Literature DB >> 27401022

Effects of Pore Size on the Osteoconductivity and Mechanical Properties of Calcium Phosphate Cement in a Rabbit Model.

Yi-Nan Zhao1, Jun-Jun Fan1, Zhi-Quan Li1, Yan-Wu Liu1, Yao-Ping Wu1, Jian Liu1.   

Abstract

Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) porous scaffold is widely used as a suitable bone substitute to repair bone defect, but the optimal pore size is unclear yet. The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of different pore sizes on the processing of bone formation in repairing segmental bone defect of rabbits using CPC porous scaffolds. Three kinds of CPC porous scaffolds with 5 mm diameters and 12 mm length were prepared with the same porosity but different pore sizes (Group A: 200-300 µm, Group B: 300-450 µm, Group C: 450-600 µm, respectively). Twelve millimeter segmental bone defects were created in the middle of the radius bone and filled with different kinds of CPC cylindrical scaffolds. After 4, 12, and 24 weeks, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), histological assessment, and mechanical properties evaluation were performed in all three groups. After 4 weeks, ALP activity increased in all groups but was highest in Group A with smallest pore size. The new bone formation within the scaffolds was not obvious in all groups. After 12 weeks, the new bone formation within the scaffolds was obvious in each group and highest in Group A. At 24 weeks, no significant difference in new bone formation was observed among different groups. Besides the osteoconductive effect, Group A with smallest pore size also had the best mechanical properties in vivo at 12 weeks. We demonstrate that pore size has a significant effect on the osteoconductivity and mechanical properties of calcium phosphate cement porous scaffold in vivo. Small pore size favors the bone formation in the early stage and may be more suitable for repairing segmental bone defect in vivo.
© 2016 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calcium phosphate cement; Mechanical properties; Osteoconductivity; Pore size; Segmental bone defect

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27401022     DOI: 10.1111/aor.12742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  6 in total

Review 1.  Precision medicine strategies for spinal degenerative diseases: Injectable biomaterials with in situ repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhao; Hongyun Ma; Hao Han; Liuyang Zhang; Jing Tian; Bo Lei; Yingang Zhang
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 2.  Biological properties of calcium phosphate biomaterials for bone repair: a review.

Authors:  Jingyi Lu; Huijun Yu; Chuanzhong Chen
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 3.  On the road to smart biomaterials for bone research: definitions, concepts, advances, and outlook.

Authors:  Carolina Montoya; Yu Du; Anthony L Gianforcaro; Santiago Orrego; Maobin Yang; Peter I Lelkes
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 4.  Conductive Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: Current State and Future Outlook.

Authors:  Damion T Dixon; Cheryl T Gomillion
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2021-12-21

5.  Effects of different intensities of intermittent pneumatic soft-tissue compression on bone defect repair.

Authors:  Weilong Diwu; Gang Hu; Minghao Zhou; Long Bi; Ming Yan; Hongbo Wei; Junjun Fan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  3D-Printed Ceramic Bone Scaffolds with Variable Pore Architectures.

Authors:  Ho-Kyung Lim; Seok-Jin Hong; Sun-Ju Byeon; Sung-Min Chung; Sung-Woon On; Byoung-Eun Yang; Jong-Ho Lee; Soo-Hwan Byun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.