R Colin Carter1, Joseph L Jacobson2, Christopher D Molteno3, Neil C Dodge4, Ernesta M Meintjes5, Sandra W Jacobson2. 1. Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; rcolincarter@gmail.com. 2. Departments of Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Human Biology, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa; and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan. 3. Departments of Psychiatry and Mental Health, and. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan. 5. Human Biology, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa; and.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although both fetal and long-term growth restriction are well documented in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, effects on pattern of growth trajectory have not been characterized. Furthermore, the degree to which growth trajectories are related to fetal alcohol-related neurocognitive deficits is unknown. METHODS: Ninety-three heavy drinking pregnant women and 64 controls were recruited at initiation of prenatal care in Cape Town, South Africa. Small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as birth weight <10th percentile. Length/height, weight, and head circumference were measured at 6.5 and 12 months and 5, 9, and 13 years. Four growth trajectories were identified: SGA with long-term postnatal growth restriction (length/height-for-age <10th percentile through 13 years); SGA with catch-up growth; no SGA or postnatal growth restriction; and late-onset postnatal stunting. IQ was assessed at 5 and 10 years, and learning, memory, and executive function at 10 years. RESULTS: Children born SGA with postnatal growth restriction were most heavily exposed. Exposure was intermediate for those born SGA with catch-up growth and lowest for those without prenatal or postnatal growth restriction. Effects on neurocognition were strongest in children with both prenatal and long-term growth restriction, more moderate in those with fetal growth restriction and postnatal catch-up, and weakest in those without growth restriction. CONCLUSIONS: These findings validate the use of growth restriction in the diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and identify growth trajectory as a biomarker of which heavily exposed children are at greatest risk for cognitive developmental deficits.
BACKGROUND: Although both fetal and long-term growth restriction are well documented in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, effects on pattern of growth trajectory have not been characterized. Furthermore, the degree to which growth trajectories are related to fetal alcohol-related neurocognitive deficits is unknown. METHODS: Ninety-three heavy drinking pregnant women and 64 controls were recruited at initiation of prenatal care in Cape Town, South Africa. Small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as birth weight <10th percentile. Length/height, weight, and head circumference were measured at 6.5 and 12 months and 5, 9, and 13 years. Four growth trajectories were identified: SGA with long-term postnatal growth restriction (length/height-for-age <10th percentile through 13 years); SGA with catch-up growth; no SGA or postnatal growth restriction; and late-onset postnatal stunting. IQ was assessed at 5 and 10 years, and learning, memory, and executive function at 10 years. RESULTS:Children born SGA with postnatal growth restriction were most heavily exposed. Exposure was intermediate for those born SGA with catch-up growth and lowest for those without prenatal or postnatal growth restriction. Effects on neurocognition were strongest in children with both prenatal and long-term growth restriction, more moderate in those with fetal growth restriction and postnatal catch-up, and weakest in those without growth restriction. CONCLUSIONS: These findings validate the use of growth restriction in the diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and identify growth trajectory as a biomarker of which heavily exposed children are at greatest risk for cognitive developmental deficits.
Authors: Catherine E Lewis; Kevin G F Thomas; Neil C Dodge; Christopher D Molteno; Ernesta M Meintjes; Joseph L Jacobson; Sandra W Jacobson Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: R Colin Carter; Joseph L Jacobson; Robert J Sokol; Malcolm J Avison; Sandra W Jacobson Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: H Eugene Hoyme; Philip A May; Wendy O Kalberg; Piyadasa Kodituwakku; J Phillip Gossage; Phyllis M Trujillo; David G Buckley; Joseph H Miller; Alfredo S Aragon; Nathaniel Khaole; Denis L Viljoen; Kenneth Lyons Jones; Luther K Robinson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Philip A May; Jason Blankenship; Anna-Susan Marais; J Phillip Gossage; Wendy O Kalberg; Ronel Barnard; Marlene De Vries; Luther K Robinson; Colleen M Adnams; David Buckley; Melanie Manning; Kenneth L Jones; Charles Parry; H Eugene Hoyme; Soraya Seedat Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: S N Mattson; E P Riley; T L Jernigan; C L Ehlers; D C Delis; K L Jones; C Stern; K A Johnson; J R Hesselink; U Bellugi Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 1992-10 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Kathryn V Dalrymple; John M D Thompson; Shahina Begum; Keith M Godfrey; Lucilla Poston; Paul T Seed; Lesley M E McCowan; Clare Wall; Andrew Shelling; Robyn North; Wayne S Cutfield; Edwin A Mitchell Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Vikas N Kodali; Joseph L Jacobson; Nadine M Lindinger; Neil C Dodge; Christopher D Molteno; Ernesta M Meintjes; Sandra W Jacobson Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Katie L Davis-Anderson; Hendrik Wesseling; Lara M Siebert; Emilie R Lunde-Young; Vishal D Naik; Hanno Steen; Jayanth Ramadoss Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Richard C Chang; William M Skiles; Sarah S Chronister; Haiqing Wang; Gabrielle I Sutton; Yudhishtar S Bedi; Matthew Snyder; Charles R Long; Michael C Golding Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Shane M Huebner; Kaylee K Helfrich; Nipun Saini; Sharon E Blohowiak; Adrienne A Cheng; Pamela J Kling; Susan M Smith Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-05-19 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Sze Ting Cecilia Kwan; Camille A Kezer; Kaylee K Helfrich; Nipun Saini; Shane M Huebner; George R Flentke; Pamela J Kling; Susan M Smith Journal: Alcohol Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 2.405
Authors: Sandra W Jacobson; R Colin Carter; Christopher D Molteno; Mark E Stanton; Jane S Herbert; Nadine M Lindinger; Catherine E Lewis; Neil C Dodge; H Eugene Hoyme; Steven H Zeisel; Ernesta M Meintjes; Christopher P Duggan; Joseph L Jacobson Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Sandra W Jacobson; R Colin Carter; Christopher D Molteno; Ernesta M Meintjes; Marjanne S Senekal; Nadine M Lindinger; Neil C Dodge; Steven H Zeisel; Christopher P Duggan; Joseph L Jacobson Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 3.455