Literature DB >> 27400731

Spine loading during the application and removal of lifting slings: the effects of patient weight, bed height and work method.

Shasank Nagavarapu1, Steven A Lavender1,2, William S Marras1,3.   

Abstract

The biomechanical loading on the lumbar spine was assessed as 12 female nurses applied and removed slings under two patients of differing weights (54 and 100 kg), using two work methods, and while working at three bed heights (56, 71, 93 cm). Three-dimensional spine loads at the L2/L3, L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1 disc levels were measured using a validated EMG-assisted biomechanical model. Anterior/posterior (A/P) shear loading at the L5/S1 level consistently exceeded the tolerance threshold limit for disc failure. The peak compression values exceeded the 3400 N tolerance threshold for several participants when placing the sling under the 100-kg patient. In general, working from both sides of the bed generated slightly higher A/P shear loading than the one-sided method. Raising the bed significantly decreased compression and A/P shear forces. Therefore, raising the bed to at least the nurse's knuckle height is recommended when applying and removing patient slings. Practitioners Summary: We investigated the spine loading associated with placing and removing slings used for the mechanised lifting of patients. Peak compression and anterior shear forces exceeded recognised thresholds when placing slings underneath heavier patients. Raising the bed to at least knuckle level helps mitigate these spinal loads.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Musculoskeletal disorders; bed height; lifting sling; patient handling; patient lifts

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27400731     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1211750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Effect of Repositioning Aids and Patient Weight on Biomechanical Stresses When Repositioning Patients in Bed.

Authors:  Neal Wiggermann; Jie Zhou; Nancy McGann
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Reducing lumbar spine flexion using real-time biofeedback during patient handling tasks.

Authors:  Mohammadhasan Owlia; Megan Kamachi; Tilak Dutta
Journal:  Work       Date:  2020

Review 3.  Proning Patients With COVID-19: A Review of Equipment and Methods.

Authors:  Neal Wiggermann; Jie Zhou; Dee Kumpar
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.888

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.