Literature DB >> 27400977

Parasite Rates of Discovery, Global Species Richness and Host Specificity.

Mark John Costello1.   

Abstract

If every metazoan species has at least one host-specific parasite, as several local scale studies have suggested, then half of all species could be parasites. However, host specificity varies significantly depending on host phylogeny, body size, habitat, and geographic distribution. The best studied hosts tend to be vertebrates, larger animals, and/or widespread, and thus have a higher number of parasites and host-specific parasites. Thus, host specificity for these well-known taxa cannot be simply extrapolated to other taxa, notably invertebrates, small sized, and more endemic species, which comprise the major portion of yet to be discovered species. At present, parasites of animals comprise about 5% of named species. This article analyzed the rate of description of several largely parasitic taxa within crustaceans (copepods, amphipods, isopods, pentastomids, cirripeds), marine helminths (nematodes, acanthocephalans, flukes), gastropod molluscs, insects (ticks, fleas, biting flies, strepispterans), and microsporidia. The period of highest discovery has been most recent for the marine helminths and microsporids. The number of people describing parasites has been increasing since the 1960s, as it has for all other taxa. However, the number of species being described per decade relative to the number of authors has been decreasing except for the helminths. The results indicate that more than half of all parasites have been described, and two-thirds of host taxa, although the proportion varies between taxa. It is highly unlikely that the number of named species of parasites will ever approach that of their hosts. This contrast between the proportion that parasites comprise of local and global faunas suggests that parasites are less host specific and more widespread than local scale studies suggest.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27400977     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icw084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  6 in total

1.  Poor geographical match between the distributions of host diversity and parasite discovery effort.

Authors:  Fátima Jorge; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A new species of Hamaticolax (Copepoda: Bomolochidae) from Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) (Scorpaeniformes: Sebastidae) in NW Mediterranean deep waters and notes on patterns of host use and host-specificity of the genus.

Authors:  Sara Dallarés; María Constenla; Maite Carrassón
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  What would it take to describe the global diversity of parasites?

Authors:  Colin J Carlson; Tad A Dallas; Laura W Alexander; Alexandra L Phelan; Anna J Phillips
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  specificity: an R package for analysis of feature specificity to environmental and higher dimensional variables, applied to microbiome species data.

Authors:  John L Darcy; Anthony S Amend; Sean O I Swift; Pacifica S Sommers; Catherine A Lozupone
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2022-06-25

5.  Progress in the discovery of amphipod crustaceans.

Authors:  Tri Arfianti; Simon Wilson; Mark John Costello
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Global Studies of the Host-Parasite Relationships between Ectoparasitic Mites of the Family Syringophilidae and Birds of the Order Columbiformes.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kaszewska-Gilas; Jakub Ziemowit Kosicki; Martin Hromada; Maciej Skoracki
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.