| Literature DB >> 27401521 |
Johannes Lorscheider1, Katherine Buzzard2, Vilija Jokubaitis1, Tim Spelman3, Eva Havrdova4, Dana Horakova4, Maria Trojano5, Guillermo Izquierdo6, Marc Girard7, Pierre Duquette7, Alexandre Prat7, Alessandra Lugaresi8, François Grand'Maison9, Pierre Grammond10, Raymond Hupperts11, Raed Alroughani12, Patrizia Sola13, Cavit Boz14, Eugenio Pucci15, Jeanette Lechner-Scott16, Roberto Bergamaschi17, Celia Oreja-Guevara18, Gerardo Iuliano19, Vincent Van Pesch20, Franco Granella21, Cristina Ramo-Tello22, Daniele Spitaleri23, Thor Petersen24, Mark Slee25, Freek Verheul26, Radek Ampapa27, Maria Pia Amato28, Pamela McCombe29, Steve Vucic30, José Luis Sánchez Menoyo31, Edgardo Cristiano32, Michael H Barnett33, Suzanne Hodgkinson34, Javier Olascoaga35, Maria Laura Saladino36, Orla Gray37, Cameron Shaw38, Fraser Moore39, Helmut Butzkueven40, Tomas Kalincik1.
Abstract
A number of studies have been conducted with the onset of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis as an inclusion criterion or an outcome of interest. However, a standardized objective definition of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis has been lacking. The aim of this work was to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of an objective definition for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, to enable comparability of future research studies. Using MSBase, a large, prospectively acquired, global cohort study, we analysed the accuracy of 576 data-derived onset definitions for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and first compared these to a consensus opinion of three neurologists. All definitions were then evaluated against 5-year disease outcomes post-assignment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: sustained disability, subsequent sustained progression, positive disability trajectory, and accumulation of severe disability. The five best performing definitions were further investigated for their timeliness and overall disability burden. A total of 17 356 patients were analysed. The best definition included a 3-strata progression magnitude in the absence of a relapse, confirmed after 3 months within the leading Functional System and required an Expanded Disability Status Scale step ≥4 and pyramidal score ≥2. It reached an accuracy of 87% compared to the consensus diagnosis. Seventy-eight per cent of the identified patients showed a positive disability trajectory and 70% reached significant disability after 5 years. The time until half of all patients were diagnosed was 32.6 years (95% confidence interval 32-33.6) after disease onset compared with the physicians' diagnosis at 36 (35-39) years. The identified patients experienced a greater disease burden [median annualized area under the disability-time curve 4.7 (quartiles 3.6, 6.0)] versus non-progressive patients [1.8 (1.2, 1.9)]. This objective definition of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale and information about preceding relapses provides a tool for a reproducible, accurate and timely diagnosis that requires a very short confirmation period. If applied broadly, the definition has the potential to strengthen the design and improve comparability of clinical trials and observational studies in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.Entities:
Keywords: MSBase; definition; disability; secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; study design
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27401521 DOI: 10.1093/brain/aww173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain ISSN: 0006-8950 Impact factor: 13.501