Literature DB >> 27401896

Impact on Patient Management of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Used for Cancer Diagnosis: Analysis of Data From the National Oncologic PET Registry.

Rathan M Subramaniam1, Anthony F Shields2, Archana Sachedina3, Lucy Hanna4, Fenghai Duan4, Barry A Siegel5, Bruce E Hillner6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the impact of [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) on intended management of patients in the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) for three different diagnostic indications: (a) determining whether a suspicious lesion is cancer (Dx), (b) detecting an unknown primary tumor site when there is confirmed or strongly suspected metastatic disease (cancer of unknown primary origin [CUP]), and (c) detecting a primary tumor site when there is a presumed paraneoplastic syndrome (PNS).
METHODS: We reviewed a sample of randomly selected reports of NOPR subjects who underwent PET for Dx and CUP and all reports for PNS to find subjects for analysis. For these studies, we evaluated the impact of PET on referring physicians' intended management, based on their management plans reported before and after PET.
RESULTS: Intended management was changed more frequently in the CUP group (43.1%) than in the Dx (23.9%) and PNS (25.4%) groups (CUP vs. Dx, p < .0001; PNS vs. Dx, p < .0001; CUP vs. PNS, p < .0002). Referring physicians reported that, in light of PET results, they were able to avoid further testing in approximately three-fourths of patients (71.8%-74.6%). At the time when the post-PET forms were completed, biopsies of suspicious sites had been performed in 21.2%, 32.4%, and 23.2%, respectively, of Dx, CUP, and PNS cases.
CONCLUSION: Our analysis of NOPR data shows that PET appears to have a substantial impact on intended management when used for three common diagnostic indications. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography appears to have a substantial impact on intended management when used for three targeted diagnostic indications: (a) determining whether a suspicious lesion is cancer, (b) detecting an unknown primary tumor site in a patient with confirmed or strongly suspected metastatic disease, and (c) detecting a primary tumor site in a patient with a presumed paraneoplastic syndrome. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer diagnosis; Cancer of unknown primary origin; National Oncologic PET Registry; Paraneoplastic syndrome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27401896      PMCID: PMC5016059          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  31 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET-CT in the evaluation of paraneoplastic syndromes: experience at a regional oncology centre.

Authors:  Sriram Vaidyanathan; Catherine Pennington; Chen Yi Ng; Fat Wui Poon; Sai Han
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.690

2.  The diagnostic value of PET/CT for primary ovarian cancer--a prospective study.

Authors:  Signe Risum; Claus Høgdall; Annika Loft; Anne K Berthelsen; Estrid Høgdall; Lotte Nedergaard; Lene Lundvall; Svend A Engelholm
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Positron emission tomography in pulmonary masses where tissue diagnosis is unhelpful or not possible.

Authors:  A G Pitman; R J Hicks; V Kalff; D S Binns; R E Ware; A F McKenzie; D L Ball; M P MacManus
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2001-09-17       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  PET scan in clinically suspected paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: a 6-year prospective study in a regional neuroscience unit.

Authors:  M Hadjivassiliou; S J Alder; E J R Van Beek; M B Hanney; E Lorenz; D G Rao; B Sharrack; W B Tindale
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 3.209

5.  Impact of 18F-FDG PET used after initial treatment of cancer: comparison of the National Oncologic PET Registry 2006 and 2009 cohorts.

Authors:  Bruce E Hillner; Barry A Siegel; Lucy Hanna; Anthony F Shields; Fenghai Duan; Ilana F Gareen; Bruce Quinn; R Edward Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  A prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT as diagnostic tools to identify the primary tumor site in patients with extracervical carcinoma of unknown primary site.

Authors:  Anne Kirstine H Møller; Annika Loft; Anne K Berthelsen; Karen D Pedersen; Jesper Graff; Charlotte B Christensen; Junia C Costa; Lene T Skovgaard; Katharina Perell; Bodil L Petersen; Gedske Daugaard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-06-18

7.  Meta-analysis: the detection of pancreatic malignancy with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  L A Orlando; S L Kulasingam; D B Matchar
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Unknown primary tumors: detection with dual-modality PET/CT--initial experience.

Authors:  Andreas Gutzeit; Gerald Antoch; Hilmar Kühl; Thomas Egelhof; Markus Fischer; Elke Hauth; Susanne Goehde; Andreas Bockisch; Jörg Debatin; Lutz Freudenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Paraneoplastic syndromes: detection of malignant tumors using [(18)F]FDG-PET.

Authors:  U Berner; C Menzel; D Rinne; S Kriener; N Hamscho; N Döbert; M Diehl; R Kaufmann; F Grünwald
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-06

10.  FDG-PET improves tumour detection in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes.

Authors:  S Younes-Mhenni; M F Janier; L Cinotti; J C Antoine; F Tronc; V Cottin; P J Ternamian; P Trouillas; J Honnorat
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [What does the nonradiologist expect from the radiologist?]

Authors:  Stefan Kasper; Isabel Virchow; Boris Hadaschik; Jan Philipp Radtke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Impact of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on management of cancer of unknown primary: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Anton S Becker; Richard K G Do; Heiko Schöder; Hedvig Hricak; H Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 9.162

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.