Literature DB >> 27400026

Contrasting ecosystem CO2 fluxes of inland and coastal wetlands: a meta-analysis of eddy covariance data.

Weizhi Lu1, Jingfeng Xiao2, Fang Liu3, Yue Zhang1, Chang'an Liu1, Guanghui Lin3,4.   

Abstract

Wetlands play an important role in regulating the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2 ) concentrations and thus affecting the climate. However, there is still lack of quantitative evaluation of such a role across different wetland types, especially at the global scale. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare ecosystem CO2 fluxes among various types of wetlands using a global database compiled from the literature. This database consists of 143 site-years of eddy covariance data from 22 inland wetland and 21 coastal wetland sites across the globe. Coastal wetlands had higher annual gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Re ), and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) than inland wetlands. On a per unit area basis, coastal wetlands provided large CO2 sinks, while inland wetlands provided small CO2 sinks or were nearly CO2 neutral. The annual CO2 sink strength was 93.15 and 208.37 g C m-2 for inland and coastal wetlands, respectively. Annual CO2 fluxes were mainly regulated by mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP). For coastal and inland wetlands combined, MAT and MAP explained 71%, 54%, and 57% of the variations in GPP, Re , and NEP, respectively. The CO2 fluxes of wetlands were also related to leaf area index (LAI). The CO2 fluxes also varied with water table depth (WTD), although the effects of WTD were not statistically significant. NEP was jointly determined by GPP and Re for both inland and coastal wetlands. However, the NEP/Re and NEP/GPP ratios exhibited little variability for inland wetlands and decreased for coastal wetlands with increasing latitude. The contrasting of CO2 fluxes between inland and coastal wetlands globally can improve our understanding of the roles of wetlands in the global C cycle. Our results also have implications for informing wetland management and climate change policymaking, for example, the efforts being made by international organizations and enterprises to restore coastal wetlands for enhancing blue carbon sinks.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon budget; cross-site synthesis; ecosystem respiration; gross primary productivity; mangroves; marshes; net ecosystem productivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27400026     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  5 in total

1.  Exotic Spartina alterniflora invasion increases CH4 while reduces CO2 emissions from mangrove wetland soils in southeastern China.

Authors:  Gui Feng Gao; Peng Fei Li; Zhi Jun Shen; Ying Ying Qin; Xi Min Zhang; Kabir Ghoto; Xue Yi Zhu; Hai Lei Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Estimation of short-term C-fixation in a New England temperate tidal freshwater wetland.

Authors:  Gailynn Milligan; Helen M Poulos; Martha S Gilmore; Graeme P Berlyn; Joseph Milligan; Barry Chernoff
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-29

3.  Productive wetlands restored for carbon sequestration quickly become net CO2 sinks with site-level factors driving uptake variability.

Authors:  Alex C Valach; Kuno Kasak; Kyle S Hemes; Tyler L Anthony; Iryna Dronova; Sophie Taddeo; Whendee L Silver; Daphne Szutu; Joseph Verfaillie; Dennis D Baldocchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of mangrove Bruguiera gymnorrhiza (L.) Lam. ex Savigny.

Authors:  Su-Yuan Li; Yi-Chan Li; Tian-Hao Zhang; Lan-Li Qin; Yi-Dong An; Yu-Kun Pang; Guo-Feng Jiang
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 0.658

5.  Plant biomass and soil organic carbon are main factors influencing dry-season ecosystem carbon rates in the coastal zone of the Yellow River Delta.

Authors:  Yong Li; Haidong Wu; Jinzhi Wang; Lijuan Cui; Dashuan Tian; Jinsong Wang; Xiaodong Zhang; Liang Yan; Zhongqing Yan; Kerou Zhang; Xiaoming Kang; Bing Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.