of 91% [104/114], positive predictive value of 67% [20 of 30], negative predictive value of 94% [104 of 111], positive likelihood ratio of 8.4 [95% confidence interval, 4.5-15.9], and negative likelihood ratio of 0.3 [95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.5]); and microbial-associated intraamniotic inflammation (sensitivity of 100% [17 of 17], specificity of 90% [111 of 124), positive predictive value of 57% [17 of 30], negative predictive value of 100% [111 of 111], positive likelihood ratio of 9.5 [95% confidence interval, 5.7-16.0], and negative likelihood ratio of 0). CONCLUSION: The point-of-care assessment of interleukin-6 in vaginal fluid is an easy, rapid, noninvasive, and inexpensive method for the identification of intraamniotic inflammation and microbial-associated intraamniotic inflammation in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes pregnancies, showing good specificity and negative predictive value.
BACKGROUND: Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes is frequently complicated/accompanied by infection and inflammation in the amniotic cavity. A point-of-care determination of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 has been shown to be a potentially clinically useful approach to assess inflammatory status of the amniotic cavity. Amniocentesis in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes is not broadly used in clinical practice, and therefore, a shift toward a noninvasive amniotic fluid sampling method is needed. OBJECTIVE: The first aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the point-of-care vaginal and amniotic fluid interleukin-6 concentrations in fresh unprocessed samples obtained simultaneously. The second goal was to determine the diagnostic indices and predictive value of the point-of-care assessment of vaginal fluid interleukin-6 concentration in the identification of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, intraamniotic inflammation, and microbial-associated intraamniotic inflammation in patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted in women with singleton gestation complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes at between 24+0 and 36+6 weeks. A total of 153 women with singleton pregnancies were included in this study. Vaginal fluid was obtained from the posterior vaginal fornix by aspiration with a sterile urine sample tube with a suction tip. Amniotic fluid was obtained by transabdominal amniocentesis. Interleukin-6 concentrations were assessed with a lateral flow immunoassay in both fluids immediately after sampling. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity was determined based on a positive polymerase chain reaction analysis. Intraamniotic inflammation was defined as an amniotic fluid point-of-care interleukin-6 concentration ≥745 pg/mL. RESULTS: Several results were obtained in this study. First, it was possible to perform the point-of-care assessment of interleukin-6 in vaginal fluid in 92% of the women (141 of 153), and only those women were included in the analyses. Second, the rate of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intraamniotic inflammation was 26% (36 of 141) and 19% (27 of 141), respectively. Microbial-associated intraamniotic inflammation was identified in 12% of the women (17 of 141). Third, a strong positive correlation was found between the interleukin-6 concentrations in vaginal and amniotic fluids (Spearman rho 0.68; P < .0001). Fourth, the presence of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, intraamniotic inflammation, or microbial-associated intraamniotic inflammation was associated with higher vaginal fluid interleukin-6 concentrations in both crude and adjusted analyses. Fifth, a vaginal fluid interleukin-6 concentration of 2500 pg/mL was determined to be the best cutoff value for the identification of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (sensitivity of 53% [19 of 36], specificity of 89% [93 of 104], positive predictive value of 63% [19 of 30], negative predictive value of 85% [93 of 110], positive likelihood ratio of 5.0 [95% confidence interval, 2.5-9.5], and negative likelihood ratio of 0.5 [95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.8]); intraamniotic inflammation (sensitivity of 74% [20/27], specificity of 91% [104/114], positive predictive value of 67% [20 of 30], negative predictive value of 94% [104 of 111], positive likelihood ratio of 8.4 [95% confidence interval, 4.5-15.9], and negative likelihood ratio of 0.3 [95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.5]); and microbial-associated intraamniotic inflammation (sensitivity of 100% [17 of 17], specificity of 90% [111 of 124), positive predictive value of 57% [17 of 30], negative predictive value of 100% [111 of 111], positive likelihood ratio of 9.5 [95% confidence interval, 5.7-16.0], and negative likelihood ratio of 0). CONCLUSION: The point-of-care assessment of interleukin-6 in vaginal fluid is an easy, rapid, noninvasive, and inexpensive method for the identification of intraamniotic inflammation and microbial-associated intraamniotic inflammation in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes pregnancies, showing good specificity and negative predictive value.
Authors: Jerome F Strauss; Roberto Romero; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Hannah Haymond-Thornburg; Bhavi P Modi; Maria E Teves; Laurel N Pearson; Timothy P York; Harvey A Schenkein Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Marian Kacerovsky; Roberto Romero; Martin Stepan; Jaroslav Stranik; Jan Maly; Lenka Pliskova; Radka Bolehovska; Vladimir Palicka; Helena Zemlickova; Helena Hornychova; Jiri Spacek; Bo Jacobsson; Percy Pacora; Ivana Musilova Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 10.693